Integrating life cycle sustainability assessment in power flow optimization

被引:1
|
作者
Hallste, Teresa [1 ]
Guerrero, Jose M. [2 ]
Reina, Pablo [1 ]
Conde, Eduardo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Madrid UPM, Dept Energia & Combustibles, ETS Ingn Minas & Energia, Calle Rios Rosas 21, Madrid 28003, Spain
[2] Univ Pais Vasco Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea UPV, Escuela Ingn Bilbao, Elect Engn Dept, Plaza Ingeniero Torres Quevedo 1, Bilbao 48013, Spain
来源
关键词
Electricity production; Energy transition; Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment; Multi-objective optimization; Optimal Power Flow; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.segan.2024.101412
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The electric power network management is an important field of improving to achieve sustainability. Optimal Power Flows (OPFs) allow the efficient operation of the system. However, OPF algorithms only consider the operation stage of the power plants involved in the power system, neglecting the rest of stages of its life cycle. To evaluate the total effects of the power generation mix, this work develops a methodology to perform a MultiObjective OPF (MOOPF) with impact variables in electrical systems that integrate different generation technologies. These variables result from the application of a Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA), consisting in environmental, economic, and social indexes with "cradle-to-grave" dimensions. To achieve this objective, the MOOPF is carried out operating a MATLAB algorithm over the IEEE57 bus system. It uses the epsilon-constraint method subject to the imposition of two or three impact variables. To examine the applications of this work, several simulations are performed optimizing different impact variables. Two different Spanish electricity scenarios are considered: the 2019 generation, and the 2030 objective generation proposed by the Spanish National Energy and Climate Plan. This tool broadens the scope of MOOPF assessment that can be used in a decision-making process. It allows to identify important environmental, economic, and social affections derived from system designs and limits. The study proves that the application of LCSA with MOOPF obtains realistic results making sustainability solutions technically viable. Additionally, different benefits and drawbacks, linked to the studied scenarios and grid disposition, are compared when conducting the proposed methodology for hourly generation management.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Letter to the Editor - Life cycle sustainability assessment without a life cycle?
    Heijungs, Reinout
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2023, 195 (10)
  • [22] Integrating circularity into Life Cycle Assessment: Circularity with a life cycle perspective
    Palomero, Julia Cilleruelo
    Freboeuf, Louis
    Ciroth, Andreas
    Sonnemann, Guido
    CLEANER ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2024, 12
  • [23] From a critical review to a conceptual framework for integrating the criticality of resources into Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment
    Sonnemann, Guido
    Gemechu, Eskinder Demisse
    Adibi, Naeem
    De Bruille, Vincent
    Bulle, Cecile
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 94 : 20 - 34
  • [24] Integrating Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment Results Using Fuzzy-TOPSIS in Automotive Lightweighting
    Zanchi, Laura
    Delogu, Massimo
    Dattilo, Caterina Antonia
    Zamagni, Alessandra
    Del Pero, Francesco
    SAE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING, 2021, 14 (03) : 317 - 341
  • [25] Integrating sustainability assessment tools with life cycle analysis for agroecological systems: A UK case study
    Westaway, Sally
    Zylowski, Tomasz
    Hardiman, Sam
    Smith, Laurence G.
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2024, 219
  • [26] Life cycle assessment as part of sustainability assessment for chemicals
    Klöpffer, W
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2005, 12 (03) : 173 - 177
  • [27] Life cycle assessment for sustainability assessment of biofuels and bioproducts
    Gheewala, Shabbir H.
    BIOFUEL RESEARCH JOURNAL-BRJ, 2023, 10 (01): : 1810 - 1815
  • [28] Life cycle sustainability assessment of crops in India
    Selvaraj, Ambika
    Gautam, Jagrati
    Verma, Shikhar
    Verma, Gaurav
    Jain, Siddhant
    CURRENT RESEARCH IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 3
  • [29] Principles for the application of life cycle sustainability assessment
    Valdivia, Sonia
    Backes, Jana Gerta
    Traverso, Marzia
    Sonnemann, Guido
    Cucurachi, Stefano
    Guinee, Jeroen B.
    Schaubroeck, Thomas
    Finkbeiner, Matthias
    Leroy-Parmentier, Noemie
    Ugaya, Cassia
    Pena, Claudia
    Zamagni, Alessandra
    Inaba, Atsushi
    Amaral, Milena
    Berger, Markus
    Dvarioniene, Jolanta
    Vakhitova, Tatiana
    Benoit-Norris, Catherine
    Prox, Martina
    Foolmaun, Rajendra
    Goedkoop, Mark
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2021, 26 (09): : 1900 - 1905
  • [30] THE APPROACH OF LIFE CYCLE SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT OF BIOREFINERIES
    Jungmeier, G.
    Hingsamer, M.
    Steiner, D.
    Kaltenegger, I.
    Kleinegris, D.
    Van Ree, R.
    de Jong, E.
    PAPERS OF THE 24TH EUROPEAN BIOMASS CONFERENCE: SETTING THE COURSE FOR A BIOBASED ECONOMY, 2016, : 1660 - 1665