A finite element study on the risk of bone loss around posterior short implants in an atrophic mandible

被引:0
|
作者
Gialain, Ivan Onone [1 ,2 ]
Gantier-Takano, Marlene Kasumi [1 ]
da Silva, Leonardo Folmer Rodrigues [1 ]
Roscoe, Marina Guimaraes [1 ]
Pinhata-Baptista, Otavio Henrique [3 ,4 ]
Meira, Josete Barbosa Cruz [1 ]
Fok, Alex Siu Lun [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Dent, Dept Biomat & Oral Biol, Av Prof Lineu Prestes,2227, BR-05508000 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Cuiaba, Cuiaba, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Mil Hosp Sao Paulo Area, Dent Div, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Dent, Dept Stomatol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[5] Univ Minnesota, Minnesota Dent Res Ctr Biomat & Biomech, Sch Dent, Minneapolis, MN USA
关键词
Mandible; Bone resorption; Dental implant; Dental prostheses; Occlusal load; ITI CONSENSUS REPORT; STRESS-DISTRIBUTION; SURROUNDING BONE; VALIDATION; DIAMETER; QUALITY; DESIGN; CROWNS; LENGTH;
D O I
10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_24_00003
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the risk of bone loss around single short molar crown-supporting implants in an atrophic mandible. Methods: Implants of different lengths (L = 4 or 6 mm) and diameters (0 = 4.1 or 4.8 mm) were placed in the molar area of an atrophic mandible. Additional control mandible models were simulated for 4.1 mm diameter implants (L = 4, 6, 8, and 10 mm). A vertical masticatory load of 200 N was applied to three or six occlusal contact areas (3ca or 6ca) of the prosthetic crown. The bone strain energy density (SED) of 109.6 mu J/mm3 was assumed to be the pathological threshold for cortical bone. The peri-implant bone resorption risk index (PIBRri) was calculated by dividing the maximum SED of the crestal cortical bone by the SED pathological threshold. Results: Increasing the implant length from 4 to 6 mm, implant diameter from 4.1 to 4.8 mm, and number of contact areas from 3 to 6 reduced the SED and PIBRri values by approximately 20%, 35%, and 40%, respectively, when comparing pairs of models that isolated a specific variable. All models with 6ca had a low bone resorption risk (PIBRri<0.8), while the 04.1 short implant with 3ca had a medium (0.8 <= PIBRri <= 1.0) or high (PIBRri>1.0) resorption risk. Conclusions: Increasing the diameter or occlusal contact area of a 4 mm short implant in an atrophic mandible resulted in reduced bone resorption risks, similar to or lower than those observed in a regular mandible with standard-length implants.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 119
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Radiographic Evaluation of Crestal Bone Loss Around Dental Implants in Maxilla and Mandible: One Year Prospective Clinical Study
    Ajanovic, Muhamed
    Hamzic, Adis
    Redzepagic, Sead
    Kamber-cesir, Alma
    Kazazic, Lejla
    Tosum, Selma
    ACTA STOMATOLOGICA CROATICA, 2015, 49 (02) : 128 - 136
  • [42] Use of Tilted Implants in Treatment of the Atrophic Posterior Mandible: A Preliminary Report of a Novel Approach
    Pancko, Franklin
    Dyer, John
    Weisglass, Stephen
    Kraut, Richard A.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2010, 68 (02) : 407 - 413
  • [43] Semi-automated generation of bone loss defects around dental implants and its application in finite element analysis
    Jemaa, Hassen
    Eisenburger, Michael
    Greuling, Andreas
    COMPUTER METHODS IN BIOMECHANICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 27 (13) : 1756 - 1767
  • [44] Rehabilitation atrophic mandible with short dental implants and titanium plate: A case report
    Alvarenga, Rodrigo Lopez
    Akaki, Emilio
    Rodrigues Antunes de Souza, Ana Cristina
    de Souza, Leandro Napier
    REVISTA PORTUGUESA DE ESTOMATOLOGIA MEDICINA DENTARIA E CIRURGIA MAXILOFACIAL, 2013, 54 (04): : 217 - 221
  • [45] Does osteoporosis increase marginal bone loss around dental implants in the posterior of the maxilla?
    Tabrizi, R.
    Mousavi, F.
    Ghasemi, S.
    Ozkan, B. T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 50 (07) : 964 - 968
  • [46] Biomechanical analysis of the effects of implant diameter and bone quality in short implants placed in the atrophic posterior maxilla
    Chang, Shih-Hao
    Lin, Chun-Li
    Hsue, Shue-Sang
    Lin, Yang-Sung
    Huang, Shiang-Rung
    MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2012, 34 (02) : 153 - 160
  • [47] Staged reconstruction of the severely atrophic mandible with autogenous bone graft and endosteal implants
    Bell, RB
    Blakey, GH
    White, RP
    Hillebrand, DG
    Molina, A
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2002, 60 (10) : 1135 - 1141
  • [48] Rehabilitation With Implants After Bone Lid Surgery in the Posterior Mandible
    Sivolella, Stefano
    Brunello, Giulia
    Berengo, Mario
    De Biagi, Marleen
    Bacci, Christian
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 73 (08) : 1485 - 1492
  • [49] Effects of different inter-implant distances on the stress distribution around endosseous implants in posterior mandible: A 3D finite element analysis
    Simsek, B
    Erkmen, E
    Yilmaz, D
    Eser, A
    MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2006, 28 (03) : 199 - 213
  • [50] Outcomes of Placing Short Dental implants in the Posterior Mandible: A Retrospective Study of 124 Cases
    Grant, Bao-Thy N.
    Pancko, Franklin X.
    Kraut, Richard A.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2009, 67 (04) : 713 - 717