Effects of different inter-implant distances on the stress distribution around endosseous implants in posterior mandible: A 3D finite element analysis

被引:61
|
作者
Simsek, B
Erkmen, E
Yilmaz, D
Eser, A
机构
[1] Gazi Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, TR-06690 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Middle E Tech Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
inter-implant distance; dental implant; peri-implant structure; stress distribution; 3D finite elements analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.medengphy.2005.04.025
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of different inter-implant distances on stress distribution in the bone around the endosseous titanium implants under vertical, oblique and horizontal loads in the posterior mandibular edentulousim by finite element analysis (3D FEA). Materials and methods: 3D FEA models representing mandible and ITI (R) implant (Straumann, Waldenburg, Switzerland) were simulated. The distances in-between the units were set at 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 cm. Vertical (V) 70 degrees N, 60 degrees oblique (BL) 35 degrees N in buccolingual direction and horizontal (MD) 14 degrees N in mesiodistal direction loads were applied to each of these designs. The principal stresses (tensile and compressive stress) on each model were calculated using MSC MARC finite element analyze solver software. Results: The tensile stress (P-max) values have been evaluated that they rose at the cervical region of buccal side when the inter-implant distances increased under V and BL loads and they diminished while the inter-implant distances decreased. In short inter-implant distances the compressive stress (P-min) has been presented with increased values and found at the lingual surface of the cervical region. Discussion: The results of this study indicated that the magnitude of the stress was influenced by complex factors such as the direction of loads and the distance between adjacent fixtures. The stress occurring around fixtures differs significantly with various types of inter-implant distance. Conclusion: The evaluation of tensile and compressive stresses for cortical and cancellous bone under V,(MD)-M-1 and BL loading conditions in aspect of inter-implant distance shows; the 1.0 cm of inter-implant distance is the optimum distance for two fixture implantation. (c) 2005 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 213
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of stress distribution around splinted and nonsplinted implants with different crown height space in posterior mandible: A finite element analysis study
    Erdogan, Hamiyet Gungor
    Yilmaz, Burak
    Keles, Mert
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2024,
  • [2] Effects of Implant-Abutment Connection Type and Inter-Implant Distance on Inter-Implant Bone Stress and Microgap: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis
    Matsuoka, Takashi
    Nakano, Tamaki
    Yamaguchi, Satoshi
    Ono, Shinji
    Watanabe, Shota
    Sato, Takumi
    Yatani, Hirofumi
    MATERIALS, 2021, 14 (09)
  • [3] Parafunctional loading and occlusal device on stress distribution around implants: A 3D finite element analysis
    Borges Radaelli, Manuel Tomas
    Idogava, Henrique Takashi
    Spazzin, Aloisio Oro
    Noritomi, Pedro Yoshito
    Boscato, Noeli
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2018, 120 (04): : 565 - 572
  • [4] Effects of inter-implant distance and implant length on the response to frontal traumatic force of two anterior implants in an atrophic mandible: three-dimensional finite element analysis
    Kan, B.
    Coskunses, F. M.
    Mutlu, I.
    Ugur, L.
    Meral, D. G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 44 (07) : 908 - 913
  • [5] Biomechanical rationale for intentionally inclined implants in the posterior mandible using 3D finite element analysis
    Satoh, T
    Maeda, Y
    Komiyama, Y
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2005, 20 (04) : 533 - 539
  • [6] Outcome of Implant Diameter and Length on the Distribution of Stress with Immediate Loaded Implants: A 3D Finite Element Analysis
    Kavitha, G.
    Sonkesriya, Subhash
    Kumar, Anil K.
    Almutairi, Faris Jaser
    Parmar, Pravin M.
    Parihar, Anuj Singh
    Sonkar, Tanu Priya
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2023, 15 : S1329 - S1331
  • [7] Comparison of the rehabilitation of posterior atrophic edentulous mandible with different interforaminal implant placement concepts: a 3D finite element analysis
    Akca, B. S.
    Kucukkurt, S.
    JOURNAL OF OSSEOINTEGRATION, 2023, 15 (03) : 155 - 164
  • [8] 3D finite element analysis to detect stress distribution: spiral family implants
    Danza M.
    Zollino I.
    Paracchini L.
    Riccardo G.
    Fanali S.
    Carinci F.
    Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 2009, 8 (4) : 334 - 339
  • [9] Investigation of stress distribution in implant thread design: A 3D Finite Element Analysis
    Jackson Irudhayam, S.
    Hariram, V.
    Materials Today: Proceedings, 2021,
  • [10] Effects of Different Abutment Connection Designs on the Stress Distribution Around Five Different Implants: A 3-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis
    Balik, Ali
    Karatas, Meltem Ozdemir
    Keskin, Haluk
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2012, 38 (01) : 491 - 496