MU variability in CBCT-guided online adaptive radiation therapy

被引:0
|
作者
Tanny, Sean [1 ,3 ]
Dona Lemus, Olga M. [1 ]
Wancura, Joshua [1 ]
Sperling, Nicholas [2 ]
Webster, Matthew [1 ]
Jung, Hyunuk [1 ]
Zhou, Yuwei [1 ]
Li, Fiona [1 ]
Yoon, Jihyung [1 ]
Podgorsak, Alexander [1 ]
Zheng, Dandan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, New York, NY USA
[2] Univ Toledo, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Toledo, OH USA
[3] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Wilmot Canc Inst, 601 Elmwood Ave, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
来源
关键词
adaptive radiotherapy; CBCT-based adaptive RT; ethos-based adaptive; MU variability; patient specific QA; plan QA; APERTURE COMPLEXITY;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.14440
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeCBCT-guided online-adaptive radiotherapy (oART) systems have been made possible by using artificial intelligence and automation to substantially reduce treatment planning time during on-couch adaptive sessions. Evaluating plans generated during an adaptive session presents significant challenges to the clinical team as the planning process gets compressed into a shorter window than offline planning. We identified MU variations up to 30% difference between the adaptive plan and the reference plan in several oART sessions that caused the clinical team to question the accuracy of the oART dose calculation. We investigated the cause of MU variation and the overall accuracy of the dose delivered when MU variations appear unnecessarily large.MethodsDosimetric and adaptive plan data from 604 adaptive sessions of 19 patients undergoing CBCT-guided oART were collected. The analysis included total MU per fraction, planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OAR) volumes, changes in PTV-OAR overlap, and DVH curves. Sessions with MU greater than two standard deviations from the mean were reoptimized offline, verified by an independent calculation system, and measured using a detector array.ResultsMU variations relative to the reference plan were normally distributed with a mean of -1.0% and a standard deviation of 11.0%. No significant correlation was found between MU variation and anatomic changes. Offline reoptimization did not reliably reproduce either reference or on-couch total MUs, suggesting that stochastic effects within the oART optimizer are likely causing the variations. Independent dose calculation and detector array measurements resulted in acceptable agreement with the planned dose.ConclusionsMU variations observed between oART plans were not caused by any errors within the oART workflow. Providers should refrain from using MU variability as a way to express their confidence in the treatment planning accuracy. Clinical decisions during on-couch adaptive sessions should rely on validated secondary dose calculations to ensure optimal plan selection.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Study On Monitor Unit (MU) Variability Over Adaptive Treatment Courses for CBCT-Guided Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy
    Lemus, O.
    Zheng, D.
    Pacella, M.
    Cummings, M.
    Qiu, H.
    Joyce, N.
    Webster, M.
    Jung, H.
    Yoon, J.
    Burns, N.
    Hagenbach, E.
    Badzinski, R.
    Tanny, S.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E716 - E716
  • [2] Influence of air mapping errors on the dosimetric accuracy of prostate CBCT-guided online adaptive radiation therapy
    Lemus, Olga M. Dona
    Tanny, Sean
    Cummings, Michael
    Webster, Matthew
    Wancura, Joshua
    Jung, Hyunuk
    Zhou, Yuwei
    Yoon, Jihyung
    Pacella, Matthew
    Zheng, Dandan
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 24 (10):
  • [3] Deep-Learning Based CBCT Image Correction for CBCT-Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy
    Harms, J.
    Lei, Y.
    Wang, T.
    Zhang, R.
    Zhou, J.
    Dong, X.
    Patel, P.
    Higgins, K.
    Tang, X.
    Curran, W.
    Liu, T.
    Yang, X.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E499 - E499
  • [4] CBCT-guided online adaptive radiotherapy in patients with cervical cancer
    Zwart, L.
    Koch, S.
    Haverkate, L.
    Hendriksen, E.
    Koiter, E.
    Dasselaar, J.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 182 : S1151 - S1152
  • [5] Tracking OAR Volume and DVH Variability in the Initial Cohort of Pelvic Patients Treated with CBCT-Guided, Online Adaptive Therapy
    Tanny, S.
    Sperling, N. N.
    Zheng, D.
    Lemus, O. Dona
    Joyce, N.
    Qiu, H. C., Jr.
    Cummings, M. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2022, 114 (03): : E598 - E598
  • [6] Evaluation of the DIRs driving a CBCT-guided online adaptive radiotherapy system
    Quinn, A.
    Kipritidis, J.
    Booth, J.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 161 : S1290 - S1291
  • [7] Delineation variability for rectal boost RT: the role of RTTs in CBCT-guided online-adaptive RT
    Pierrard, Julien
    Dechambre, David
    Vaandering, Aude
    Massih, Christel Abdel
    Cvilic, Sophie
    Roma, Ana Da Silva Chambel
    Henderickx, Pascale
    Heylen, Sofie
    Longton, Eleonore
    Mony, Romain
    Tenabene, Mohamed Amine
    Tison, Thais
    Vandermeulen, Ad
    Veken, Loic Vander
    Etume, Aniko Wale
    Yeo, Anne-Emmanuella
    Van Ooteghem, Genevieve
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S5967 - S5971
  • [8] Intrafraction prostate motion during CBCT-guided online adaptive radiotherapy
    Zwart, L.
    Jasper, J.
    Vrieze, E.
    ten Asbroek, L.
    Ong, F.
    Koch, S.
    van Dieren, E.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 170 : S1491 - S1491
  • [9] Towards CBCT-guided online adaptive radiotherapy for prostate cancer patients
    Zwart, L.
    Ong, F.
    ten Asbroek, L.
    van Dieren, E.
    Koch, S.
    Bhawanie, A.
    de Wit, E.
    Dasselaar, J.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 161 : S368 - S368
  • [10] Online adaptive CBCT-guided VMAT radiotherapy using an Elekta Synergy CBCT-linac
    Koerkamp, M. Groot
    Bol, G.
    Kroon, P.
    Scheeren, A.
    Zoetelief, A.
    Krikke, L.
    Harderwijk, T.
    Plat, A.
    van der Vegt, S.
    Hes, J.
    van Gasteren, I.
    Schimmel-de Kogel, G.
    Renders, E.
    van Kaam, J.
    Onnink-Vijfvinkel, R.
    Winkel, D.
    van Rijssel, M.
    Wopereis, A.
    Noteboom, J.
    van de Pol, S.
    Eppinga, W.
    van Zyp, J. van der Voort
    van Es, C.
    Bossenga, J.
    Raaymakers, B.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 182 : S1695 - S1696