How to define the threshold of takeover response ability of different drivers in conditional automated driving

被引:0
|
作者
Chen, Haolin [1 ]
Zhao, Xiaohua [1 ]
Chen, Chen [1 ]
Li, Zhenlong [1 ]
Li, Haijian [1 ]
Gong, Jianguo [2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Technol, Beijing Key Lab Traff Engn, Beijing 100124, Peoples R China
[2] Res Inst Rd Safety MPS, Beijing 100062, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Automated vehicle; Takeover time; Threshold calculation; Driver attributes; generalized Pareto distribution; Driving simulator; EXTREME-VALUE THEORY; GENERALIZED PARETO DISTRIBUTION; INFERENCE; BEHAVIOR; MODEL; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.trf.2024.08.013
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
In conditional automated driving, the takeover response ability threshold is necessary for driver qualification assessment and liability division of automated vehicle accidents. The primary objective of this study is to establish a clear and quantifiable threshold for drivers' takeover response ability in conditional automated driving scenarios. This threshold aims to serve as a benchmark for evaluating drivers' readiness and developing safety regulations in automated driving. We designed 18 takeover events and invited 42 drivers to participate in the driving simulation experiment, and obtained their takeover time data. First, we analyze the differences of takeover time among drivers with different attributes (gender, age, driving year). Second, based on the Peaks Over Threshold and the generalized Pareto distribution model, we use the graphic method to calculate the range of takeover time threshold for drivers with different attributes. The result shows that the difference in the threshold range of takeover time between male and female drivers is relatively tiny. There are differences in the threshold range of takeover time for different age drivers, and the threshold is negatively correlated with age. Drivers with high driving experience within a safe range are allowed to have longer takeover times. Finally, the rationality of the takeover time threshold for drivers with different attributes has been verified. The return level curves are approximately linear (R-2 > 0.77), indicating that the GPD model can capture the overall trend of the return level, which is changing with the probability level. This proves that the takeover time threshold is reasonable. This study uses TTCmin to calibrate takeover safety, and the takeover time threshold has a good classification performance for takeover safety (accuracy > 85 %). The above content proves the rationality of the takeover time threshold. The contribution of this study is to calculate the takeover time threshold of drivers with different attributes, which can help regulatory authorities assess the driver's takeover response ability and support the liability division of automated vehicle accidents.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 198
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How Resource Demands of Nondriving-Related Tasks and Engagement Time Affect Drivers' Physiological Response and Takeover Performance in Conditional Automated Driving
    Guo, Lie
    Xu, Linli
    Ge, Pingshu
    Wang, Xu
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON HUMAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS, 2023, 53 (03) : 600 - 609
  • [2] Takeover performance of older drivers in automated driving: A review
    Gasne, C.
    Paire-Ficout, L.
    Bordel, S.
    Lafont, S.
    Ranchet, M.
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2022, 87 : 347 - 364
  • [3] Is driving experience all that matters? Drivers' takeover performance in conditionally automated driving
    Zhang, Neng
    Fard, Mohammad
    Davy, John Laurence
    Parida, Sibashis
    Robinson, Stephen R.
    JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH, 2023, 87 : 323 - 331
  • [4] Behavioral changes to repeated takeovers in automated driving: The drivers' ability to transfer knowledge and the effects of takeover request process
    Brandenburg, Stefan
    Roche, Fabienne
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2020, 73 : 15 - 28
  • [5] Identifying novice drivers in need of hazard perception ability improvement for takeover performance in Level 3 automated driving
    Weng, Shixuan
    Chai, Chen
    Yin, Weiru
    Wang, Yanbo
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2024, 208
  • [6] Drivers' individual design preferences of takeover requests in highly automated driving
    Brandenburg S.
    Epple S.
    i-com, 2019, 18 (02) : 167 - 178
  • [7] Enhancing Driver Takeover Quality in Conditional Automated Driving Optimizing HMI Expression During Takeover Process
    Liu, Yang
    HCI INTERNATIONAL 2024-LATE BREAKING POSTERS, HCII 2024, PT II, 2025, 2320 : 133 - 142
  • [8] Effects of non-driving-related tasks on takeover performance in different takeover situations in conditionally automated driving
    Dogan, Ebru
    Honnet, Vincent
    Masfrand, Stephan
    Guillaume, Anne
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2019, 62 : 494 - 504
  • [9] Influence Characteristics of Automated Driving Takeover Behavior in Different Scenarios
    Zhao X.-H.
    Chen H.-L.
    Li Z.-L.
    Li H.-J.
    Gong J.-G.
    Fu Q.
    Zhongguo Gonglu Xuebao/China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2022, 35 (09): : 195 - 214
  • [10] How do visual and cognitive non-driving related tasks affect drivers' visual attention and takeover performance in conditionally automated driving?
    Pan, Hengyan
    Payre, William
    Wang, Yonggang
    Gao, Zhixiang
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION SAFETY & SECURITY, 2025, 17 (01) : 97 - 123