Assessing the carbon footprint of the agriculture, forestry, and fishing industry of Australia

被引:0
|
作者
Kazemian, Soheil [1 ]
Zaman, Rashid [1 ]
Iranmanesh, Mohammad [2 ]
Sanusi, Zuraidah Mohd [3 ]
机构
[1] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Business & Law, Joondalup Campus, Joondalup, Australia
[2] La Trobe Univ, La Trobe Business Sch, Bundoora Campus, Melbourne, Australia
[3] Univ Teknol MARA, Accounting Res Inst, Shah Alam, Malaysia
关键词
Carbon footprint calculation; Agriculture; Forestry and fishing industry; Australia; Input-output; Lifecycle assessment; IELab; WASTE MANAGEMENT; EMISSIONS; ELECTRICITY; MITIGATION; LIVESTOCK; PRODUCTS; ENERGY; IMPACT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1108/SAMPJ-08-2023-0610
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
PurposeThis study examines the carbon emissions of Australia's agriculture, forestry and fishing sectors from a consumption perspective to develop effective policy frameworks. The objective is to identify key supply chains, industries and products contributing to these emissions and provide recommendations for sustainable development.Design/methodology/approachA multiregional input-output lifecycle assessment was conducted using the Australian Industrial Ecology Virtual Laboratory (IELab) platform to disaggregate sectors and enable benchmarking against other economic sectors.FindingsIn 2018, the "agriculture, forestry, and fishing" sector was responsible for 12.15% of Australia's carbon footprint. Major contributors included the "electricity, gas, water, and waste" category (26.1%) and the sector's activities (24.3%). The "transport, postal, and warehousing" sector also contributed 18.4%. Within the industry, the agriculture subsector had the highest impact (71.3%), followed by forestry and logging (15%) and fishing, hunting and trapping (7.6%). Aquaculture and supporting services contributed 6.1%.Research limitations/implicationsThe principal constraint encountered by the present study pertained to the availability of up-to-date data. The latest accessible data for quantifying the carbon footprint within Australia's agriculture, forestry and fishing sector, utilizing the Input-Output analysis methodology through the Australian Industrial Ecology Virtual Laboratory (IELab) platform, about 2018.Practical implicationsThe findings of this study provide policymakers with detailed insights into the carbon footprints of key sectors, highlighting the contributions from each subsector. This information can be directly used to develop effective emission-reduction policies, with a focus on reducing emissions in utility services, transport and warehousing.Social implicationsThe study, by raising public awareness of the significant role of industrial agricultural methods in Australia's carbon footprint and emphasizing the importance of renewable energy and sustainable fuels for electricity generation and road transport, underscores the urgent need for action to mitigate climate change.Originality/valueThis study stands out by not only identifying the most impactful industries but also by providing specific strategies to reduce their emissions. It offers a comprehensive breakdown of specific agricultural activities and outlines mitigation strategies for utility services, agricultural operations and transport, thereby adding a unique perspective to the existing knowledge.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessing the carbon footprint of water production
    Strutt, Justin
    Wilson, Sian
    Shorney-Darby, Holly
    Shaw, Andrew
    Byers, Andrew
    Journal / American Water Works Association, 2008, 100 (06): : 80 - 91
  • [32] Correction to: A Net Energy Analysis of the Global Agriculture, Aquaculture, Fishing and Forestry System
    Zeke Marshall
    Paul E. Brockway
    Biophysical Economics and Sustainability, 2020, 5 (2)
  • [33] Assessing the urban carbon footprint: An overview
    Lombardi, Mariarosaria
    Laiola, Elisabetta
    Tricase, Caterina
    Rana, Roberto
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2017, 66 : 43 - 52
  • [34] Assessing the carbon footprint of water production
    Strutt, Justin
    Wilson, Slan
    Shorney-Darby, Holly
    Shaw, Andrew
    Byers, Andrew
    JOURNAL AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION, 2008, 100 (06): : 80 - +
  • [35] Activated carbon as a byproduct of the forestry industry
    Tancredi, N
    Cordero, T
    Jiménez, JJR
    INGENIERIA QUIMICA, 1999, (15): : 28 - 32
  • [36] Silk industry and carbon footprint mitigation
    Giacomin, A. M.
    Garcia, J. B., Jr.
    Zonatti, W. F.
    Silva-Santos, M. C.
    Laktim, M. C.
    Baruque-Ramos, J.
    17TH WORLD TEXTILE CONFERENCE AUTEX 2017 - SHAPING THE FUTURE OF TEXTILES, 2017, 254
  • [37] WEBINAR "CARBON FOOTPRINT IN THE CHEMICAL INDUSTRY"
    Polaczek, Jerzy
    PRZEMYSL CHEMICZNY, 2024, 103 (04): : 458 - 459
  • [39] Updating the carbon footprint of the Galician fishing activity (NW Spain)
    Iribarren, Diego
    Vazquez-Rowe, Ian
    Hospido, Almudena
    Teresa Moreira, Maria
    Feijoo, Gumersindo
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 409 (08) : 1609 - 1611
  • [40] Estimation of the carbon footprint of the Galician fishing activity (NW Spain)
    Iribarren, Diego
    Vazquez-Rowe, Ian
    Hospido, Almudena
    Teresa Moreira, Maria
    Feijoo, Gumersindo
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 408 (22) : 5284 - 5294