Aggregation methods and comparative study in time-to-event analysis models

被引:0
|
作者
Fernandez, Camila [1 ,3 ]
Chen, Chung Shue [2 ]
Gaillard, Pierre [3 ]
Silva, Alonso [2 ]
机构
[1] Sorbonne Univ, LPSM, 4 Pl Jussieu, F-75005 Paris, France
[2] Nokia Bell Labs, 12 Rue Jean Bart, F-91300 Paris, France
[3] INRIA Grenoble Rhone Alpes, 655 Ave Europe, F-38330 Montbonnot St Martin, France
关键词
Aggregation methods; Time-to-event analysis; Integrated Brier score; Concordance index; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; REGRESSION; DURATION; CANCER;
D O I
10.1007/s41060-024-00642-6
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Time-to-event analysis is a branch of statistics that has increased in popularity during the last decades due to its many application fields, such as predictive maintenance, customer churn prediction and population lifetime estimation. Our main contribution is to offer a deep understanding of the interactions between model assumptions and dataset characteristics, along with the effectiveness of different scoring metrics in assessing predictive accuracy and robustness. To this end, we review and compare the performance of several prediction models for time-to-event analysis. These consist of semi-parametric and parametric statistical models, in addition to machine learning approaches. Our study is carried out on four datasets and evaluated in two different scores (the integrated Brier score and concordance index). Moreover, we show how aggregation methods can improve the prediction accuracy and enhance the robustness of the prediction performance. We conclude the analysis with a simulation experiment in which we evaluate the factors influencing the performance ranking of the methods using both scores.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Modelling flowering of plants using time-to-event methods
    Ritz, Christian
    Pipper, Christian
    Yndgaard, Flemming
    Fredlund, Kenneth
    Steinrucken, Gerhard
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2010, 32 (02) : 155 - 161
  • [32] Modeling injury outcomes using time-to-event methods
    Clark, DE
    Ryan, LM
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1997, 42 (06): : 1129 - 1134
  • [33] Methods for Assessing Longitudinal Biomarkers of Time-to-Event Outcomes in CKD: A Simulation Study
    Liu, Qian
    Smith, Abigail R.
    Mariani, Laura H.
    Nair, Viji
    Zee, Jarcy
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2019, 14 (09): : 1315 - 1323
  • [34] Generalized survival models for correlated time-to-event data
    Liu, Xing-Rong
    Pawitan, Yudi
    Clements, Mark S.
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2017, 36 (29) : 4743 - 4762
  • [35] Boosting joint models for longitudinal and time-to-event data
    Waldmann, Elisabeth
    Taylor-Robinson, David
    Klein, Nadja
    Kneib, Thomas
    Pressler, Tania
    Schmid, Matthias
    Mayr, Andreas
    BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 59 (06) : 1104 - 1121
  • [36] Development and performance of npde for the evaluation of time-to-event models
    M. Cerou
    M. Lavielle
    K. Brendel
    M. Chenel
    E. Comets
    Pharmaceutical Research, 2018, 35
  • [37] Flowgraph models for multistate time-to-event data.
    Andersen, Per Krach
    BIOMETRICS, 2006, 62 (03) : 941 - 942
  • [38] Reflection on modern methods: Dynamic prediction using joint models of longitudinal and time-to-event data
    Andrinopoulou, Eleni-Rosalina
    Harhay, Michael O.
    Ratcliffe, Sarah J.
    Rizopoulos, Dimitris
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 50 (05) : 1731 - 1743
  • [39] Survival analysis—time-to-event data and censoring
    Tanujit Dey
    Stuart R. Lipsitz
    Zara Cooper
    Quoc-Dien Trinh
    Martin Krzywinski
    Naomi Altman
    Nature Methods, 2022, 19 : 906 - 908
  • [40] Time-To-Event Data: An Overview and Analysis Considerations
    Le-Rademacher, Jennifer
    Wang, Xiaofei
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 16 (07) : 1067 - 1074