Terlipressin for the treatment of septic shock in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:6
|
作者
Huang, Lili [1 ]
Zhang, Shi [1 ]
Chang, Wei [1 ]
Xia, Feiping [1 ]
Liu, Songqiao [1 ]
Yang, Yi [1 ]
Qiu, Haibo [1 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Sch Med, Zhongda Hosp, Dept Crit Care Med, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Catecholamine; Terlipressin (TP); Adults; Shock; Septic; SURVIVING SEPSIS CAMPAIGN; INTERNATIONAL GUIDELINES; ARGININE-VASOPRESSIN; MANAGEMENT; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1186/s12871-020-00965-4
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background Catecholamines are the first-line vasopressors used in patients with septic shock. However, the search for novel drug candidates is still of great importance due to the development of adrenergic hyposensitivity accompanied by a decrease in catecholamine activity. Terlipressin (TP) is a synthetic vasopressin analogue used in the management of patients with septic shock. In the current study, we aimed to compare the effects of TP and catecholamine infusion in treating septic shock patients. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted by searching articles published in PUBMED, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials between inception and July 2018. We only selected randomized controlled trials evaluating the use of TP and catecholamine in adult patients with septic shock. The primary outcome was overall mortality. The secondary outcomes were the ICU length of stay, haemodynamic changes, tissue perfusion, renal function, and adverse events. Results A total of 9 studies with 850 participants were included in the analysis. Overall, no significant difference in mortality was observed between the TP and catecholamine groups (risk ratio(RR), 0.85 (0.70 to 1.03); P = 0.09). In patients < 60 years old, the mortality rate was lower in the TP group than in the catecholamine group (RR, 0.66 (0.50 to 0.86); P = 0.002). There was no significant difference in the ICU length of stay (mean difference, MD), - 0.28 days; 95% confidence interval (CI), - 1.25 to 0.69; P = 0.58). Additionally, TP improved renal function. The creatinine level was decreased in patients who received TP therapy compared to catecholamine-treated participants (standard mean difference, SMD), - 0.65; 95% CI, - 1.09 to - 0.22; P = 0.003). No significant difference was found regarding the total adverse events (Odds Ratio(OR), 1.48(0.51 to 4.24); P = 0.47), whereas peripheral ischaemia was more common in the TP group (OR, 8.65(1.48 to 50.59); P = 0.02). Conclusion The use of TP was associated with reduced mortality in septic shock patients less than 60 years old. TP may also improve renal function and cause more peripheral ischaemia. PROSPERO registry: CRD42016035872.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Terlipressin for the treatment of septic shock in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lili Huang
    Shi Zhang
    Wei Chang
    Feiping Xia
    Songqiao Liu
    Yi Yang
    Haibo Qiu
    [J]. BMC Anesthesiology, 20
  • [2] Terlipressin Versus Norepinephrine for Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Huang, Po
    Guo, Yuhong
    Li, Bo
    Liu, Qingquan
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 10
  • [3] Vasopressors for the Treatment of Septic Shock: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Avni, Tomer
    Lador, Adi
    Lev, Shaul
    Leibovici, Leonard
    Paul, Mical
    Grossman, Alon
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (08):
  • [4] TERLIPRESSIN COMBINED WITH NOREPINEPHRINE IN THE TREATMENT OF SEPTIC SHOCK: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Mao, Fengkai
    Liang, Dongcheng
    Tang, Zewen
    Xu, Yuxuan
    Lin, Leqing
    [J]. SHOCK, 2023, 60 (04): : 479 - 486
  • [5] Vasopressin and Terlipressin in the Treatment of Vasodilatory Septic Shock: A Systematic Review
    Soong, Jie Lin
    Lim, Wai Hing
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF SINGAPORE HEALTHCARE, 2011, 20 (03) : 208 - 218
  • [6] Norepinephrine in Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Ruslan, Muhammad Azfar
    Baharuddin, Kamarul Aryffin
    Noor, Norhayati Mohd
    Yazid, Mohd Boniami
    Noh, Abu Yazid Md
    Rahman, Andey
    [J]. WESTERN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 22 (02) : 196 - 203
  • [7] Safety and Efficacy of Corticosteroids for the Treatment of Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Sligl, Wendy I.
    Milner, Danny A., Jr.
    Sundar, Sugantha
    Mphatswe, Wendy
    Majumdar, Sumit R.
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2009, 49 (01) : 93 - 101
  • [8] Terlipressin in the treatment of hepatorenal syndrome A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Haiqing
    Liu, Aixiang
    Bo, Wentao
    Feng, Xielin
    Hu, Yong
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (16)
  • [9] Vasopressin and its analog terlipressin versus norepinephrine in the treatment of septic shock: a meta-analysis
    Tan, Jixiang
    Chen, Hong
    Chen, Xiaoying
    Zhang, Dan
    He, Faming
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2016, 9 (07): : 14183 - 14190
  • [10] Hydrocortisone with fludrocortisone for septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yamamoto, Ryo
    Nahara, Isao
    Toyosaki, Mitsunobu
    Fukuda, Tatsuma
    Masuda, Yoshiki
    Fujishima, Seitaro
    [J]. ACUTE MEDICINE & SURGERY, 2020, 7 (01):