Optimal biopsy approach for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer

被引:13
|
作者
Ippoliti, Simona [1 ]
Fletcher, Peter [2 ]
Orecchia, Luca [2 ,3 ]
Miano, Roberto [3 ,4 ]
Kastner, Christof [2 ]
Barrett, Tristan [5 ]
机构
[1] Queen Elizabeth Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Urol Dept, Kings Lynn, Norfolk, England
[2] Cambridge Univ Hosp, Urol Dept, Cambridge, England
[3] Policlin Tor Vergata Fdn, Urol Unit, Rome, Italy
[4] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dept Surg Sci, Div Urol, Rome, Italy
[5] Cambridge Univ Hosp, Radiol Dept, Cambridge, England
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY | 2022年 / 95卷 / 1131期
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; FOCAL THERAPY; MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; ULTRASOUND FUSION; TARGETED BIOPSY; MAPPING BIOPSY; TRANSPERINEAL; REGISTRATION; INFECTION;
D O I
10.1259/bjr.20210413
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Prostate cancer (PCa) diagnostic and therapeutic work-up has evolved significantly in the last decade, with prebiopsy multiparametric MRI now widely endorsed within international guidelines. There is potential to move away from the widespread use of systematic biopsy cores and towards an individualised risk-stratified approach. However, the evidence on the optimal biopsy approach remains heterogeneous, and the aim of this review is to highlight the most relevant features following a critical assessment of the literature. The commonest biopsy approaches are via the transperineal (TP) or transrectal (TR) routes. The former is considered more advantageous due to its negligible risk of post-procedural sepsis and reduced need for antimicrobial prophylaxis: the more recent development of local anaesthetic (LA) methods now makes this approach feasible in the clinic. Beyond this, several techniques are available, including cognitive registration, MRI-Ultrasound fusion imaging and direct MRI in-bore guided biopsy. Evidence shows that performing targeted biopsies reduces the number of cores required and can achieve acceptable rates of detection whilst helping to minimise complications and reducing pathologist workloads and costs to health-care facilities. Pre-biopsy MRI has revolutionised the diagnostic pathway for PCa, and optimising the biopsy process is now a focus. Combining MR imaging, TP biopsy and a more widespread use of LA in an outpatient setting seems a reasonable solution to balance health-care costs and benefits, however, local choices are likely to depend on the expertise and experience of clinicians and on the technology available.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Detection of clinically significant cancer in the anterior prostate by transperineal biopsy
    Cowan, Tim
    Baker, Emily
    McCray, Gabriella
    Reeves, Fairleigh
    Houlihan, Kimberley
    Johns-Putra, Lydia
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 126 : 33 - 37
  • [2] DETECTION OF CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER: A COMPARISON OF MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI AND PROSTATE BIOPSY
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Fiori, Cristian
    Mele, Fabrizio
    Manfredi, Matteo
    Grande, Susanna
    Cossu, Marco
    Cattaneo, Giovanni
    Bollito, Enrico
    Papotti, Mauro
    Russo, Filippo
    Regge, Daniele
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 33 (05) : 2324 - 2325
  • [3] Is systematic sextant biopsy suitable for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer?
    Manseck, A
    Froehner, M
    Oehlschlaeger, S
    Hakenberg, O
    Friedrich, K
    Theissig, F
    Wirth, MP
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2000, 65 (02) : 80 - 83
  • [4] MIDLINE PROSTATE LESIONS: FUSION BIOPSY IMPROVES DETECTION OF CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT CANCER
    Muthigi, Akhil
    George, Arvin
    Kongnyuy, Michael
    Sidana, Abhinav
    Shakir, Nabeel
    Kadakia, Meet
    Kilchevsky, Amichai
    Frye, Thomas
    Su, Daniel
    Merino, Maria
    Turkbey, Baris
    Choyke, Peter
    Wood, Bradford
    Pinto, Peter
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E175 - E175
  • [5] Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer after negative fusion and systematic biopsy
    Twum-Ampofo, Jeffrey
    Ceraolo, Carl
    Gusev, Andrew
    Feldman, Adam S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (06)
  • [6] Clinically significant prostate cancer detection with MRI-US Fusion biopsy
    Gnanappiragasam, S.
    Redmond, E. J.
    McEvoy, E.
    Conroy, T.
    Ward, E.
    McDermott, T. E. D.
    Thomas, A. J.
    Flynn, R. J.
    Lynch, T. H.
    Manecksha, R. P.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 120 : 36 - 36
  • [7] Can General Anesthesia Facilitate the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Prostate Fusion Biopsy?
    Yakut, Emrah
    ANDROLOGIA, 2024, 2024
  • [8] Multiparametric MRI Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy for Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Eliminates the Systemic Prostate Biopsy
    Matulevicius, Augustinas
    Bakavicius, Arnas
    Ulys, Albertas
    Trakymas, Mantas
    Usinskiene, Jurgita
    Naruseviciute, Ieva
    Sabaliauskaite, Rasa
    Zukauskaite, Kristina
    Jarmalaite, Sonata
    Jankevicius, Feliksas
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (19):
  • [9] Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Improves the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer among Men on Active Surveillance
    Meyer, Alexa R.
    Mamawala, Mufaddal
    Winoker, Jared S.
    Landis, Patricia
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Macura, Katarzyna J.
    Allaf, Mohamad E.
    Partin, Alan W.
    Pavlovich, Christian P.
    Gorin, Michael A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 205 (04): : 1069 - 1074
  • [10] Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in MRI-Negative Prostate Zones: Saturation Biopsy is Necessary
    Winyard, J. C.
    Wong, K. W. E.
    Khan, M. A. K.
    JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2022, 256 : S12 - S12