Assessing the carbon footprint of the agriculture, forestry, and fishing industry of Australia

被引:0
|
作者
Kazemian, Soheil [1 ]
Zaman, Rashid [1 ]
Iranmanesh, Mohammad [2 ]
Sanusi, Zuraidah Mohd [3 ]
机构
[1] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Business & Law, Joondalup Campus, Joondalup, Australia
[2] La Trobe Univ, La Trobe Business Sch, Bundoora Campus, Melbourne, Australia
[3] Univ Teknol MARA, Accounting Res Inst, Shah Alam, Malaysia
关键词
Carbon footprint calculation; Agriculture; Forestry and fishing industry; Australia; Input-output; Lifecycle assessment; IELab; WASTE MANAGEMENT; EMISSIONS; ELECTRICITY; MITIGATION; LIVESTOCK; PRODUCTS; ENERGY; IMPACT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1108/SAMPJ-08-2023-0610
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
PurposeThis study examines the carbon emissions of Australia's agriculture, forestry and fishing sectors from a consumption perspective to develop effective policy frameworks. The objective is to identify key supply chains, industries and products contributing to these emissions and provide recommendations for sustainable development.Design/methodology/approachA multiregional input-output lifecycle assessment was conducted using the Australian Industrial Ecology Virtual Laboratory (IELab) platform to disaggregate sectors and enable benchmarking against other economic sectors.FindingsIn 2018, the "agriculture, forestry, and fishing" sector was responsible for 12.15% of Australia's carbon footprint. Major contributors included the "electricity, gas, water, and waste" category (26.1%) and the sector's activities (24.3%). The "transport, postal, and warehousing" sector also contributed 18.4%. Within the industry, the agriculture subsector had the highest impact (71.3%), followed by forestry and logging (15%) and fishing, hunting and trapping (7.6%). Aquaculture and supporting services contributed 6.1%.Research limitations/implicationsThe principal constraint encountered by the present study pertained to the availability of up-to-date data. The latest accessible data for quantifying the carbon footprint within Australia's agriculture, forestry and fishing sector, utilizing the Input-Output analysis methodology through the Australian Industrial Ecology Virtual Laboratory (IELab) platform, about 2018.Practical implicationsThe findings of this study provide policymakers with detailed insights into the carbon footprints of key sectors, highlighting the contributions from each subsector. This information can be directly used to develop effective emission-reduction policies, with a focus on reducing emissions in utility services, transport and warehousing.Social implicationsThe study, by raising public awareness of the significant role of industrial agricultural methods in Australia's carbon footprint and emphasizing the importance of renewable energy and sustainable fuels for electricity generation and road transport, underscores the urgent need for action to mitigate climate change.Originality/valueThis study stands out by not only identifying the most impactful industries but also by providing specific strategies to reduce their emissions. It offers a comprehensive breakdown of specific agricultural activities and outlines mitigation strategies for utility services, agricultural operations and transport, thereby adding a unique perspective to the existing knowledge.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The carbon footprint of hospital diagnostic imaging in Australia
    McAlister, Scott
    McGain, Forbes
    Petersen, Matilde
    Story, David
    Charlesworth, Kate
    Ison, Glenn
    Barratt, Alexandra
    LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH-WESTERN PACIFIC, 2022, 24
  • [42] Carbon footprint scenarios for renewable electricity in Australia
    Wolfram, Paul
    Wiedmann, Thomas
    Diesendorf, Mark
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 124 : 236 - 245
  • [43] The carbon footprint of Australia's construction sector
    Yu, Man
    Wiedmann, Thomas
    Crawford, Robert
    Tait, Catriona
    INTERNATIONAL HIGH-PERFORMANCE BUILT ENVIRONMENT CONFERENCE - A SUSTAINABLE BUILT ENVIRONMENT CONFERENCE 2016 SERIES (SBE16), IHBE 2016, 2017, 180 : 211 - 220
  • [44] Carbon Footprint of Brazilian Agriculture Based on Field Operations
    Veiga, Joao P. S.
    Popin, Gustavo V.
    Cerri, Carlos E. P.
    Romanelli, Thiago L.
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2024, 14 (07):
  • [45] PLANNING RURAL LAND-DEVELOPMENT - FORESTRY AND AGRICULTURE IN NORTHEASTERN AUSTRALIA
    MCDONALD, GT
    AUSTRALIAN GEOGRAPHICAL STUDIES, 1984, 22 (01): : 100 - 121
  • [46] Assessing the Carbon Footprint of Civil Aircraft Engines
    Ogorodnikov S.S.
    Gusiletov A.A.
    Verkhovskaya E.A.
    Kataev A.A.
    Sokuler M.S.
    Russian Engineering Research, 2023, 43 (05) : 631 - 632
  • [47] Assessing the Carbon Footprint of Telemedicine: A Systematic Review
    van der Zee, Casper
    Chang-Wolf, Jennifer
    Koopmanschap, Marc A.
    van Leeuwen, Redmer
    Wisse, Robert P. L.
    HEALTH SERVICES INSIGHTS, 2024, 17
  • [48] Study on Carbon Footprint of Rice Industry in China
    Pan Weiguang
    Wang Zilu
    Cheng Hsiangtai
    LOW-CARBON MODEL WHEN PURSUIT OF URBANIZATION IN CHINA, 2011, : 177 - +
  • [49] Calculation and estimation of the carbon footprint of paint industry
    Saif, Samia
    Feroz, Anum
    Asif Khan, M.
    Akhtar, Sana
    Mehmood, Asim
    Nature Environment and Pollution Technology, 2015, 14 (03) : 633 - 638
  • [50] The plastics industry will confront its carbon footprint
    Scott, Alex
    CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 2022, 100 (02) : 30 - 30