Enhancing Survival in Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Plasma Exchange Therapy

被引:0
|
作者
Hernandez, Grethel N. [1 ,2 ]
Francis, Aida J. [3 ]
Hamid, Pousette [4 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Infect Dis, Shreveport, LA 71105 USA
[2] Calif Inst Behav Neurosci & Psychol, Internal Med, Fairfield, CA 94534 USA
[3] Calif Inst Behav Neurosci & Psychol, Family Med, Fairfield, CA USA
[4] Calif Inst Behav Neurosci & Psychol, Neurol, Fairfield, CA USA
关键词
mortality reduction; septic shock; therapeutic plasma exchange (tpe); plasma exchange therapy; plasmapheresis;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.60947
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Sepsis is a life-threatening condition that occurs when the body's immune response to infection becomes unregulated, causing organ dysfunction and a heightened risk of mortality. Despite increased awareness campaigns, its prevalence escalates, annually afflicting over 1.7 million adults in the United States. This research explores the potential of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) in septic shock management, aiming to highlight its capacity to improve patient outcomes and reduce mortality. Adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, our comprehensive search across 51,534 studies, using keywords such as plasmapheresis, plasma exchange therapy, therapeutic plasma exchange, septic shock, and reduction in mortality integrated with medical subject headings terms, led to the meticulous selection of six pivotal studies. Through rigorous evaluation with tools such as the revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and Assessment of Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews, we extracted strong evidence supporting TPE's significant impact on decreasing mortality in septic shock patients compared to standard care, as demonstrated in three randomized controlled trials and one cohort study, with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.43 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.260.72). Additionally, two meta-analyses further validate TPE's effectiveness, showing a mortality reduction with an OR of 0.30 (95% CI = 0.20-0.46). This advantage also extends to critically ill COVID-19 patients, underscoring TPE's crucial role in modulating the coagulation cascade, decreasing sepsis-related complications, and reducing the risk of bleeding and organ failure. Nevertheless, the benefits of TPE must be carefully balanced against potential risks such as hypocalcemia, hypotension, and citrate toxicity, especially in patients with underlying renal or liver issues, emphasizing the importance of shared decision-making. While TPE emerges as a promising therapy, its formal integration into standard care protocols awaits further confirmation, highlighting the critical need for more in-depth research to conclusively determine its efficacy and safety in septic shock management.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Efficacy of Metacognitive Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Normann, Nicoline
    Morina, Nexhmedin
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [32] Vitamin C therapy for patients with sepsis or septic shock: a protocol for a systematic review and a network meta-analysis
    Fujii, Tomoko
    Belletti, Alessandro
    Carr, Anitra
    Furukawa, Toshi A.
    Luethi, Nora
    Putzu, Alessandro
    Sartini, Chiara
    Salanti, Georgia
    Tsujimoto, Yasushi
    Udy, Andrew A.
    Young, Paul J.
    Bellomo, Rinaldo
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (11):
  • [33] An inquiry into the treatment of sepsis using plasma exchange therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Lei
    Zhao, Xin-Yu
    Guo, Shu-Yan
    Jiang, Jian
    Wang, Guan
    Weng, Yi-Bing
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL, 2023, 20 (06) : 1979 - 1986
  • [34] LEVOSIMENDAN VS DOBUTAMINE IN SEPTIC SHOCK. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Pabon, Miguel Coral
    Albert, Valencia
    Anacaona, Martinez
    Guzman, Natalia
    Nieto, Vitor Hugo
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2014, 42 (12)
  • [35] Timing of norepinephrine initiation in patients with septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Yuting
    Li, Hongxiang
    Zhang, Dong
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2020, 24 (01)
  • [36] Timing of norepinephrine initiation in patients with septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yuting Li
    Hongxiang Li
    Dong Zhang
    [J]. Critical Care, 24
  • [37] Frequency and mortality of sepsis and septic shock in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Yan-Cun
    Yao, Ying
    Yu, Mu-Ming
    Gao, Yu-Lei
    Qi, An-Long
    Jiang, Tian-Yu
    Chen, Zhen-Sen
    Shou, Song-Tao
    Chai, Yan-Fen
    [J]. BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [38] Frequency and mortality of sepsis and septic shock in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yan-Cun Liu
    Ying Yao
    Mu-Ming Yu
    Yu-Lei Gao
    An-Long Qi
    Tian-Yu Jiang
    Zhen-Sen Chen
    Song-Tao Shou
    Yan-Fen Chai
    [J]. BMC Infectious Diseases, 22
  • [39] Effect of midodrine on the prognosis of patients with septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    He, Q. -F.
    Xing, X. -K.
    Wang, T. -Q.
    Jiang, Z. -X.
    Zhang, G.
    [J]. EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 27 (09) : 4211 - 4220
  • [40] Polymyxin B Hemoperfusion for Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Terayama, Takero
    Yamakawa, Kazuma
    Umemura, Yutaka
    Aihara, Morio
    Fujimi, Satoshi
    [J]. SURGICAL INFECTIONS, 2017, 18 (03) : 225 - 233