MU variability in CBCT-guided online adaptive radiation therapy

被引:0
|
作者
Tanny, Sean [1 ,3 ]
Dona Lemus, Olga M. [1 ]
Wancura, Joshua [1 ]
Sperling, Nicholas [2 ]
Webster, Matthew [1 ]
Jung, Hyunuk [1 ]
Zhou, Yuwei [1 ]
Li, Fiona [1 ]
Yoon, Jihyung [1 ]
Podgorsak, Alexander [1 ]
Zheng, Dandan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, New York, NY USA
[2] Univ Toledo, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Toledo, OH USA
[3] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Wilmot Canc Inst, 601 Elmwood Ave, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
来源
关键词
adaptive radiotherapy; CBCT-based adaptive RT; ethos-based adaptive; MU variability; patient specific QA; plan QA; APERTURE COMPLEXITY;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.14440
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeCBCT-guided online-adaptive radiotherapy (oART) systems have been made possible by using artificial intelligence and automation to substantially reduce treatment planning time during on-couch adaptive sessions. Evaluating plans generated during an adaptive session presents significant challenges to the clinical team as the planning process gets compressed into a shorter window than offline planning. We identified MU variations up to 30% difference between the adaptive plan and the reference plan in several oART sessions that caused the clinical team to question the accuracy of the oART dose calculation. We investigated the cause of MU variation and the overall accuracy of the dose delivered when MU variations appear unnecessarily large.MethodsDosimetric and adaptive plan data from 604 adaptive sessions of 19 patients undergoing CBCT-guided oART were collected. The analysis included total MU per fraction, planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OAR) volumes, changes in PTV-OAR overlap, and DVH curves. Sessions with MU greater than two standard deviations from the mean were reoptimized offline, verified by an independent calculation system, and measured using a detector array.ResultsMU variations relative to the reference plan were normally distributed with a mean of -1.0% and a standard deviation of 11.0%. No significant correlation was found between MU variation and anatomic changes. Offline reoptimization did not reliably reproduce either reference or on-couch total MUs, suggesting that stochastic effects within the oART optimizer are likely causing the variations. Independent dose calculation and detector array measurements resulted in acceptable agreement with the planned dose.ConclusionsMU variations observed between oART plans were not caused by any errors within the oART workflow. Providers should refrain from using MU variability as a way to express their confidence in the treatment planning accuracy. Clinical decisions during on-couch adaptive sessions should rely on validated secondary dose calculations to ensure optimal plan selection.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] CBCT-guided Winston Lutz test
    Casals Farran, J.
    Calvo Ortega, J. F.
    Pozo Masso, M.
    Moragues Femenia, S.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 : S257 - S257
  • [42] CBCT-guided management of compound odontome
    Marappa Sathyamoorthy, Senthil Kumar
    Chakrika, Harini
    Dhinakaran, Murugesan
    BMJ CASE REPORTS, 2021, 14 (09)
  • [43] A head and neck treatment planning strategy for a CBCT-guided ring-gantry online adaptive radiotherapy system
    Nasser, Nour
    Yang, George Q.
    Koo, Jihye
    Bowers, Mark
    Greco, Kevin
    Feygelman, Vladimir
    Moros, Eduardo G.
    Caudell, Jimmy J.
    Redler, Gage
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023,
  • [44] Seminal Vesicle Interfraction Displacement and Dose Variations Throughout the CBCT-Guided Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer
    Oksuz, D. C.
    Dincbas, F. O.
    Ergen, S. A.
    Iktueren, B.
    Bakir, A.
    Koca, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 90 : S429 - S430
  • [45] Plan Quality and Feasibility of Adaptive CBCT-Guided Prostate and Nodal Volume SBRT
    Laugeman, E.
    Price, A.
    Prusator, M.
    Henke, L.
    Baumann, B.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (06)
  • [46] Assessment of the impact of CBCT-guided online adaptation on dose distribution in cervical cancer
    Shelley, C.
    Bolt, M.
    Hollingdale, R.
    Rashid, M.
    Reinlo, S.
    Fazel, N.
    Adams, E.
    Stewart, A.
    South, C.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 170 : S1497 - S1498
  • [47] Radiographer-Led, CBCT-Guided Online Adaptive Radiotherapy for Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Using Artificial Intelligence
    Shelley, C.
    Hollingdale, R.
    Bolt, M.
    Rashid, M.
    Reinlo, S.
    Fazel, N.
    Thorpe, C.
    Chadwick, S.
    Barnard, A.
    South, C. P.
    Goh, C.
    Adams, E. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2022, 114 (03): : E105 - E105
  • [48] Empirical analysis of a plan-of-the-day strategy to approximate daily online reoptimization for prostate CBCT-guided adaptive radiotherapy
    Yock, Adam D.
    Cooney, Annie
    Morales-Paliza, Manuel
    Shinohara, Eric
    Homann, Kenneth
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 25 (01):
  • [49] Synthetic CT-aided multiorgan segmentation for CBCT-guided adaptive pancreatic radiotherapy
    Dai, Xianjin
    Lei, Yang
    Wynne, Jacob
    Janopaul-Naylor, James
    Wang, Tonghe
    Roper, Justin
    Curran, Walter J.
    Liu, Tian
    Patel, Pretesh
    Yang, Xiaofeng
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (11) : 7063 - 7073
  • [50] Liver Motion During CBCT-Guided SBRT
    Park, Justin C.
    Park, Sung Ho
    Song, Bongyong
    Song, William Y.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (06) : 3682 - 3682