Common errors, pitfalls, and management of complications of prostate biopsy The most common diagnostic and procedural challenges of transrectal fusion prostate biopsy in the initial diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Enzinger, Benazir [1 ]
Pfitzinger, Paulo Leonardo [1 ]
Ebner, Benedikt [1 ]
Ivanova, Troya [1 ]
Volz, Yannic [1 ]
Apfelbeck, Maria [1 ]
Kazmierczak, Philipp [2 ]
Stief, Christian [1 ]
Chaloupka, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] LMU Klinikum, Urol Klin & Poliklin, Marchioninistr 15, D-81377 Munich, Germany
[2] LMU Klinikum, Klinik & Poliklin Radiol, Marchioninistr 15, D-81377 Munich, Germany
来源
UROLOGIE | 2023年 / 62卷 / 05期
关键词
Prostate cancer; Risk stratification; Fusion biopsy; Transperineal approach; Infections; ULTRASOUND-GUIDED BIOPSY; INFECTIOUS COMPLICATIONS; RISK CALCULATOR; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1007/s00120-023-02063-y
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Transrectal (TR) prostate biopsy is the gold standard in diagnosis of prostate cancer (PC). It requires a precise and safe technique for sample acquisition.Objective: Several approaches will be discussed to avoid overdiagnosis, false-negative results, and complications of the procedure.Materials and methods: We analyzed national and European guidelines, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, as well as prospective and retrospective studies to describe current trends in indication and performance of biopsies.Results: Incorporation of risk calculators and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) into daily routine reduces biopsy rates and results in a more precise diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC). Combination of random- and MRI-fusion guided biopsy-but also extending the radius of sampling by 10 mm beyond the MRI lesion and a transperineal (TP) sampling approach - lead to a higher tumor-detection rate. Bleeding is the most common complication after prostate biopsy and is usually self-limiting. Postbiopsy infection rates can be reduced through TP biopsy.Conclusion: TR MRI-fusion guided biopsy is a widely acknowledged tool in primary diagnostics of csPC. Higher detection rates and safety can be achieved through a TP sampling approach.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 486
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Häufige Fehler, „Pitfalls“ und Komplikationsmanagement der ProstatabiopsieDie häufigsten diagnostischen und prozeduralen Herausforderungen der transrektalen Fusionsbiopsie der Prostata bei Erstdiagnose eines klinisch signifikanten ProstatakarzinomsCommon errors, pitfalls, and management of complications of prostate biopsyThe most common diagnostic and procedural challenges of transrectal fusion prostate biopsy in the initial diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Benazir Enzinger
    Paulo Leonardo Pfitzinger
    Benedikt Ebner
    Troya Ivanova
    Yannic Volz
    Maria Apfelbeck
    Philipp Kazmierczak
    Christian Stief
    Michael Chaloupka
    Die Urologie, 2023, 62 (5) : 479 - 486
  • [2] Diagnostic performance of targeted transrectal MRI-Ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer
    Yuwono, A.
    Tan, T. -W.
    Yeow, Y.
    Lee, C. -H.
    Tan, C. -H.
    Chong, K. -T.
    Lee, Y. -M.
    Png, K. -S.
    Tan, Y. -K.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 119 : 19 - 19
  • [3] Utility of MRI fusion-targeted transrectal prostate biopsy and prostate health index in detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Leow, J.
    Yeow, Y.
    Tan, T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 26 : 84 - 85
  • [4] Utility of MRI fusion-targeted transrectal prostate biopsy and prostate health index detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Yeow, Y.
    Leow, J.
    Tan, T. W.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 123 : 31 - 31
  • [5] Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection Following Transrectal and Transperineal Biopsy: Results of the Prostate Biopsy Efficacy and Complications Randomized Clinical Trial
    Mian, Badar M.
    Feustel, Paul J.
    Aziz, Asef
    Kaufman Jr, Ronald P.
    Bernstein, Adrien
    Fisher, Hugh A. G.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 212 (01): : 21 - 31
  • [6] Improving Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy
    Rastinehad, Ardeshir R.
    Turkbey, Baris
    Salami, Simpa S.
    Yaskiv, Oksana
    George, Arvin K.
    Fakhoury, Mathew
    Beecher, Karin
    Vira, Manish A.
    Kavoussi, Louis R.
    Siegel, David N.
    Villani, Robert
    Ben-Levi, Eran
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (06): : 1749 - 1754
  • [7] The role of MRI/TRUS fusion biopsy in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Benelli, Andrea
    Vaccaro, Chiara
    Guzzo, Sonia
    Nedbal, Carlotta
    Varca, Virginia
    Gregori, Andrea
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN UROLOGY, 2020, 12
  • [8] Multiparametric MRI Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy for Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Eliminates the Systemic Prostate Biopsy
    Matulevicius, Augustinas
    Bakavicius, Arnas
    Ulys, Albertas
    Trakymas, Mantas
    Usinskiene, Jurgita
    Naruseviciute, Ieva
    Sabaliauskaite, Rasa
    Zukauskaite, Kristina
    Jarmalaite, Sonata
    Jankevicius, Feliksas
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (19):
  • [9] Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection Following Transrectal and Transperineal Biopsy: Results of the Prostate Biopsy Efficacy and Complications Randomized Clinical Trial Editorial Comment
    Fang, Andrew M.
    Gregg, Justin R.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 212 (01): : 31 - 31
  • [10] IS THE FUSION BIOPSY HELPFUL IN DETECTING CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER? OUR INITIAL EXPERIENCE
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Manfredi, Matteo
    Cossu, Marco
    Mele, Fabrizio
    Bollito, Enrico
    Papotti, Mauro
    Serra, Nicoletta
    Ottaviano, Giulia
    Moretti, Tomas
    Veltri, Andrea
    De Pascale, Agostino
    Russo, Filippo
    Cirillo, Stefano
    Fiori, Cristian
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 35 (06) : 3721 - 3721