Machine learning-based prediction model for hypofibrinogenemia after tigecycline therapy

被引:0
|
作者
Zhu, Jianping [1 ]
Zhao, Rui [1 ]
Yu, Zhenwei [1 ]
Li, Liucheng [1 ]
Wei, Jiayue [2 ]
Guan, Yan [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Sir Run Run Shaw Hosp, Sch Med, Pharm Dept, Hangzhou 310020, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Canc Hosp, Hangzhou 310022, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Tigecycline; Hypofibrinogenemia; Machine learning; Influencing factors; Prediction models; Survival model; RISK;
D O I
10.1186/s12911-024-02694-x
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundIn clinical practice, the incidence of hypofibrinogenemia (HF) after tigecycline (TGC) treatment significantly exceeds the probability claimed by drug manufacturers.ObjectiveWe aimed to identify the risk factors for TGC-associated HF and develop prediction and survival models for TGC-associated HF and the timing of TGC-associated HF.MethodsThis single-center retrospective cohort study included 222 patients who were prescribed TGC. First, we used binary logistic regression to screen the independent factors influencing TGC-associated HF, which were used as predictors to train the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), calibration curve, decision curve analysis (DCA), and clinical impact curve analysis (CICA) were used to evaluate the performance of the model in the verification cohort. Subsequently, we conducted survival analysis using the random survival forest (RSF) algorithm. A consistency index (C-index) was used to evaluate the accuracy of the RSF model in the verification cohort.ResultsBinary logistic regression identified nine independent factors influencing TGC-associated HF, and the XGBoost model was constructed using these nine predictors. The ROC and calibration curves showed that the model had good discrimination (areas under the ROC curves (AUC) = 0.792 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.668-0.915]) and calibration ability. In addition, DCA and CICA demonstrated good clinical practicability of this model. Notably, the RSF model showed good accuracy (C-index = 0.746 [95%CI, 0.652-0.820]) in the verification cohort. Stratifying patients treated with TGC based on the RSF model revealed a statistically significant difference in the mean survival time between the low- and high-risk groups.ConclusionsThe XGBoost model effectively predicts the risk of TGC-associated HF, whereas the RSF model has advantages in risk stratification. These two models have significant clinical practical value, with the potential to reduce the risk of TGC therapy.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A machine learning-based weather prediction model and its application on smart irrigation
    Khalifeh, Ala' F.
    AlQammaz, Abdullah Y.
    Abualigah, Laith
    Khasawneh, Ahmad M.
    Darabkh, Khalid A.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2022, 43 (02) : 1835 - 1842
  • [42] A machine learning-based spray prediction model for tomato powdery mildew disease
    Bhatia A.
    Chug A.
    Singh A.P.
    Singh R.P.
    Singh D.
    Indian Phytopathology, 2022, 75 (1) : 225 - 230
  • [43] A machine learning-based prediction model for gout in hyperuricemics: a nationwide cohort study
    Brikman, Shay
    Serfaty, Liel
    Abuhasira, Ran
    Schlesinger, Naomi
    Bieber, Amir
    Rappoport, Nadav
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2024, 63 (09) : 2411 - 2417
  • [44] Machine learning-based diffusion model for prediction of coronavirus-19 outbreak
    Raheja, Supriya
    Kasturia, Shreya
    Cheng, Xiaochun
    Kumar, Manoj
    NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2023, 35 (19): : 13755 - 13774
  • [45] A machine learning-based model for "In-time" prediction of periprosthetic joint infection
    Chen, Weishen
    Hu, Xuantao
    Gu, Chen
    Zhang, Zhaohui
    Zheng, Linli
    Pan, Baiqi
    Wu, Xiaoyu
    Sun, Wei
    Sheng, Puyi
    DIGITAL HEALTH, 2024, 10
  • [46] Machine learning-based prediction model for patients with recurrent Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia
    Li, Yuan
    Song, Shuang
    Zhu, Liying
    Zhang, Xiaorun
    Mou, Yijiao
    Lei, Maoxing
    Wang, Wenjing
    Tao, Zhen
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [47] Considerations and prospects for validating a machine learning-based choledocholithiasis prediction model Reply
    Steinway, Steven N.
    Caffo, Brian S.
    Akshintala, Venkata S.
    ENDOSCOPY, 2024, 56 (07) : 554 - 554
  • [48] Machine Learning-Based Production Prediction Model and Its Application in Duvernay Formation
    Guo, Zekun
    Wang, Hongjun
    Kong, Xiangwen
    Li Shen
    Jia, Yuepeng
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (17)
  • [49] Machine learning-based diffusion model for prediction of coronavirus-19 outbreak
    Supriya Raheja
    Shreya Kasturia
    Xiaochun Cheng
    Manoj Kumar
    Neural Computing and Applications, 2023, 35 : 13755 - 13774
  • [50] A Machine Learning-Based Intrauterine Growth Restriction (IUGR) Prediction Model for Newborns
    Deval, Ravi
    Saxena, Pallavi
    Pradhan, Dibyabhaba
    Mishra, Ashwani Kumar
    Jain, Arun Kumar
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2022, 89 (11): : 1140 - 1143