The Impact on Birth Outcomes of Sonographic Fetal Weight Estimation in Neonatal Macrosomia

被引:0
|
作者
Sgayer, Inshirah [1 ,2 ]
Nskovica, Karina [1 ]
Murkhovskyi, Iuliia [1 ]
Abu Shqara, Raneen [1 ,2 ]
Bilyk, Artyom [1 ]
Lowenstein, Lior [1 ,2 ]
Wolf, Maya Frank [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Galilee Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, IL-22100 Nahariyya, Israel
[2] Bar Ilan Univ, Azrieli Fac Med, Safed, Israel
关键词
sonographic estimated fetal weight; macrosomic newborns; cesarean delivery; primiparity; diabetes mellitus; maternal obesity; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CESAREAN DELIVERY; ULTRASOUND; WOMEN; IDENTIFICATION; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1055/s-0044-1786743
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective Our objective was to examine the association between sonographic estimated fetal weight (EFW) and obstetrical and neonatal outcomes in women with neonatal macrosomia. Study Design This study, conducted at a tertiary university-affiliated hospital from 2017 to 2021, compared obstetrical and neonatal outcomes between two groups of women who deliveredmacrosomic newborns (actual birthweight >= 4,000 g): (1) those with EFW >= 3,800 g (suspected impending macrosomia) and ( 2) those with EFW < 3,800 g (unsuspected impending macrosomia). Results During the study period, 854 women with neonatal macrosomia attempted vaginal delivery. Only 9.2% had a sonographic EFW >= 4,000 g. Among women with EFW >= 3,800 g (n = 317) compared with EFW< 3,800 g (n = 537), the cesarean delivery ( CD) rate was higher ( 17.0 vs. 10.5%, p = 0.004) and the operative delivery rate was lower (3.2 vs. 0.6%, p = 0.015). Among primiparous women, the CD rate was higher among those with EFW >= 3,800 versus <3,800 g ( 37.3 vs. 23.2%, p = 0.033). EFW >= 3,800 g was associated with CD, regardless of predelivery body mass index, parity, diabetes mellitus, maximal fetal weight at previous deliveries, actual birthweight, and labor induction (p = 0.014). EFW >= 3,800 g and diabetes mellitus were independent predictors of CD. Among women with EFW >= 3,800 g and diabetes mellitus, the risk of CD was double that of those without diabetes and with EFW >= 3,800 g (31.4% vs. 15.2%, p = 0.02), although their actual birthweights were similar. Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes were similar between those with sonographic EFW >= 3,800 and< 3,800 g. Conclusion Larger EFW increased CD risk among pregnancies with actual neonatal macrosomia. Antenatally suspectedmacrosomiamight alter labormanagement due to concerns for potential complications, especially when associated with primiparity, diabetes mellitus, or maternal obesity. The increase in the CD rate did not show an association with improved maternal and neonatal outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A COMPARISON OF SONOGRAPHIC ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHT AND OBSTETRICALLY DETERMINED GESTATIONAL-AGE IN THE PREDICTION OF NEONATAL OUTCOME FOR THE VERY LOW BIRTH-WEIGHT FETUS
    CHERVENAK, FA
    BERKOWITZ, GS
    THORNTON, J
    KREISS, C
    YOUCHA, S
    EHRENKRANZ, RA
    HOBBINS, JC
    BERKOWITZ, RL
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1985, 152 (01) : 47 - 50
  • [22] Statistical limits in sonographic estimation of birth weight
    Marco Scioscia
    Floriano Scioscia
    Gaetano Scioscia
    Stefano Bettocchi
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2015, 291 : 59 - 66
  • [23] Statistical limits in sonographic estimation of birth weight
    Scioscia, Marco
    Scioscia, Floriano
    Scioscia, Gaetano
    Bettocchi, Stefano
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2015, 291 (01) : 59 - 66
  • [24] Accuracy of Sonographic Fetal Weight Estimation in Bangladesh
    Rashid, Sabrina Q.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ULTRASOUND, 2015, 23 (02) : 82 - 85
  • [25] Fetal and neonatal complications of gestational diabetes perinatal mortality, congenital malformations, macrosomia, shoulder dystocia, birth injuries, neonatal outcomes
    Mitanchez, D.
    JOURNAL DE GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE ET BIOLOGIE DE LA REPRODUCTION, 2010, 39 (08): : S189 - S199
  • [26] SONOGRAPHIC ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHT IN DIABETIC PREGNANCY
    PEDERSEN, JF
    MOLSTEDPEDERSEN, L
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1992, 99 (06): : 475 - 478
  • [27] Impact of maternal BMI on the accuracy of third trimester sonographic estimation of fetal weight
    Martins, Juliana Gevaerd
    Kawakita, Tetsuya
    Jain, Priyanka
    Gurganus, Margot M.
    Baraki, Dana
    Barake, Carole
    Sinkovskaya, Elena
    Abuhamad, Alfred
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 226 (01) : S217 - S218
  • [28] SONOGRAPHIC ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHT BASED ON A MODEL OF FETAL VOLUME
    COMBS, CA
    JAEKLE, RK
    ROSENN, B
    POPE, M
    MIODOVNIK, M
    SIDDIQI, TA
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1993, 82 (03): : 365 - 370
  • [29] Fetal weight estimation and prediction of fetal macrosomia in non-diabetic pregnant women
    Öçer, F
    Kaleli, S
    Budak, E
    Oral, E
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1999, 83 (01): : 47 - 52
  • [30] Accuracy of sonographic weight estimation as a function of fetal sex
    Melamed, N.
    Ben-Haroush, A.
    Meizner, I.
    Mashiach, R.
    Glezerman, M.
    Yogev, Y.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 38 (01) : 67 - 73