The Impact on Birth Outcomes of Sonographic Fetal Weight Estimation in Neonatal Macrosomia

被引:0
|
作者
Sgayer, Inshirah [1 ,2 ]
Nskovica, Karina [1 ]
Murkhovskyi, Iuliia [1 ]
Abu Shqara, Raneen [1 ,2 ]
Bilyk, Artyom [1 ]
Lowenstein, Lior [1 ,2 ]
Wolf, Maya Frank [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Galilee Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, IL-22100 Nahariyya, Israel
[2] Bar Ilan Univ, Azrieli Fac Med, Safed, Israel
关键词
sonographic estimated fetal weight; macrosomic newborns; cesarean delivery; primiparity; diabetes mellitus; maternal obesity; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CESAREAN DELIVERY; ULTRASOUND; WOMEN; IDENTIFICATION; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1055/s-0044-1786743
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective Our objective was to examine the association between sonographic estimated fetal weight (EFW) and obstetrical and neonatal outcomes in women with neonatal macrosomia. Study Design This study, conducted at a tertiary university-affiliated hospital from 2017 to 2021, compared obstetrical and neonatal outcomes between two groups of women who deliveredmacrosomic newborns (actual birthweight >= 4,000 g): (1) those with EFW >= 3,800 g (suspected impending macrosomia) and ( 2) those with EFW < 3,800 g (unsuspected impending macrosomia). Results During the study period, 854 women with neonatal macrosomia attempted vaginal delivery. Only 9.2% had a sonographic EFW >= 4,000 g. Among women with EFW >= 3,800 g (n = 317) compared with EFW< 3,800 g (n = 537), the cesarean delivery ( CD) rate was higher ( 17.0 vs. 10.5%, p = 0.004) and the operative delivery rate was lower (3.2 vs. 0.6%, p = 0.015). Among primiparous women, the CD rate was higher among those with EFW >= 3,800 versus <3,800 g ( 37.3 vs. 23.2%, p = 0.033). EFW >= 3,800 g was associated with CD, regardless of predelivery body mass index, parity, diabetes mellitus, maximal fetal weight at previous deliveries, actual birthweight, and labor induction (p = 0.014). EFW >= 3,800 g and diabetes mellitus were independent predictors of CD. Among women with EFW >= 3,800 g and diabetes mellitus, the risk of CD was double that of those without diabetes and with EFW >= 3,800 g (31.4% vs. 15.2%, p = 0.02), although their actual birthweights were similar. Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes were similar between those with sonographic EFW >= 3,800 and< 3,800 g. Conclusion Larger EFW increased CD risk among pregnancies with actual neonatal macrosomia. Antenatally suspectedmacrosomiamight alter labormanagement due to concerns for potential complications, especially when associated with primiparity, diabetes mellitus, or maternal obesity. The increase in the CD rate did not show an association with improved maternal and neonatal outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Accuracy and precision of sonographic fetal weight estimation in Sweden
    Lindstrom, Linda
    Cnattingius, Sven
    Axelsson, Ove
    Granfors, Michaela
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2023, 102 (06) : 699 - 707
  • [32] Birth weight estimation - A sonographic model for Pakistani population
    Akhtar, Waseem
    Ali, Arif
    Aslam, Mubashir
    Saeed, Farah
    Salman
    Ahmad, Nadeem
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 60 (07) : 517 - 520
  • [33] Estimation of fetal weight: a comparison of clinical and sonographic methods
    Mgbafulu, C. C.
    Ajah, L. O.
    Umeora, O. U. J.
    Ibekwe, P. C.
    Ezeonu, P. O.
    Orji, M.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 39 (05) : 639 - 646
  • [34] Accuracy of sonographic fetal weight estimation: a matter of presentation
    Melamed, N.
    Ben-Haroush, A.
    Meizner, I.
    Mashiach, R.
    Yogev, Y.
    Pardo, J.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 38 (04) : 418 - 424
  • [35] Sonographic fetal weight estimation: Which model is best?
    Yogev, Yariv
    Mashiach, Reuven
    Meizner, Israel
    Ben-Haroush, Av
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 197 (06) : S60 - S60
  • [36] Accuracy and precision of sonographic fetal weight estimation in Sweden
    Lindstrom, Linda
    Cnattingius, Sven
    Axelsson, Ove
    Granfors, Michaela
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2023, 102 : 60 - 60
  • [37] Sonographic fetal weight estimation - is there more to it than just fetal measurements?
    Barel, Oshri
    Maymon, Ron
    Vaknin, Zvi
    Tovbin, Josef
    Smorgick, Noam
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2014, 34 (01) : 50 - 55
  • [38] INFLUENCE OF FETAL GROWTH-PATTERNS ON SONOGRAPHIC ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHT
    SIMON, NV
    LEVISKY, JS
    SHEARER, DM
    OLEAR, MS
    FLOOD, JT
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 1987, 15 (06) : 376 - 383
  • [39] Fetal macrosomia risk estimation
    Stanislaw, H.
    Nahum, G. G.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 31 (02) : 227 - 228
  • [40] Derivation of combination birth-weight prediction equations to identify fetal macrosomia
    Nahum, G. G.
    Stanislaw, H.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 35 (04) : 503 - 504