Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection Following Transrectal and Transperineal Biopsy: Results of the Prostate Biopsy Efficacy and Complications Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:10
|
作者
Mian, Badar M. [1 ]
Feustel, Paul J. [2 ]
Aziz, Asef [1 ]
Kaufman Jr, Ronald P. [1 ]
Bernstein, Adrien [1 ]
Fisher, Hugh A. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Albany Med Ctr, Dept Urol, 23 Hackett Blvd, Albany, NY 12208 USA
[2] Albany Med Ctr, Dept Res Adm, Albany, NY USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2024年 / 212卷 / 01期
关键词
prostate; biopsy; cancer; diagnosis;
D O I
10.1097/JU.0000000000003979
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose:The comparative effectiveness of transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer is not well understood. We conducted a randomized clinical trial to determine whether transperineal biopsy improves the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.Materials and Methods:Of the 840 men randomized, 93% were White, 44% had a previous biopsy, with a median age of 66 years and median PSA density of 0.14. Of these, 384 underwent transrectal and 398 underwent transperineal prostate biopsy. Prebiopsy prostate MRI was performed in 96% of men. Grade Group >= 2 prostate cancer was classified as clinically significant. Odds ratios were calculated using logistic regression to evaluate the effect of biopsy procedures on cancer detection rates.Results:The detection rates of clinically significant prostate cancer were 47.1% and 43.2% (odds ratio 1.17; 95% CI, 0.88-1.55) for transrectal and transperineal biopsy, respectively. Age, PSA density, clinical stage and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score were associated with the diagnosis of clinically significant cancer, whereas history of previous biopsy, anterior tumors, and biopsy procedure (transrectal or transperineal) were not. Clinically significant cancer detection rates in biopsy-na & iuml;ve men undergoing MRI-targeted transrectal or transperineal biopsy were 59% and 62%, respectively. The overall cancer detection rates following transrectal and transperineal biopsy were 72.1% and 70.4%, respectively.Conclusions:There was no significant difference noted in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer following transrectal or transperineal prostate biopsy. Urologists may utilize either biopsy procedure that best suits their patients' needs and practice setting.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 31
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Improving Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy
    Rastinehad, Ardeshir R.
    Turkbey, Baris
    Salami, Simpa S.
    Yaskiv, Oksana
    George, Arvin K.
    Fakhoury, Mathew
    Beecher, Karin
    Vira, Manish A.
    Kavoussi, Louis R.
    Siegel, David N.
    Villani, Robert
    Ben-Levi, Eran
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (06): : 1749 - 1754
  • [42] DETECTION OF CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER: A COMPARISON OF MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI AND PROSTATE BIOPSY
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Fiori, Cristian
    Mele, Fabrizio
    Manfredi, Matteo
    Grande, Susanna
    Cossu, Marco
    Cattaneo, Giovanni
    Bollito, Enrico
    Papotti, Mauro
    Russo, Filippo
    Regge, Daniele
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 33 (05) : 2324 - 2325
  • [43] Statistical analysis plan for the TRANSLATE (TRANSrectal biopsy versus Local Anaesthetic Transperineal biopsy Evaluation of potentially clinically significant prostate cancer) multicentre randomised controlled trial
    Marian, Ioana R.
    Ooms, Alexander
    Holmes, Jane
    Parkes, Matthew J.
    Lamb, Alastair D.
    Bryant, Richard J.
    TRIALS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [44] Optimal biopsy approach for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Ippoliti, Simona
    Fletcher, Peter
    Orecchia, Luca
    Miano, Roberto
    Kastner, Christof
    Barrett, Tristan
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 95 (1131):
  • [45] Detection of prostate cancer:: A comparative study of the diagnostic efficacy of sextant transrectal versus sextant transperineal biopsy
    Vis, AN
    Boerma, MO
    Ciatto, S
    Hoedemaeker, RF
    Schröder, FH
    van der Kwast, TH
    UROLOGY, 2000, 56 (04) : 617 - 621
  • [46] A systematic review with meta-analysis of transrectal prostate biopsy versus transperineal prostate biopsy for detecting prostate cancer
    Winter, Matthew
    Garcia, Cindy
    Bergersen, Philip
    Woo, Henry
    Chalasani, Venu
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 112 : 22 - 22
  • [47] Transperineal extended biopsy improves the clinically significant prostate cancer detection rate: A comparative study of 6 and 12 biopsy cores
    Takenaka, A
    Hara, R
    Hyodo, Y
    Ishimura, T
    Sakai, Y
    Fujioka, H
    Fujii, T
    Jo, Y
    Fujisawa, M
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 13 (01) : 10 - 14
  • [48] Common errors, pitfalls, and management of complications of prostate biopsy The most common diagnostic and procedural challenges of transrectal fusion prostate biopsy in the initial diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Enzinger, Benazir
    Pfitzinger, Paulo Leonardo
    Ebner, Benedikt
    Ivanova, Troya
    Volz, Yannic
    Apfelbeck, Maria
    Kazmierczak, Philipp
    Stief, Christian
    Chaloupka, Michael
    UROLOGIE, 2023, 62 (05): : 479 - 486
  • [49] Transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy in prostate cancer detection: a systematic review with meta-analysis
    Garcia, C.
    Winter, M.
    Bergersen, P.
    Woo, H.
    Chalasani, V.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 117 : 38 - 38
  • [50] Meta-Analysis of Transperineal and Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy in the Detection of Prostate Cancer
    Fang, Yanchun
    Xia, Linv
    Lu, Haiyan
    He, Hailing
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2024, 77 (09): : 1089 - 1099