How to define the threshold of takeover response ability of different drivers in conditional automated driving

被引:0
|
作者
Chen, Haolin [1 ]
Zhao, Xiaohua [1 ]
Chen, Chen [1 ]
Li, Zhenlong [1 ]
Li, Haijian [1 ]
Gong, Jianguo [2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Technol, Beijing Key Lab Traff Engn, Beijing 100124, Peoples R China
[2] Res Inst Rd Safety MPS, Beijing 100062, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Automated vehicle; Takeover time; Threshold calculation; Driver attributes; generalized Pareto distribution; Driving simulator; EXTREME-VALUE THEORY; GENERALIZED PARETO DISTRIBUTION; INFERENCE; BEHAVIOR; MODEL; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.trf.2024.08.013
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
In conditional automated driving, the takeover response ability threshold is necessary for driver qualification assessment and liability division of automated vehicle accidents. The primary objective of this study is to establish a clear and quantifiable threshold for drivers' takeover response ability in conditional automated driving scenarios. This threshold aims to serve as a benchmark for evaluating drivers' readiness and developing safety regulations in automated driving. We designed 18 takeover events and invited 42 drivers to participate in the driving simulation experiment, and obtained their takeover time data. First, we analyze the differences of takeover time among drivers with different attributes (gender, age, driving year). Second, based on the Peaks Over Threshold and the generalized Pareto distribution model, we use the graphic method to calculate the range of takeover time threshold for drivers with different attributes. The result shows that the difference in the threshold range of takeover time between male and female drivers is relatively tiny. There are differences in the threshold range of takeover time for different age drivers, and the threshold is negatively correlated with age. Drivers with high driving experience within a safe range are allowed to have longer takeover times. Finally, the rationality of the takeover time threshold for drivers with different attributes has been verified. The return level curves are approximately linear (R-2 > 0.77), indicating that the GPD model can capture the overall trend of the return level, which is changing with the probability level. This proves that the takeover time threshold is reasonable. This study uses TTCmin to calibrate takeover safety, and the takeover time threshold has a good classification performance for takeover safety (accuracy > 85 %). The above content proves the rationality of the takeover time threshold. The contribution of this study is to calculate the takeover time threshold of drivers with different attributes, which can help regulatory authorities assess the driver's takeover response ability and support the liability division of automated vehicle accidents.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 198
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Speech-based takeover requests in conditionally automated driving: Effects of different voices on the driver takeover performance
    Wang, Yi
    Zhang, Wei
    Zhou, Ronggang
    APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2022, 101
  • [22] The Compatibility between the Takeover Process in Conditional Automated Driving and the Current Geometric Design of the Deceleration Lane in Highway
    Chen, Cihe
    Lin, Zijian
    Zhang, Shuguang
    Chen, Feng
    Chen, Peiyan
    Zhang, Lin
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (23)
  • [23] Exploring driving anger-caused impairment of takeover performance among professional taxi drivers during partially automated driving
    Pan, Hengyan
    Payre, William
    Gao, Zhixiang
    Wang, Yonggang
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2024, 205
  • [24] How Does Driver Takeover Worsen in a Sudden System Failure of Conditionally Automated Driving?
    Yao, Hua
    An, Suyang
    Zhou, Huiping
    Itoh, Makoto
    2020 59TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE SOCIETY OF INSTRUMENT AND CONTROL ENGINEERS OF JAPAN (SICE), 2020, : 1469 - 1474
  • [25] Transition in Different Critical Situations: How Non-Driving Related Tasks Affect Drivers' Physiological Response and Takeover Behavior After Partial Automation Silent Failures
    Xu, Linli
    Guo, Lie
    Ge, Pingshu
    Wang, Xu
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2024, 25 (11) : 16642 - 16652
  • [26] Drivers' Evaluation of Different Automated Driving Styles: Is It Both Comfortable and Natural?
    Peng, Chen
    Merat, Natasha
    Romano, Richard
    Hajiseyedjavadi, Foroogh
    Paschalidis, Evangelos
    Wei, Chongfeng
    Radhakrishnan, Vishnu
    Solernou, Albert
    Forster, Deborah
    Boer, Erwin
    HUMAN FACTORS, 2024, 66 (03) : 787 - 806
  • [27] Will I start an automated driving system? Report on the emotions, cognition, and intention of drivers who experienced real-world conditional automated driving
    Zhenhua Yu
    Kang Jiang
    Zhipeng Huang
    Ping Zhang
    Zhongxiang Feng
    Cognition, Technology & Work, 2022, 24 : 641 - 666
  • [28] How to Determine the Time-Intervals of Two-StageWarning Systems in Different Traffic Densities? An Investigation on the Takeover Process in Automated Driving
    Zhang, Wei
    Ma, Shu
    Yang, Zhen
    Wu, Changxu
    Li, Hongting
    Shi, Jinlei
    ENGINEERING PSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS, EPCE 2023, PT II, 2023, 14018 : 406 - 422
  • [29] Will I start an automated driving system? Report on the emotions, cognition, and intention of drivers who experienced real-world conditional automated driving
    Yu, Zhenhua
    Jiang, Kang
    Huang, Zhipeng
    Zhang, Ping
    Feng, Zhongxiang
    COGNITION TECHNOLOGY & WORK, 2022, 24 (04) : 641 - 666
  • [30] Drivers' Ability to Engage in a Non-Driving Related Task While in Automated Driving Mode in Real Traffic
    Klingegard, Maria
    Andersson, Jonas
    Habibovic, Azra
    Nilsson, Emma
    Rydstrom, Annie
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 221654 - 221668