Boundary of ecosystem services: Differentiating between ecosystem services and geosystem services is needed

被引:1
|
作者
Chen, Haojie [1 ,2 ]
Sloggy, Matthew R. [2 ]
Escobedo, Francisco [2 ]
Koskimaki, Teemu [3 ]
Lu, Tianchu [4 ]
Meng, Ziqi [5 ]
Rasheed, A. Rifaee [6 ]
Sanchez, Jose J. [7 ]
Tan, Xin [7 ]
Yang, Weishan [8 ]
Yu, Fang
机构
[1] Oak Ridge Inst Sci & Educ, US Dept Energy, Riverside, CA 92507 USA
[2] Forest Serv USDA, Pacific Southwest Res Stn, Riverside, CA 92507 USA
[3] Univ Eastern Finland, Dept Social Sci, Kuopio 70210, Finland
[4] UCL, Inst Global Prosper, London WC1E 6BT, England
[5] Australian Natl Univ, Res Sch Biol, Plant Sci Div, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
[6] Deakin Univ, Fac Sci Engn & Built Environm, Ctr Integrat Ecol, Melbourne, VIC 3125, Australia
[7] Macquarie Univ, Sydney, NSW 2113, Australia
[8] Chinese Acad Environm Planning, Ctr Ecoenvironm Accounting, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
关键词
Keywords; Biodiversity; Conservation; Geodiversity; Nature's services; Resources; Typology; GEODIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121285
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Geosystem services (GSs) and ecosystem services (ESs) are interconnected, both representing nature's contributions to people. Whether GSs are a subset of ESs depends on the definition of ESs. The answer would be "not necessarily" (i.e., some GSs are, while other GSs are not), if ESs are the benefits humans derive from ecological functions, processes, or characteristics. The boundary proposed by Chen et al. (2023) to differentiate ESs from other ecosystem-related benefits adopted this definition, and suggested that ESs are renewable and affected by biotic elements to occur. Gray et al. (2024) criticized this boundary for separating out bits of nature and ignoring the contributions of GSs and abiotic elements to ESs and human wellbeing. In fact, highlighting that ESs are affected by biotic elements to occur does not deny that ESs' occurrence is also affected by abiotic elements. However, ESs' dependence on abiotic elements cannot be a criterion to differentiate ESs from other benefits because abiotic elements are integral to geosystems, ecosystems, and many other natural and artificial systems, as well as to these systems' services. Conversely, while geosystems might persist without biotic elements, ecosystems cannot. Chen et al. (2023) only excluded those (not the whole) abiotic benefits, such as wind energy, that may occur independently of biotic elements, while allowing for integrating certain GSs into ESs. For example, geological structures can offer flood protection and water storage as GSs, which can also be classified as ESs when their qualities or quantities are affected by biotic elements. Differentiation between GSs and ESs should not be misinterpreted as splitting their interconnections or undervaluing or dividing nature. Instead, such differentiation and classification of nature's benefits serve to facilitate communication, management, education, research, and policy-making associated with nature's benefits, while also highlighting the richness and diversity of nature's benefits.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An expanded framing of ecosystem services is needed for a sustainable urban future
    Elliot, T.
    Torres-Matallana, J. A.
    Goldstein, B.
    Almenar, J. Babi
    Baggethun, E. Gomez-
    Proenca, V.
    Rugani, B.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2022, 162
  • [42] Boundary of ecosystem services: Guiding future development and application of the ecosystem service concepts
    Chen, Haojie
    Sloggy, Matthew R.
    Dhiaulhaq, Ahmad
    Escobedo, Francisco J.
    Rasheed, A. Rifaee
    Sanchez, Jose J.
    Yang, Weishan
    Yu, Fang
    Meng, Ziqi
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 344
  • [43] The significance of geosystem and landscape concepts for the assessment of ecosystem services: exemplified in a case study in Russia
    Bastian, Olaf
    Grunewald, Karsten
    Khoroshev, Alexander V.
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2015, 30 (07) : 1145 - 1164
  • [44] What is the relationship between ecosystem services and farmers' livelihoods? Based on measuring the contribution of ecosystem services to farmers' livelihoods
    Zhou, Lilei
    Guan, Dongjie
    Sun, Lingli
    He, Xiujuan
    Chen, Maolin
    Zhang, Yongchuan
    Zhou, Lianjie
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2023, 11
  • [45] Relationship between landscape and river ecosystem services
    Dede, M.
    Sunardi, S.
    Lam, K. C.
    Withaningsih, S.
    GLOBAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT-GJESM, 2023, 9 (03): : 637 - 652
  • [46] Ecosystem services between integration and economics imperialism
    Thoren, Henrik
    Stalhammar, Sanna
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2018, 23 (04):
  • [47] The significance of geosystem and landscape concepts for the assessment of ecosystem services: exemplified in a case study in Russia
    Olaf Bastian
    Karsten Grunewald
    Alexander V. Khoroshev
    Landscape Ecology, 2015, 30 : 1145 - 1164
  • [48] A quantitative review of relationships between ecosystem services
    Lee, Heera
    Lautenbach, Sven
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 66 : 340 - 351
  • [49] Valuing ecosystem services and ecosystem assets for The Netherlands
    Schenau, Sjoerd
    van Berkel, Jocelyn
    Bogaart, Patrick
    Blom, Chantal
    Driessen, Corine
    de Jongh, Linda
    de Jong, Rixt
    Horlings, Edwin
    Mosterd, Redbad
    Hein, Lars
    Lof, Marjolein
    ONE ECOSYSTEM, 2022, 7
  • [50] Risk, reward, and payments for ecosystem services: A portfolio approach to ecosystem services and forestland investment
    Matthies, Brent D.
    Kalliokoski, Tuomo
    Ekholm, Tommi
    Hoen, Hans Fredrik
    Valsta, Lauri T.
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2015, 16 : 1 - 12