The Impact on Birth Outcomes of Sonographic Fetal Weight Estimation in Neonatal Macrosomia

被引:0
|
作者
Sgayer, Inshirah [1 ,2 ]
Nskovica, Karina [1 ]
Murkhovskyi, Iuliia [1 ]
Abu Shqara, Raneen [1 ,2 ]
Bilyk, Artyom [1 ]
Lowenstein, Lior [1 ,2 ]
Wolf, Maya Frank [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Galilee Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, IL-22100 Nahariyya, Israel
[2] Bar Ilan Univ, Azrieli Fac Med, Safed, Israel
关键词
sonographic estimated fetal weight; macrosomic newborns; cesarean delivery; primiparity; diabetes mellitus; maternal obesity; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CESAREAN DELIVERY; ULTRASOUND; WOMEN; IDENTIFICATION; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1055/s-0044-1786743
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective Our objective was to examine the association between sonographic estimated fetal weight (EFW) and obstetrical and neonatal outcomes in women with neonatal macrosomia. Study Design This study, conducted at a tertiary university-affiliated hospital from 2017 to 2021, compared obstetrical and neonatal outcomes between two groups of women who deliveredmacrosomic newborns (actual birthweight >= 4,000 g): (1) those with EFW >= 3,800 g (suspected impending macrosomia) and ( 2) those with EFW < 3,800 g (unsuspected impending macrosomia). Results During the study period, 854 women with neonatal macrosomia attempted vaginal delivery. Only 9.2% had a sonographic EFW >= 4,000 g. Among women with EFW >= 3,800 g (n = 317) compared with EFW< 3,800 g (n = 537), the cesarean delivery ( CD) rate was higher ( 17.0 vs. 10.5%, p = 0.004) and the operative delivery rate was lower (3.2 vs. 0.6%, p = 0.015). Among primiparous women, the CD rate was higher among those with EFW >= 3,800 versus <3,800 g ( 37.3 vs. 23.2%, p = 0.033). EFW >= 3,800 g was associated with CD, regardless of predelivery body mass index, parity, diabetes mellitus, maximal fetal weight at previous deliveries, actual birthweight, and labor induction (p = 0.014). EFW >= 3,800 g and diabetes mellitus were independent predictors of CD. Among women with EFW >= 3,800 g and diabetes mellitus, the risk of CD was double that of those without diabetes and with EFW >= 3,800 g (31.4% vs. 15.2%, p = 0.02), although their actual birthweights were similar. Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes were similar between those with sonographic EFW >= 3,800 and< 3,800 g. Conclusion Larger EFW increased CD risk among pregnancies with actual neonatal macrosomia. Antenatally suspectedmacrosomiamight alter labormanagement due to concerns for potential complications, especially when associated with primiparity, diabetes mellitus, or maternal obesity. The increase in the CD rate did not show an association with improved maternal and neonatal outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Birth weight discordance and adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes among triplets in the United States
    Jacobs, AR
    Demissie, K
    Jain, NJ
    Kinzler, WL
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 101 (05): : 909 - 914
  • [42] MACROSOMIA - MATERNAL, FETAL, AND NEONATAL IMPLICATIONS
    MODANLOU, HD
    DORCHESTER, WL
    THOROSIAN, A
    FREEMAN, RK
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1980, 55 (04): : 420 - 424
  • [43] MACROSOMIA - MATERNAL, FETAL AND NEONATAL IMPLICATIONS
    MODANLOU, HD
    DORCHESTER, WL
    THOROSIAN, A
    FREEMAN, RK
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1980, 28 (01): : A124 - A124
  • [44] The association of fetal macrosomia and neonatal hypoglycaemia
    Moodley, T. R.
    Maharaj, N. R.
    Moodley, J.
    SAJOG-SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2023, 29 (01):
  • [45] Receiver operating characteristic curves of sonographic estimated fetal weight for prediction of macrosomia in prolonged pregnancies
    OReillyGreen, CP
    Divon, MY
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 9 (06) : 403 - 408
  • [46] The impact of early amniotomy on delivery outcomes in pregnancies with fetal macrosomia
    Touval, Or
    Cohen, Gal
    Heresco, Lior
    Biron-Shental, Tal
    Kovo, Michal
    Schreiber, Hanoch
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 230 (01) : S609 - S610
  • [47] Accuracy of sonographic estimated fetal weight in suspected macrosomia: the likelihood of overestimating and underestimating the true birthweight
    Zafman, Kelly B.
    Bergh, Eric
    Fox, Nathan S.
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2020, 33 (06): : 967 - 972
  • [48] Fetal macrosomia in home and birth center births in the United States: Maternal, fetal, and newborn outcomes
    Pillai, Sabrina
    Cheyney, Melissa
    Everson, Courtney L.
    Bovbjerg, Marit L.
    BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2020, 47 (04): : 409 - 417
  • [49] Fetal macrosomia and pregnancy outcomes
    Ju, Hong
    Chadha, Yogesh
    Donovan, Tim
    O'Rourke, Peter
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2009, 49 (05): : 504 - 509
  • [50] Sonographic Prediction of Fetal Macrosomia The Consequences of False Diagnosis
    Melamed, Nir
    Yogev, Yariv
    Meizner, Israel
    Mashiach, Reuven
    Ben-Haroush, Avi
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2010, 29 (02) : 225 - 230