Safety and Efficacy of Corticosteroids for the Treatment of Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:107
|
作者
Sligl, Wendy I. [1 ,2 ]
Milner, Danny A., Jr. [4 ]
Sundar, Sugantha [5 ]
Mphatswe, Wendy [6 ]
Majumdar, Sumit R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Med, Div Infect Dis, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Dept Med, Div Crit Care Med, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[3] Univ Alberta, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[4] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Pathol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesia, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[6] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Div Maternal & Child Hlth, Dept Pediat & Child Hlth, Kwa Zulu, South Africa
关键词
DOSE STEROID-THERAPY; SEVERE SEPSIS; ANTIMICROBIAL THERAPY; HYDROCORTISONE; SURVIVAL; HYPOTENSION; MANAGEMENT; REVERSAL; OUTCOMES; ONSET;
D O I
10.1086/599343
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Septic shock is common and results in significant morbidity and mortality. Adjunctive treatment with corticosteroids is common, but definitive data are lacking. We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of corticosteroid therapy among patients with septic shock. Methods. Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched for randomized trials and observational studies published from January 1993 through December 2008. Studies were selected if they included adults with septic shock, discussed treatment with intravenous corticosteroids, and reported at least 1 outcome of interest (e. g., mortality, shock reversal, or incidence of superinfection). Two reviewers independently agreed on eligibility, assessed methodologic quality, and abstracted data. Results. Pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for 28-day all-cause mortality, shock reversal at 7 days, and incidence of superinfection with use of random-effects models. Analyses, stratified by adrenal responsiveness, were prespecified. Eight studies (6 randomized trials) involving a total of 1876 patients were selected. Overall, corticosteroid therapy did not result in a statistically significant difference in mortality (42.2% [369 of 875 patients] vs. 38.4% [384 of 1001]; RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.84-1.18). A statistically significant difference in the incidence of shock reversal at 7 days was observed between patients who received corticosteroids and those who did not (64.9% [314 of 484 patients] vs. 47.5% [228 of 480]; RR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.22-1.64), with similar point estimates for both corticotropin stimulation test responders and nonresponders. No statistically significant difference was found in the incidence of superinfection between patients treated with corticosteroids and patients not treated with corticosteroids (25.3% [114 of 450 patients] vs. 22.7% [100 of 441]; RR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.86-1.42). Conclusions. In patients with septic shock, corticosteroid therapy appears to be safe but does not reduce 28-day all-cause mortality rates. It does, however, significantly reduce the incidence of vasopressor-dependent shock, which may be a clinically worthwhile goal.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 101
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Corticosteroids in septic shock: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Gibbison, Ben
    Lopez-Lopez, Jose A.
    Higgins, Julian P. T.
    Miller, Tom
    Angelini, Gianni D.
    Lightman, Stafford L.
    Annane, Djillali
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2017, 21
  • [2] Corticosteroids in septic shock: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Ben Gibbison
    José A. López-López
    Julian P. T. Higgins
    Tom Miller
    Gianni D. Angelini
    Stafford L. Lightman
    Djillali Annane
    [J]. Critical Care, 21
  • [3] Corticosteroids for severe sepsis and septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Annane, D
    Bellissant, E
    Bollaert, PE
    Briegel, J
    Keh, D
    Kupfer, Y
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 329 (7464): : 480 - 484
  • [4] Clinical efficacy and safety of vitamin C in the treatment of septic shock patients: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cai, Bingbing
    Lv, Xue
    Lin, Ming
    Feng, Changfu
    Chen, Changneng
    [J]. ANNALS OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (04) : 1369 - 1380
  • [5] The Efficacy and Safety Of Therapeutic Aheresis In Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Rimmer, Emily K.
    Houston, Brett L.
    Kumar, Anand
    Abou-Setta, Ahmed
    Friesen, Carol
    Turgeon, Alexis F.
    Cook, Deborah J.
    Houston, Donald S.
    Zarychanski, Ryan
    [J]. BLOOD, 2013, 122 (21)
  • [6] Vasopressors for the Treatment of Septic Shock: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Avni, Tomer
    Lador, Adi
    Lev, Shaul
    Leibovici, Leonard
    Paul, Mical
    Grossman, Alon
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (08):
  • [7] THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ADJUNCTIVE CORTICOSTEROIDS IN THE TREATMENT OF TUBERCULOUS PLEURISY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Xie, Shuanshuan
    Wang, Changhui
    [J]. RESPIROLOGY, 2017, 22 : 214 - 214
  • [8] The efficacy and safety of adjunctive corticosteroids in the treatment of tuberculous pleurisyA systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xie, Shuanshuan
    Wang, Changhui
    Li, Ming
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2017, 50
  • [9] The efficacy and safety of adjunctive corticosteroids in the treatment of tuberculous pleurisy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xie, Shuanshuan
    Lu, Lin
    Li, Ming
    Xiong, Mengting
    Zhou, Shunping
    Zhang, Guoliang
    Peng, Aimei
    Wang, Changhui
    [J]. ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (47) : 83315 - 83322
  • [10] The efficacy and safety of plasma exchange in patients with sepsis and septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rimmer, Emily
    Houston, Brett L.
    Kumar, Anand
    Abou-Setta, Ahmed M.
    Friesen, Carol
    Marshall, John C.
    Rock, Gail
    Turgeon, Alexis F.
    Cook, Deborah J.
    Houston, Donald S.
    Zarychanski, Ryan
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2014, 18 (06)