Integrating life cycle sustainability assessment in power flow optimization

被引:1
|
作者
Hallste, Teresa [1 ]
Guerrero, Jose M. [2 ]
Reina, Pablo [1 ]
Conde, Eduardo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Madrid UPM, Dept Energia & Combustibles, ETS Ingn Minas & Energia, Calle Rios Rosas 21, Madrid 28003, Spain
[2] Univ Pais Vasco Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea UPV, Escuela Ingn Bilbao, Elect Engn Dept, Plaza Ingeniero Torres Quevedo 1, Bilbao 48013, Spain
来源
关键词
Electricity production; Energy transition; Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment; Multi-objective optimization; Optimal Power Flow; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.segan.2024.101412
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The electric power network management is an important field of improving to achieve sustainability. Optimal Power Flows (OPFs) allow the efficient operation of the system. However, OPF algorithms only consider the operation stage of the power plants involved in the power system, neglecting the rest of stages of its life cycle. To evaluate the total effects of the power generation mix, this work develops a methodology to perform a MultiObjective OPF (MOOPF) with impact variables in electrical systems that integrate different generation technologies. These variables result from the application of a Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA), consisting in environmental, economic, and social indexes with "cradle-to-grave" dimensions. To achieve this objective, the MOOPF is carried out operating a MATLAB algorithm over the IEEE57 bus system. It uses the epsilon-constraint method subject to the imposition of two or three impact variables. To examine the applications of this work, several simulations are performed optimizing different impact variables. Two different Spanish electricity scenarios are considered: the 2019 generation, and the 2030 objective generation proposed by the Spanish National Energy and Climate Plan. This tool broadens the scope of MOOPF assessment that can be used in a decision-making process. It allows to identify important environmental, economic, and social affections derived from system designs and limits. The study proves that the application of LCSA with MOOPF obtains realistic results making sustainability solutions technically viable. Additionally, different benefits and drawbacks, linked to the studied scenarios and grid disposition, are compared when conducting the proposed methodology for hourly generation management.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Life cycle assessment, electricity generation and sustainability
    Aumonier, S.
    Nuclear Energy, 1998, 37 (05): : 295 - 302
  • [32] The revised mathematics of life cycle sustainability assessment
    Heijungs, Reinout
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 350
  • [33] Mapping sustainability assessment with the project life cycle
    Thomson, Craig S.
    El-Haram, Mohamed A.
    Emmanuel, Rohinton
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-ENGINEERING SUSTAINABILITY, 2011, 164 (02) : 143 - 157
  • [34] Life cycle assessment, electricity generation and sustainability
    Aumonier, S
    NUCLEAR ENERGY-JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH NUCLEAR ENERGY SOCIETY, 1998, 37 (05): : 295 - 302
  • [35] Is there a place for culture in life cycle sustainability assessment?
    Stefania Pizzirani
    Sarah J. McLaren
    Jeffrey K. Seadon
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2014, 19 : 1316 - 1330
  • [36] Life cycle sustainability assessment and optimization of seismic retrofit solutions for RC frame structures
    Ahmed, Hafiz Asfandyar
    Wang, Zhenru
    Li, Yaohan
    CASE STUDIES IN CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, 2025, 22
  • [37] Is there a place for culture in life cycle sustainability assessment?
    Pizzirani, Stefania
    McLaren, Sarah J.
    Seadon, Jeffrey K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2014, 19 (06): : 1316 - 1330
  • [38] Life cycle sustainability assessment and optimization of seismic retrofit solutions for RC frame structures
    Ahmed, Hafiz Asfandyar
    Wang, Zhenru
    Li, Yaohan
    Case Studies in Construction Materials, 22
  • [39] Product sustainability assessment for product life cycle
    He, Bin
    Luo, Ting
    Huang, Shan
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 206 : 238 - 250
  • [40] The Use of Life Cycle Techniques in the Assessment of Sustainability
    Gundes, Selin
    URBAN PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT (UPADSD), 2016, 216 : 916 - 922