Predicting environmental impacts of smallholder wheat production by coupling life cycle assessment and machine learning

被引:1
|
作者
Yu, Chunxiao [1 ]
Xu, Gang [1 ,3 ]
Cai, Ming [2 ]
Li, Yuan [1 ]
Wang, Lijia [1 ]
Zhang, Yan [1 ]
Lin, Huilong [1 ]
机构
[1] Lanzhou Univ, Coll Pastoral Agr Sci & Technol, Engn Res Ctr Grassland Ind, Minist Educ,State Key Lab Herbage Improvement & Gr, Lanzhou 730020, Peoples R China
[2] Yunnan Acad Grassland & Anim Sci, Kunming 650212, Peoples R China
[3] Lanzhou Univ, Coll Pastoral Agr Sci & Technol, Lanzhou 730020, Gansu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Smallholder; Policy making; Climate change; Farming practice; Machine learning; Life cycle assessment; Wheat; NONPOINT-SOURCE POLLUTION; LAND FRAGMENTATION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; AIR-POLLUTION; CHINA; FARMERS; ADAPTATION; PM2.5; PARTICIPATION; LIVELIHOODS;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171097
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Wheat grain production is a vital component of the food supply produced by smallholder farms but faces significant threats from climate change. This study evaluated eight environmental impacts of wheat production using life cycle assessment based on survey data from 274 households, then built random forest models with 21 input features to contrast the environmental responses of different farming practices across three shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs), spanning from 2024 to 2100. The results indicate significant environmental repercussions. Compared to the baseline period of 2018-2020, a similar upward trend in environmental impacts is observed, showing an average annual growth rate of 5.88 % (ranging from 0.45 to 18.56 %) under the sustainable pathway (SSP119) scenario; 5.90 % (ranging from 1.00 to 18.15 %) for the intermediate development pathway (SSP245); and 6.22 % (ranging from 1.16 to 17.74 %) under the rapid economic development pathway (SSP585). Variation in rainfall is identified as the primary driving factor of the increased environmental impacts, whereas its relationship with rising temperatures is not significant. The results suggest adopting farming practices as a vital strategy for smallholder farms to mitigate climate change impacts. Emphasizing appropriate fertilizer application and straw recycling can significantly reduce the environmental footprint of wheat production. Standardized fertilization could reduce the environmental impact index by 11.10 to 47.83 %, while straw recycling might decrease respiratory inorganics and photochemical oxidant formation potential by over 40 %. Combined, these approaches could lower the impact index by 12.31 to 63.38 %. The findings highlight the importance of adopting enhanced farming practices within smallholder farming systems in the context of climate change. Spotlights: center dot China's smallholder wheat farming is increasingly exposed to climate threats, risking resource depletion and pollution center dot Increasing eco-impacts of smallholder wheat farming could be mitigated by regulated fertilizer use and straw recycling center dot Life cycle assessment combined with machine learning targets future environmental impacts in dynamic climate scenarios center dot The study offers actionable policy advice for sustainable smallholder wheat farming practices center dot Future work may probe machine learning's role in forecasting smallholder production behaviors and farming decision aid
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life cycle assessment to compare the environmental impacts of different wheat production systems
    Taki, Morteza
    Soheili-Fard, Farshad
    Rohani, Abbas
    Chen, Guangnan
    Yildizhan, Hasan
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 197 : 195 - 207
  • [2] Environmental impacts of wheat-based vodka production using life cycle assessment
    Bhattacharyya, Nirvan
    Goodell, Amy
    Rogers, Sarah
    Demond, Avery
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 231 : 642 - 648
  • [3] Improved Machine Learning Models by Data Processing for Predicting Life-Cycle Environmental Impacts of Chemicals
    You, Shijie
    Sun, Ye
    Wang, Xiuheng
    Ren, Nanqi
    Liu, Yanbiao
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 57 (08) : 3434 - 3444
  • [4] Predicting product life cycle environmental impacts with machine learning: Uncertainties and implications for future reporting requirements
    Baehr, Julian
    Koyamparambath, Anish
    Dos Reis, Eduardo
    Weyand, Steffi
    Binnig, Carsten
    Schebek, Liselotte
    Sonnemann, Guido
    Sustainable Production and Consumption, 2024, 52 : 511 - 526
  • [5] Environmental life cycle assessment and social impacts of bioethanol production in Thailand
    Papong, Seksan
    Rewlay-ngoen, Chantima
    Itsubo, Norihiro
    Malakul, Pomthong
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 157 : 254 - 266
  • [6] Environmental life cycle assessment of bioethanol production from wheat straw
    Borrion, Aiduan Li
    McManus, Marcelle C.
    Hammond, Geoffrey P.
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2012, 47 : 9 - 19
  • [7] Predicting the environmental impacts of chicken systems in the United Kingdom through a life cycle assessment: Broiler production systems
    Leinonen, I.
    Williams, A. G.
    Wiseman, J.
    Guy, J.
    Kyriazakis, I.
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2012, 91 (01) : 8 - 25
  • [8] Predicting the environmental impacts of chicken systems in the United Kingdom through a life cycle assessment: Egg production systems
    Leinonen, I.
    Williams, A. G.
    Wiseman, J.
    Guy, J.
    Kyriazakis, I.
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2012, 91 (01) : 26 - 40
  • [9] Application of life cycle assessment and machine learning for the production and environmental sustainability assessment of hydrothermal bio-oil
    Guo, Genmao
    He, Yuan
    Jin, Fangming
    Masek, Ondrej
    Huang, Qing
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 379
  • [10] Evaluating environmental impacts with life cycle assessment
    Pacanot, Vince Davidson J.
    NATURE REVIEWS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 3 (04) : 224 - 224