LI-RADS v2018 category and imaging features: inter-modality agreement between contrast-enhanced CT, gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI, and extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI

被引:0
|
作者
Agnello, Francesco [1 ]
Cannella, Roberto [1 ]
Brancatelli, Giuseppe [1 ]
Galia, Massimo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Palermo, Dept Radiol, Policlin Paolo Giaccone, Via Vespro 127, I-90127 Palermo, Italy
来源
RADIOLOGIA MEDICA | 2024年 / 129卷 / 11期
关键词
LI-RADS; CT; MRI; Liver; Contrast media; GD-EOB-DTPA; FOCAL LIVER-LESIONS; SMALL HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; DELAYED PHASE; DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE; SIGNAL-INTENSITY; HEPATIC NODULES; CIRRHOTIC LIVER; ACID;
D O I
10.1007/s11547-024-01879-8
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeTo perform an intra-individual comparison of LI-RADS category and imaging features in patients at high risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on contrast-enhanced CT, gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI (EOB-MRI), and extracellular agent-enhanced MRI (ECA-MRI) and to analyze the diagnostic performance of each imaging modality.MethodThis retrospective study included cirrhotic patients with at least one LR-3, LR-4, LR-5, LR-M or LR-TIV observation imaged with at least two imaging modalities among CT, EOB-MRI, or ECA-MRI. Two radiologists evaluated the observations using the LI-RADS v2018 diagnostic algorithm. Reference standard included pathologic confirmation and imaging criteria according to LI-RADS v2018. Imaging features were compared between different exams using the McNemar test. Inter-modality agreement was calculated by using the weighted Cohen's kappa (k) test.ResultsA total of 144 observations (mean size 34.0 +/- 32.4 mm) in 96 patients were included. There were no significant differences in the detection of major and ancillary imaging features between the three imaging modalities. When considering all the observations, inter-modality agreement for category assignment was substantial between CT and EOB-MRI (k 0.60; 95%CI 0.44, 0.75), moderate between CT and ECA-MRI (k 0.46; 95%CI 0.22, 0.69) and substantial between EOB-MRI and ECA-MRI (k 0.72; 95%CI 0.59, 0.85). In observations smaller than 20 mm, inter-modality agreement was fair between CT and EOB-MRI (k 0.26; 95%CI 0.05, 0.47), moderate between CT and ECA-MRI (k 0.42; 95%CI -0.02, 0.88), and substantial between EOB-MRI and ECA-MRI (k 0.65; 95%CI 0.47, 0.82). ECA-MRI demonstrated the highest sensitivity (70%) and specificity (100%) when considering LR-5 as predictor of HCC.ConclusionsInter-modality agreement between CT, ECA-MRI, and EOB-MRI decreases in observations smaller than 20 mm. ECA-MRI has the provided higher sensitivity for the diagnosis of HCC.
引用
收藏
页码:1575 / 1586
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Extracellular contrast agent-enhanced MRI is as effective as gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI for predicting microvascular invasion in HCC
    Sheng, Liuji
    Wei, Hong
    Yang, Ting
    Yang, Jie
    Zhang, Lin
    Zhu, Xiaomei
    Jiang, Hanyu
    Song, Bin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 170
  • [12] Application of the CT/MRI LI-RADS Treatment Response Algorithm to Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: A Feasibility Study
    Ruan, Si-Min
    Cheng, Mei-Qing
    Huang, Hui
    Hu, Hang-Tong
    Li, Wei
    Xie, Xiao-Yan
    Lu, Ming-De
    Kuang, Ming
    Lin, Man-Xia
    Wang, Wei
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA, 2022, 9 : 437 - 451
  • [13] Assessment of arterial hypervascularity of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of contrast-enhanced US and gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MR imaging
    Sugimoto, Katsutoshi
    Moriyasu, Fuminori
    Shiraishi, Junji
    Saito, Kazuhiro
    Taira, Junichi
    Saguchi, Toru
    Imai, Yasuharu
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (06) : 1205 - 1213
  • [14] Assessment of arterial hypervascularity of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of contrast-enhanced US and gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MR imaging
    Katsutoshi Sugimoto
    Fuminori Moriyasu
    Junji Shiraishi
    Kazuhiro Saito
    Junichi Taira
    Toru Saguchi
    Yasuharu Imai
    European Radiology, 2012, 22 : 1205 - 1213
  • [15] Dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging techniques: CT and MRI
    O'Connor, J. P. B.
    Tofts, P. S.
    Miles, K. A.
    Parkes, L. M.
    Thompson, G.
    Jackson, A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2011, 84 : S112 - S120
  • [16] LI-RADS technical requirements for CT, MRI, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (vol 43, pg 56, 2017)
    Kambadakone, Avinash R.
    Fung, Alice
    Gupta, Rajan T.
    Hope, Thomas A.
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Lyshchik, Andrej
    Ganesan, Karthik
    Yaghmai, Vahid
    Guimaraes, Alexander R.
    Sahani, Dushyant V.
    Miller, Frank H.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 43 (01) : 240 - 240
  • [17] VALUE OF CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND LI-RADS 2017 IN PATIENTS AT HIGH RISK OF HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA: A COMPARISON STUDY WITH CT/MRI LI-RADS
    Ding, Jianmin
    Zhou, Yan
    Jing, Xiang
    HEPATOLOGY, 2020, 72 : 687A - 687A
  • [18] Fusion imaging of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced CT or MRI before radiofrequency ablation for liver cancers
    Bo, Xiao-Wan
    Xu, Hui-Xiong
    Wang, Dan
    Guo, Le-Hang
    Sun, Li-Ping
    Li, Xiao-Long
    Zhao, Chong-Ke
    He, Ya-Ping
    Liu, Bo-Ji
    Li, Dan-Dan
    Zhang, Kun
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 89 (1067):
  • [19] Severe acute pancreatitis: Contrast-enhanced CT and MRI features
    Piironen A.
    Abdominal Imaging, 2001, 26 (3): : 225 - 233
  • [20] Severe acute pancreatitis: contrast-enhanced CT and MRI features
    Piironen, A
    ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2001, 26 (03): : 225 - 233