MU variability in CBCT-guided online adaptive radiation therapy

被引:0
|
作者
Tanny, Sean [1 ,3 ]
Dona Lemus, Olga M. [1 ]
Wancura, Joshua [1 ]
Sperling, Nicholas [2 ]
Webster, Matthew [1 ]
Jung, Hyunuk [1 ]
Zhou, Yuwei [1 ]
Li, Fiona [1 ]
Yoon, Jihyung [1 ]
Podgorsak, Alexander [1 ]
Zheng, Dandan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, New York, NY USA
[2] Univ Toledo, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Toledo, OH USA
[3] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Wilmot Canc Inst, 601 Elmwood Ave, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
来源
关键词
adaptive radiotherapy; CBCT-based adaptive RT; ethos-based adaptive; MU variability; patient specific QA; plan QA; APERTURE COMPLEXITY;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.14440
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeCBCT-guided online-adaptive radiotherapy (oART) systems have been made possible by using artificial intelligence and automation to substantially reduce treatment planning time during on-couch adaptive sessions. Evaluating plans generated during an adaptive session presents significant challenges to the clinical team as the planning process gets compressed into a shorter window than offline planning. We identified MU variations up to 30% difference between the adaptive plan and the reference plan in several oART sessions that caused the clinical team to question the accuracy of the oART dose calculation. We investigated the cause of MU variation and the overall accuracy of the dose delivered when MU variations appear unnecessarily large.MethodsDosimetric and adaptive plan data from 604 adaptive sessions of 19 patients undergoing CBCT-guided oART were collected. The analysis included total MU per fraction, planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OAR) volumes, changes in PTV-OAR overlap, and DVH curves. Sessions with MU greater than two standard deviations from the mean were reoptimized offline, verified by an independent calculation system, and measured using a detector array.ResultsMU variations relative to the reference plan were normally distributed with a mean of -1.0% and a standard deviation of 11.0%. No significant correlation was found between MU variation and anatomic changes. Offline reoptimization did not reliably reproduce either reference or on-couch total MUs, suggesting that stochastic effects within the oART optimizer are likely causing the variations. Independent dose calculation and detector array measurements resulted in acceptable agreement with the planned dose.ConclusionsMU variations observed between oART plans were not caused by any errors within the oART workflow. Providers should refrain from using MU variability as a way to express their confidence in the treatment planning accuracy. Clinical decisions during on-couch adaptive sessions should rely on validated secondary dose calculations to ensure optimal plan selection.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] CBCT-guided evolutive library for cervix adaptive IMRT
    Rigaud, B.
    Simon, A.
    Gobeli, M.
    Lafond, C.
    Williaume, D.
    Leseur, J.
    Castelli, J.
    Haigron, P.
    De Crevoisier, R.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 123 : S186 - S187
  • [22] A high-resolution cone beam computed tomography (HRCBCT) reconstruction framework for CBCT-guided online adaptive therapy
    Park, Justin C.
    Song, Bongyong
    Liang, Xiaoying
    Lu, Bo
    Tan, Jun
    Parisi, Alessio
    Denbeigh, Janet
    Yaddanpudi, Sridhar
    Choi, Byongsu
    Kim, Jin Sung
    Furutani, Keith M.
    Beltran, Chris J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 50 (10) : 6490 - 6501
  • [23] A Raw Data Correction and Iterative Reconstruction Pipeline for Quantitative CBCT-Guided Radiation Therapy
    Bayat, F.
    Eldib, M.
    Miften, M.
    Altunbas, C.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E223 - E223
  • [24] Implementation of RTT-led workflow for CBCT-guided online adaptive radiotherapy in head and neck
    Darby, P.
    Fox, J.
    Bromiley, A.
    Burnett, C.
    Munn, N.
    Redgwell, N.
    McLellan, J.
    Moleron, R.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 170 : S1650 - S1650
  • [25] Benefits of bespoke PTV margins for bladder cancer using CBCT-guided online adaptive radiotherapy
    Bolt, M.
    Shelley, C.
    Hollingdale, R.
    Goh, C.
    Adams, E.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 182 : S730 - S731
  • [26] Rapid Organ-At-Risk Delineation in Pancreatic CBCT for CBCT-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy
    Dai, X.
    Lei, Y.
    Janopaul-naylor, J.
    Wynne, J.
    Wang, T.
    Zhou, J.
    Roper, J.
    Bradley, J.
    Patel, P.
    Liu, T.
    Yang, X.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (06)
  • [27] CBCT-guided Prostate Adaptive Radiotherapy with CBCT-based Synthetic MRI and CT
    Yang, X.
    Lei, Y.
    Wang, T.
    Liu, Y.
    Tian, S.
    Dong, X.
    Jiang, X.
    Jani, A.
    Curran, W. J., Jr.
    Patel, P. R.
    Liu, T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 105 (01): : S250 - S250
  • [28] Evaluating CBCT-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer Using Synthetic CBCT Data
    Olberg, Sven
    Thompson, Leah L.
    Roberts, Hannah J.
    Wo, Jennifer Y.
    Hong, Theodore S.
    Wolfgang, John
    Grassberger, Clemens
    Pursley, Jennifer
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2025, 32 (02)
  • [29] Rapid unpaired CBCT-based synthetic CT for CBCT-guided adaptive radiotherapy
    Wynne, Jacob F.
    Lei, Yang
    Pan, Shaoyan
    Wang, Tonghe
    Pasha, Mosa
    Luca, Kirk
    Roper, Justin
    Patel, Pretesh
    Patel, Sagar A.
    Godette, Karen
    Jani, Ashesh B.
    Yang, Xiaofeng
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 24 (10):
  • [30] Rapid Unpaired CBCT-Based Synthetic CT for CBCT-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy
    Wynne, J. F.
    Lei, Y.
    Pan, S.
    Wang, T.
    Roper, J. R.
    Patel, P. R.
    Patel, S. A.
    Godette, K. D.
    Jani, A.
    Yang, X.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2023, 117 (02): : S179 - S179