Common errors, pitfalls, and management of complications of prostate biopsy The most common diagnostic and procedural challenges of transrectal fusion prostate biopsy in the initial diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Enzinger, Benazir [1 ]
Pfitzinger, Paulo Leonardo [1 ]
Ebner, Benedikt [1 ]
Ivanova, Troya [1 ]
Volz, Yannic [1 ]
Apfelbeck, Maria [1 ]
Kazmierczak, Philipp [2 ]
Stief, Christian [1 ]
Chaloupka, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] LMU Klinikum, Urol Klin & Poliklin, Marchioninistr 15, D-81377 Munich, Germany
[2] LMU Klinikum, Klinik & Poliklin Radiol, Marchioninistr 15, D-81377 Munich, Germany
来源
UROLOGIE | 2023年 / 62卷 / 05期
关键词
Prostate cancer; Risk stratification; Fusion biopsy; Transperineal approach; Infections; ULTRASOUND-GUIDED BIOPSY; INFECTIOUS COMPLICATIONS; RISK CALCULATOR; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1007/s00120-023-02063-y
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Transrectal (TR) prostate biopsy is the gold standard in diagnosis of prostate cancer (PC). It requires a precise and safe technique for sample acquisition.Objective: Several approaches will be discussed to avoid overdiagnosis, false-negative results, and complications of the procedure.Materials and methods: We analyzed national and European guidelines, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, as well as prospective and retrospective studies to describe current trends in indication and performance of biopsies.Results: Incorporation of risk calculators and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) into daily routine reduces biopsy rates and results in a more precise diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC). Combination of random- and MRI-fusion guided biopsy-but also extending the radius of sampling by 10 mm beyond the MRI lesion and a transperineal (TP) sampling approach - lead to a higher tumor-detection rate. Bleeding is the most common complication after prostate biopsy and is usually self-limiting. Postbiopsy infection rates can be reduced through TP biopsy.Conclusion: TR MRI-fusion guided biopsy is a widely acknowledged tool in primary diagnostics of csPC. Higher detection rates and safety can be achieved through a TP sampling approach.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 486
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prostate cancer volume estimations based on transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy in order to predict clinically significant prostate cancer
    Konyalioglu, Ersin
    Tarhan, Huseyin
    Cakmak, Ozgur
    Pala, Emel Ebru
    Zorlu, Ferruh
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2015, 41 (03): : 442 - 448
  • [32] MIDLINE PROSTATE LESIONS: FUSION BIOPSY IMPROVES DETECTION OF CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT CANCER
    Muthigi, Akhil
    George, Arvin
    Kongnyuy, Michael
    Sidana, Abhinav
    Shakir, Nabeel
    Kadakia, Meet
    Kilchevsky, Amichai
    Frye, Thomas
    Su, Daniel
    Merino, Maria
    Turkbey, Baris
    Choyke, Peter
    Wood, Bradford
    Pinto, Peter
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E175 - E175
  • [33] Clinically significant prostate cancer detection with MRI-US Fusion biopsy
    Gnanappiragasam, S.
    Redmond, E. J.
    McEvoy, E.
    Conroy, T.
    Ward, E.
    McDermott, T. E. D.
    Thomas, A. J.
    Flynn, R. J.
    Lynch, T. H.
    Manecksha, R. P.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 120 : 36 - 36
  • [34] Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer after negative fusion and systematic biopsy
    Twum-Ampofo, Jeffrey
    Ceraolo, Carl
    Gusev, Andrew
    Feldman, Adam S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (06)
  • [35] Predictors for the detection of prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer using TRUS-guided biopsy in patients with negative initial biopsy results
    Yoo, Sangjun
    Park, Juhyun
    Cho, Sung Yong
    Cho, Min Chul
    Ku, Ja Hyeon
    Son, Hwancheol
    Kwak, Cheol
    Kim, Hyeon Hoe
    Jeong, Hyeon
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 36 (07) : 1047 - 1053
  • [36] Predictors for the detection of prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer using TRUS-guided biopsy in patients with negative initial biopsy results
    Sangjun Yoo
    Juhyun Park
    Sung Yong Cho
    Min Chul Cho
    Ja Hyeon Ku
    Hwancheol Son
    Cheol Kwak
    Hyeon Hoe Kim
    Hyeon Jeong
    World Journal of Urology, 2018, 36 : 1047 - 1053
  • [37] Effectiveness of Bi-Parametric MR/US Fusion Biopsy for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Prostate Biopsy Naive Men
    Kim, Young Joo
    Huh, Jung Sik
    Park, Kyung Kgi
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 60 (04) : 346 - 351
  • [38] Re: Transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate. Do enemas decrease clinically significant complications?
    Terris, MK
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (05): : 2145 - 2146
  • [39] MRI Fusion-Targeted Transrectal Prostate Biopsy and the Role of Prostate-Specific Antigen Density and Prostate Health Index for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Southeast Asian Men
    Tan, Teck Wei
    Png, Keng Siang
    Lee, Chau Hung
    Yuwono, Arianto
    Yeow, Yuyi
    Chong, Kian Tai
    Lee, Yee Mun
    Tan, Cher Heng
    Tan, Yung Khan
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2017, 31 (11) : 1111 - 1116
  • [40] Re: Improving Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: MRI/TRUS Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy
    Villers, Arnauld
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 65 (06) : 1218 - 1219