How to define the threshold of takeover response ability of different drivers in conditional automated driving

被引:0
|
作者
Chen, Haolin [1 ]
Zhao, Xiaohua [1 ]
Chen, Chen [1 ]
Li, Zhenlong [1 ]
Li, Haijian [1 ]
Gong, Jianguo [2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Technol, Beijing Key Lab Traff Engn, Beijing 100124, Peoples R China
[2] Res Inst Rd Safety MPS, Beijing 100062, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Automated vehicle; Takeover time; Threshold calculation; Driver attributes; generalized Pareto distribution; Driving simulator; EXTREME-VALUE THEORY; GENERALIZED PARETO DISTRIBUTION; INFERENCE; BEHAVIOR; MODEL; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.trf.2024.08.013
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
In conditional automated driving, the takeover response ability threshold is necessary for driver qualification assessment and liability division of automated vehicle accidents. The primary objective of this study is to establish a clear and quantifiable threshold for drivers' takeover response ability in conditional automated driving scenarios. This threshold aims to serve as a benchmark for evaluating drivers' readiness and developing safety regulations in automated driving. We designed 18 takeover events and invited 42 drivers to participate in the driving simulation experiment, and obtained their takeover time data. First, we analyze the differences of takeover time among drivers with different attributes (gender, age, driving year). Second, based on the Peaks Over Threshold and the generalized Pareto distribution model, we use the graphic method to calculate the range of takeover time threshold for drivers with different attributes. The result shows that the difference in the threshold range of takeover time between male and female drivers is relatively tiny. There are differences in the threshold range of takeover time for different age drivers, and the threshold is negatively correlated with age. Drivers with high driving experience within a safe range are allowed to have longer takeover times. Finally, the rationality of the takeover time threshold for drivers with different attributes has been verified. The return level curves are approximately linear (R-2 > 0.77), indicating that the GPD model can capture the overall trend of the return level, which is changing with the probability level. This proves that the takeover time threshold is reasonable. This study uses TTCmin to calibrate takeover safety, and the takeover time threshold has a good classification performance for takeover safety (accuracy > 85 %). The above content proves the rationality of the takeover time threshold. The contribution of this study is to calculate the takeover time threshold of drivers with different attributes, which can help regulatory authorities assess the driver's takeover response ability and support the liability division of automated vehicle accidents.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 198
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Effects of different takeover request interfaces on takeover behavior and performance during conditionally automated driving
    Ou, Yang-Kun
    Huang, Wan-Xuan
    Fang, Chen-Wen
    Fang, Chen-Wen, 1600, Elsevier Ltd (162):
  • [12] Effects of different takeover request interfaces on takeover behavior and performance during conditionally automated driving
    Ou, Yang-Kun
    Huang, Wan-Xuan
    Fang, Chen-Wen
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2021, 162
  • [13] Drivers trust, acceptance, and takeover behaviors in fully automated vehicles: Effects of automated driving styles and driver's driving styles
    Ma, Zheng
    Zhang, Yiqi
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2021, 159
  • [14] How realistic are older drivers' ratings of their driving ability?
    Horswill, Mark S.
    Sullivan, Karen
    Lurie-Beck, Janine K.
    Smith, Simon
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2013, 50 : 130 - 137
  • [15] Takeover and non-driving related task performance in conditional automated driving: EEG and behavior Parameters interaction
    Gao, Yuan
    Rau, Pei-Luen Patrick
    APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2025, 123
  • [16] Safety evaluation and prediction of takeover performance in automated driving considering drivers' cognitive load: A driving simulator study
    Liu, Yongjie
    Wu, Chaozhong
    Zhang, Hui
    Ding, Naikan
    Xiao, Yiying
    Zhang, Qi
    Tian, Kai
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2024, 103 : 35 - 52
  • [17] Where drivers are looking at during takeover: Implications for safe takeovers during conditionally automated driving
    Huang, Chao
    Yang, Bo
    Nakano, Kimihiko
    TRAFFIC INJURY PREVENTION, 2023, 24 (07) : 599 - 608
  • [18] A behavioral inoculation method to improve critical takeover performance of novice drivers in conditionally automated driving
    Chai, Chen
    Weng, Shixuan
    Feng, Rui
    Wang, Jixiang
    Wong, Yiik Diew
    Wang, Yanbo
    TRAFFIC INJURY PREVENTION, 2025,
  • [19] Response times and gaze behavior of truck drivers in time critical conditional automated driving take-overs
    Lotz, Alexander
    Russwinkel, Nele
    Wohlfarth, Enrico
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2019, 64 : 532 - 551
  • [20] How to request drivers to prepare for takeovers during automated driving
    Wu, Yanbin
    Hasegawa, Kunihiro
    Kihara, Ken
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2025, 109 : 938 - 950