Assessing the carbon footprint of the agriculture, forestry, and fishing industry of Australia

被引:0
|
作者
Kazemian, Soheil [1 ]
Zaman, Rashid [1 ]
Iranmanesh, Mohammad [2 ]
Sanusi, Zuraidah Mohd [3 ]
机构
[1] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Business & Law, Joondalup Campus, Joondalup, Australia
[2] La Trobe Univ, La Trobe Business Sch, Bundoora Campus, Melbourne, Australia
[3] Univ Teknol MARA, Accounting Res Inst, Shah Alam, Malaysia
关键词
Carbon footprint calculation; Agriculture; Forestry and fishing industry; Australia; Input-output; Lifecycle assessment; IELab; WASTE MANAGEMENT; EMISSIONS; ELECTRICITY; MITIGATION; LIVESTOCK; PRODUCTS; ENERGY; IMPACT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1108/SAMPJ-08-2023-0610
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
PurposeThis study examines the carbon emissions of Australia's agriculture, forestry and fishing sectors from a consumption perspective to develop effective policy frameworks. The objective is to identify key supply chains, industries and products contributing to these emissions and provide recommendations for sustainable development.Design/methodology/approachA multiregional input-output lifecycle assessment was conducted using the Australian Industrial Ecology Virtual Laboratory (IELab) platform to disaggregate sectors and enable benchmarking against other economic sectors.FindingsIn 2018, the "agriculture, forestry, and fishing" sector was responsible for 12.15% of Australia's carbon footprint. Major contributors included the "electricity, gas, water, and waste" category (26.1%) and the sector's activities (24.3%). The "transport, postal, and warehousing" sector also contributed 18.4%. Within the industry, the agriculture subsector had the highest impact (71.3%), followed by forestry and logging (15%) and fishing, hunting and trapping (7.6%). Aquaculture and supporting services contributed 6.1%.Research limitations/implicationsThe principal constraint encountered by the present study pertained to the availability of up-to-date data. The latest accessible data for quantifying the carbon footprint within Australia's agriculture, forestry and fishing sector, utilizing the Input-Output analysis methodology through the Australian Industrial Ecology Virtual Laboratory (IELab) platform, about 2018.Practical implicationsThe findings of this study provide policymakers with detailed insights into the carbon footprints of key sectors, highlighting the contributions from each subsector. This information can be directly used to develop effective emission-reduction policies, with a focus on reducing emissions in utility services, transport and warehousing.Social implicationsThe study, by raising public awareness of the significant role of industrial agricultural methods in Australia's carbon footprint and emphasizing the importance of renewable energy and sustainable fuels for electricity generation and road transport, underscores the urgent need for action to mitigate climate change.Originality/valueThis study stands out by not only identifying the most impactful industries but also by providing specific strategies to reduce their emissions. It offers a comprehensive breakdown of specific agricultural activities and outlines mitigation strategies for utility services, agricultural operations and transport, thereby adding a unique perspective to the existing knowledge.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] QUEENSLAND AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHING WORK HEALTH AND SAFETY PROSECUTIONS: REPERCUSSIONS
    King, Jemma C.
    Franklin, Richard C.
    McBain-Rigg, Kristin E.
    Leggal, Peter A.
    INJURY PREVENTION, 2021, 27 : A72 - A72
  • [22] Tax burden and interest burden on business in the agriculture, fishing and forestry sector
    Sedlacek, Jaroslav
    EUROPEAN FINANCIAL SYSTEMS 2017: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 14TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE, PT 2, 2017, : 256 - 265
  • [23] CARBON FOOTPRINT AND THE DAIRY INDUSTRY
    Chase, L. E.
    2014 CORNELL NUTRITION CONFERENCE FOR FEED MANUFACTURERS, PROCEEDINGS, 2014, : 148 - 154
  • [24] Examining the environmental tax and the fishing grounds footprint nexus: Case of the African fishing industry
    Wirajing, Muhamadu Awal Kindzeka
    Nanfosso, Roger Tsafack
    Kountchou, Armand Mboutchouang
    NATURAL RESOURCES FORUM, 2024,
  • [25] Food miles, carbon footprint and global value chains for Spanish agriculture: assessing the impact of a carbon border tax
    Lopez, Luis-Antonio
    Cadarso, Maria-Angeles
    Gomez, Nuria
    Tobarra, Maria-Angeles
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 103 : 423 - 436
  • [26] Methodology for Carbon Footprint in Forestry Findings and Ways of Improvement
    Chauvet, Gabriel
    Paris, Jean-Luc
    Devise, Olivier
    Charles, Andre
    COLLABORATIVE NETWORKS FOR A SUSTAINABLE WORLD, 2010, 336 : 125 - +
  • [27] The Carbon Footprint of Peritoneal Dialysis in Australia
    McAlister, Scott
    Talbot, Ben
    Knight, John
    Blair, Susan
    McGain, Forbes
    McDonald, Stephen
    Nelson, Craig
    Knight, Richard
    Barraclough, Katherine A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2024, 35 (08): : 1095 - 1103
  • [28] Agriculture-specific determinants of carbon footprint
    Balogh, Jeremias Mate
    STUDIES IN AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 121 (03): : 166 - 170
  • [29] Understanding Stakeholder Dissemination Preferences for an Agriculture, Forestry, and Fishing Injury Surveillance System
    Hansen-Ruiz, Cristina S.
    Luschen, Kevin
    Huber, John
    Scott, Erika
    JOURNAL OF AGROMEDICINE, 2024, 29 (02) : 235 - 245
  • [30] Working hours, sleep, and fatigue in the agriculture, forestry, and fishing sector: A scoping review
    Elliott, K. C.
    Lincoln, Jennifer M.
    Flynn, Michael A.
    Levin, Jeffrey L.
    Smidt, Mathew
    Dzugan, Jerry
    Ramos, Athena K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE, 2022, 65 (11) : 898 - 912