LI-RADS v2018 category and imaging features: inter-modality agreement between contrast-enhanced CT, gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI, and extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI

被引:0
|
作者
Agnello, Francesco [1 ]
Cannella, Roberto [1 ]
Brancatelli, Giuseppe [1 ]
Galia, Massimo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Palermo, Dept Radiol, Policlin Paolo Giaccone, Via Vespro 127, I-90127 Palermo, Italy
来源
RADIOLOGIA MEDICA | 2024年 / 129卷 / 11期
关键词
LI-RADS; CT; MRI; Liver; Contrast media; GD-EOB-DTPA; FOCAL LIVER-LESIONS; SMALL HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; DELAYED PHASE; DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE; SIGNAL-INTENSITY; HEPATIC NODULES; CIRRHOTIC LIVER; ACID;
D O I
10.1007/s11547-024-01879-8
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeTo perform an intra-individual comparison of LI-RADS category and imaging features in patients at high risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on contrast-enhanced CT, gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI (EOB-MRI), and extracellular agent-enhanced MRI (ECA-MRI) and to analyze the diagnostic performance of each imaging modality.MethodThis retrospective study included cirrhotic patients with at least one LR-3, LR-4, LR-5, LR-M or LR-TIV observation imaged with at least two imaging modalities among CT, EOB-MRI, or ECA-MRI. Two radiologists evaluated the observations using the LI-RADS v2018 diagnostic algorithm. Reference standard included pathologic confirmation and imaging criteria according to LI-RADS v2018. Imaging features were compared between different exams using the McNemar test. Inter-modality agreement was calculated by using the weighted Cohen's kappa (k) test.ResultsA total of 144 observations (mean size 34.0 +/- 32.4 mm) in 96 patients were included. There were no significant differences in the detection of major and ancillary imaging features between the three imaging modalities. When considering all the observations, inter-modality agreement for category assignment was substantial between CT and EOB-MRI (k 0.60; 95%CI 0.44, 0.75), moderate between CT and ECA-MRI (k 0.46; 95%CI 0.22, 0.69) and substantial between EOB-MRI and ECA-MRI (k 0.72; 95%CI 0.59, 0.85). In observations smaller than 20 mm, inter-modality agreement was fair between CT and EOB-MRI (k 0.26; 95%CI 0.05, 0.47), moderate between CT and ECA-MRI (k 0.42; 95%CI -0.02, 0.88), and substantial between EOB-MRI and ECA-MRI (k 0.65; 95%CI 0.47, 0.82). ECA-MRI demonstrated the highest sensitivity (70%) and specificity (100%) when considering LR-5 as predictor of HCC.ConclusionsInter-modality agreement between CT, ECA-MRI, and EOB-MRI decreases in observations smaller than 20 mm. ECA-MRI has the provided higher sensitivity for the diagnosis of HCC.
引用
收藏
页码:1575 / 1586
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] New strategy of LI-RADS v2018 to improve the sensitivity for small hepatocellular carcinoma ≤ 3.0 cm on extracellular-contrast enhanced MRI
    Zhou, Jinhui
    Zhang, Yao
    Zhang, Jing
    Chen, Jingbiao
    Jiang, Hang
    Zhang, Linqi
    Zhong, Xi
    Zhang, Tianhui
    Chen, Lichun
    Wang, Yufeng
    Xu, Yikai
    Wang, Jin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 181
  • [22] Extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging for HCC diagnosis: prospective comparison with gadoxetic acid using LI-RADS
    Cha, Dong Ik
    Choi, Gyu Seong
    Kim, Young Kon
    Kim, Jong Man
    Kang, Tae Wook
    Song, Kyoung Doo
    Ahn, Soo Hyun
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (07) : 3723 - 3734
  • [23] Extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging for HCC diagnosis: prospective comparison with gadoxetic acid using LI-RADS
    Dong Ik Cha
    Gyu Seong Choi
    Young Kon Kim
    Jong Man Kim
    Tae Wook Kang
    Kyoung Doo Song
    Soo Hyun Ahn
    European Radiology, 2020, 30 : 3723 - 3734
  • [24] Enhancement patterns of focal liver masses: Discordance between contrast-enhanced sonography and contrast-enhanced CT and MRI
    Wilson, Stephanie R.
    Kim, Tae Kyoung
    Jang, Hyun-Jung
    Burns, Peter N.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 189 (01) : W7 - W12
  • [25] Prevalence and clinical significance of discordant LI-RADS® observations on multiphase contrast-enhanced MRI in patients with cirrhosis
    Takeshi Yokoo
    Amit G. Singal
    Alberto Diaz de Leon
    Lakshmi Ananthakrishnan
    David T. Fetzer
    Ivan Pedrosa
    Gaurav Khatri
    Abdominal Radiology, 2020, 45 : 177 - 187
  • [26] Prevalence and clinical significance of discordant LI-RADS® observations on multiphase contrast-enhanced MRI in patients with cirrhosis
    Yokoo, Takeshi
    Singal, Amit G.
    de Leon, Alberto Diaz
    Ananthakrishnan, Lakshmi
    Fetzer, David T.
    Pedrosa, Ivan
    Khatri, Gaurav
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 45 (01) : 177 - 187
  • [27] Comparison of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI sequences for measuring hepatic observation size and its implication of LI-RADS classification
    Choi, Ji Young
    Ha, Jiyeon
    Choi, Sang Hyun
    Kang, Hyo Jeong
    Kim, So Yeon
    Kim, Kyoung Won
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 47 (03) : 1024 - 1031
  • [28] LI-RADS version 2018 for hepatocellular carcinoma < 1.0 cm on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Jang, Hyeon Ji
    Choi, Sang Hyun
    Choi, Se Jin
    Choi, Won-Mook
    Byun, Jae Ho
    Won, Hyung Jin
    Shin, Yong Moon
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2023, 33 (08) : 5792 - 5800
  • [29] Comparison of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI sequences for measuring hepatic observation size and its implication of LI-RADS classification
    Ji Young Choi
    Jiyeon Ha
    Sang Hyun Choi
    Hyo Jeong Kang
    So Yeon Kim
    Kyoung Won Kim
    Abdominal Radiology, 2022, 47 : 1024 - 1031
  • [30] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound: Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (CEUS LI-RADS)
    Dietrich, Christoph F.
    Potthoff, Andrej
    Helmberger, Thomas
    Ignee, Andre
    Willmann, Juergen K.
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE, 2018, 56 (05): : 499 - 506