Boundary of ecosystem services: Differentiating between ecosystem services and geosystem services is needed

被引:1
|
作者
Chen, Haojie [1 ,2 ]
Sloggy, Matthew R. [2 ]
Escobedo, Francisco [2 ]
Koskimaki, Teemu [3 ]
Lu, Tianchu [4 ]
Meng, Ziqi [5 ]
Rasheed, A. Rifaee [6 ]
Sanchez, Jose J. [7 ]
Tan, Xin [7 ]
Yang, Weishan [8 ]
Yu, Fang
机构
[1] Oak Ridge Inst Sci & Educ, US Dept Energy, Riverside, CA 92507 USA
[2] Forest Serv USDA, Pacific Southwest Res Stn, Riverside, CA 92507 USA
[3] Univ Eastern Finland, Dept Social Sci, Kuopio 70210, Finland
[4] UCL, Inst Global Prosper, London WC1E 6BT, England
[5] Australian Natl Univ, Res Sch Biol, Plant Sci Div, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
[6] Deakin Univ, Fac Sci Engn & Built Environm, Ctr Integrat Ecol, Melbourne, VIC 3125, Australia
[7] Macquarie Univ, Sydney, NSW 2113, Australia
[8] Chinese Acad Environm Planning, Ctr Ecoenvironm Accounting, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
关键词
Keywords; Biodiversity; Conservation; Geodiversity; Nature's services; Resources; Typology; GEODIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121285
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Geosystem services (GSs) and ecosystem services (ESs) are interconnected, both representing nature's contributions to people. Whether GSs are a subset of ESs depends on the definition of ESs. The answer would be "not necessarily" (i.e., some GSs are, while other GSs are not), if ESs are the benefits humans derive from ecological functions, processes, or characteristics. The boundary proposed by Chen et al. (2023) to differentiate ESs from other ecosystem-related benefits adopted this definition, and suggested that ESs are renewable and affected by biotic elements to occur. Gray et al. (2024) criticized this boundary for separating out bits of nature and ignoring the contributions of GSs and abiotic elements to ESs and human wellbeing. In fact, highlighting that ESs are affected by biotic elements to occur does not deny that ESs' occurrence is also affected by abiotic elements. However, ESs' dependence on abiotic elements cannot be a criterion to differentiate ESs from other benefits because abiotic elements are integral to geosystems, ecosystems, and many other natural and artificial systems, as well as to these systems' services. Conversely, while geosystems might persist without biotic elements, ecosystems cannot. Chen et al. (2023) only excluded those (not the whole) abiotic benefits, such as wind energy, that may occur independently of biotic elements, while allowing for integrating certain GSs into ESs. For example, geological structures can offer flood protection and water storage as GSs, which can also be classified as ESs when their qualities or quantities are affected by biotic elements. Differentiation between GSs and ESs should not be misinterpreted as splitting their interconnections or undervaluing or dividing nature. Instead, such differentiation and classification of nature's benefits serve to facilitate communication, management, education, research, and policy-making associated with nature's benefits, while also highlighting the richness and diversity of nature's benefits.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] High plant diversity is needed to maintain ecosystem services
    Forest Isbell
    Vincent Calcagno
    Andy Hector
    John Connolly
    W. Stanley Harpole
    Peter B. Reich
    Michael Scherer-Lorenzen
    Bernhard Schmid
    David Tilman
    Jasper van Ruijven
    Alexandra Weigelt
    Brian J. Wilsey
    Erika S. Zavaleta
    Michel Loreau
    Nature, 2011, 477 : 199 - 202
  • [12] Ecosystem Services as Boundary Objects for Transdisciplinary Collaboration
    Steger, Cara
    Hirsch, Shana
    Evers, Cody
    Branoff, Benjamin
    Petrova, Maria
    Nielsen-Pincus, Max
    Wardropper, Chloe
    van Riper, Carena J.
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 143 : 153 - 160
  • [13] Payments for ecosystem services as an essential approach to improving ecosystem services: A review
    Yan, Haiming
    Yang, Huicai
    Guo, Xiaonan
    Zhao, Shuqin
    Jiang, Qun'ou
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 201
  • [14] Ecosystem Services: A Systematic Review of Provisioning and Cultural Ecosystem Services in Estuaries
    Booi, Sipesihle
    Mishi, Syden
    Andersen, Oddgeir
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (12)
  • [15] Using dialogue to contextualize culture, ecosystem services, and cultural ecosystem services
    Allen, Karen E.
    Castellano, Celia
    Pessagno, Sophia
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2021, 26 (02):
  • [16] Linking ecosystem processes and ecosystem services
    Fu, Bojie
    Wang, Shuai
    Su, Changhong
    Forsius, Martin
    CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2013, 5 (01) : 4 - 10
  • [17] A critical interrogation of the relation between the ecosystem approach and ecosystem services
    De Lucia, Vito
    REVIEW OF EUROPEAN COMPARATIVE & INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW, 2018, 27 (02) : 104 - 114
  • [18] Ecosystem services for sale
    不详
    NEW SCIENTIST, 2008, 198 (2650) : 5 - 5
  • [19] Ecosystem Services for 2020
    Perrings, C.
    Naeem, S.
    Ahrestani, F.
    Bunker, D. E.
    Burkill, P.
    Canziani, G.
    Elmqvist, T.
    Ferrati, R.
    Fuhrman, J. A.
    Jaksic, F.
    Kawabata, Z.
    Kinzig, A.
    Mace, G. M.
    Milano, F.
    Mooney, H.
    Prieur-Richard, A. -H.
    Tschirhart, J.
    Weisser, W.
    SCIENCE, 2010, 330 (6002) : 323 - 324
  • [20] Fishing for ecosystem services
    Pope, Kevin L.
    Pegg, Mark A.
    Cole, Nicholas W.
    Siddons, Stephen F.
    Fedele, Alexis D.
    Harmon, Brian S.
    Ruskamp, Ryan L.
    Turner, Dylan R.
    Uerling, Caleb C.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 183 : 408 - 417