Enhancing Survival in Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Plasma Exchange Therapy

被引:0
|
作者
Hernandez, Grethel N. [1 ,2 ]
Francis, Aida J. [3 ]
Hamid, Pousette [4 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Infect Dis, Shreveport, LA 71105 USA
[2] Calif Inst Behav Neurosci & Psychol, Internal Med, Fairfield, CA 94534 USA
[3] Calif Inst Behav Neurosci & Psychol, Family Med, Fairfield, CA USA
[4] Calif Inst Behav Neurosci & Psychol, Neurol, Fairfield, CA USA
关键词
mortality reduction; septic shock; therapeutic plasma exchange (tpe); plasma exchange therapy; plasmapheresis;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.60947
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Sepsis is a life-threatening condition that occurs when the body's immune response to infection becomes unregulated, causing organ dysfunction and a heightened risk of mortality. Despite increased awareness campaigns, its prevalence escalates, annually afflicting over 1.7 million adults in the United States. This research explores the potential of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) in septic shock management, aiming to highlight its capacity to improve patient outcomes and reduce mortality. Adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, our comprehensive search across 51,534 studies, using keywords such as plasmapheresis, plasma exchange therapy, therapeutic plasma exchange, septic shock, and reduction in mortality integrated with medical subject headings terms, led to the meticulous selection of six pivotal studies. Through rigorous evaluation with tools such as the revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and Assessment of Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews, we extracted strong evidence supporting TPE's significant impact on decreasing mortality in septic shock patients compared to standard care, as demonstrated in three randomized controlled trials and one cohort study, with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.43 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.260.72). Additionally, two meta-analyses further validate TPE's effectiveness, showing a mortality reduction with an OR of 0.30 (95% CI = 0.20-0.46). This advantage also extends to critically ill COVID-19 patients, underscoring TPE's crucial role in modulating the coagulation cascade, decreasing sepsis-related complications, and reducing the risk of bleeding and organ failure. Nevertheless, the benefits of TPE must be carefully balanced against potential risks such as hypocalcemia, hypotension, and citrate toxicity, especially in patients with underlying renal or liver issues, emphasizing the importance of shared decision-making. While TPE emerges as a promising therapy, its formal integration into standard care protocols awaits further confirmation, highlighting the critical need for more in-depth research to conclusively determine its efficacy and safety in septic shock management.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Methylene blue in sepsis and septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ballarin, Raquel Simoes
    Lazzarin, Taline
    Zornoff, Leonardo
    Azevedo, Paula Schmidt
    Pereira, Filipe Welson Leal
    Tanni, Suzana Erico
    Minicucci, Marcos Ferreira
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 11
  • [22] Global epidemiology of septic shock: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tianyi, Frank Leonel
    Tochie, Joel Noutakdie
    Danwang, Celestin
    Mbonda, Aime
    Temgoua, Mazou N.
    Mapoh, Sylvester Yari
    Nkemngu, Njinkeng J.
    Tallah, Esther
    Bigna, Jean Joel
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (11):
  • [23] Terlipressin Versus Norepinephrine for Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Huang, Po
    Guo, Yuhong
    Li, Bo
    Liu, Qingquan
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 10
  • [24] Terlipressin for the treatment of septic shock in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Huang, Lili
    Zhang, Shi
    Chang, Wei
    Xia, Feiping
    Liu, Songqiao
    Yang, Yi
    Qiu, Haibo
    [J]. BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [25] Terlipressin for the treatment of septic shock in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lili Huang
    Shi Zhang
    Wei Chang
    Feiping Xia
    Songqiao Liu
    Yi Yang
    Haibo Qiu
    [J]. BMC Anesthesiology, 20
  • [26] Efficacy and safety of Shenfu injection for septic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Huang, Po
    Guo, Yuhong
    Feng, Shuo
    Zhao, Guozhen
    Li, Bo
    Liu, Qingquan
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 37 (12): : 2197 - 2204
  • [27] Comparative efficacy of Chinese herbal injections for septic shock A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Huang, Peiying
    Chen, Yan
    Liu, Qiang
    Lei, Sisi
    Feng, Yuchao
    Wu, Qihua
    Zhang, Haobo
    Chen, Bojun
    Zeng, Zhongyi
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (05) : E28183
  • [28] Evaluation of efficacy and safety of esmolol in treating patients with septic shock A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hou, Bin
    Cai, Ke
    Li, Yue
    Hu, Chunfang
    Pu, Xuehua
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (13) : E29124
  • [29] Clinical efficacy and safety of vitamin C in the treatment of septic shock patients: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cai, Bingbing
    Lv, Xue
    Lin, Ming
    Feng, Changfu
    Chen, Changneng
    [J]. ANNALS OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (04) : 1369 - 1380
  • [30] Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Lateral Epicondylitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yao, Gaowen
    Chen, Jing
    Duan, Yanji
    Chen, Xiao
    [J]. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 2020