Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, and Triangulation Research Simplified

被引:1
|
作者
Kawar, Lina Najib [1 ,2 ]
Dunbar, Ghada B. [3 ,4 ]
Aquino-Maneja, Emma M. [5 ]
Flores, Sarah L. [6 ,7 ,8 ]
Squier, Victoria Rondez [9 ,10 ]
Failla, Kim Reina [11 ]
机构
[1] Nursing Res & Evidence Based Practice Program, 393 E Walnut St, Pasadena, CA 91188 USA
[2] Kaiser Permanente Southern Calif & Hawaii Market, Patient Care Serv, 393 E Walnut St, Pasadena, CA 91188 USA
[3] Kaiser Permanente Southern Calif & Hawaii Market, Patient Care Serv, Nursing Profess Dev & Educ, Pasadena, CA 91188 USA
[4] Kaiser Permanente Southern Calif & Hawaii Market, Southern Calif & Hawaii New Grad RN Transit Practi, Patient Care Serv, Pasadena, CA 91188 USA
[5] Kaiser Permanente Southern Calif Patient Care Serv, Patient Care Serv, Pasadena, CA USA
[6] Biola Univ, Hlth Div, La Mirada, CA USA
[7] Biola Univ, Nursing, La Mirada, CA USA
[8] Childrens Hosp Orange Cty, Orange, CA USA
[9] Unitek Coll, Pract Nursing Program, Reno Campus, Reno, NV USA
[10] Charles Drew Univ, DNP Program, Los Angeles, CA USA
[11] Sharp HealthCare, Caster Nursing Inst, Nursing Workforce Transit, San Diego, CA USA
来源
关键词
D O I
10.3928/00220124-20240328-03
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
For the novice nurse researcher, identifying a clinical researchable problem may be simple, but discerning an appropriate research approach may be daunting. What are the differences among quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, and triangulation research? Which method is applicable for the study one wants to conduct? This article discusses the two main research traditions (quantitative and qualitative) and the differences and similarities in methods for frontline nurses. It simplifies and clarifies how the reader might enhance the rigor of the research study by using mixed methods or triangulation. The four types of research are described, and examples are provided to support readers to plan projects, use the most appropriate method, and effectively communicate findings. [ J Contin Educ Nurs. 2024;55(7):338-344.]
引用
收藏
页码:338 / 344
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Revisiting the Quantitative-Qualitative Debate: Implications for Mixed-Methods Research
    Joanna E. M. Sale
    Lynne H. Lohfeld
    Kevin Brazil
    Quality and Quantity, 2002, 36 : 43 - 53
  • [32] Revisiting the quantitative-qualitative debate: Implications for mixed-methods research
    Sale, JEM
    Lohfeld, LH
    Brazil, K
    QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2002, 36 (01) : 43 - 53
  • [33] MIXED METHODS RESEARCH: INTEGRATING QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE APPROACHES IN THE SOCIAL AND EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES
    Breitenbach, Andrea
    2011 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION (ICERI), 2011, : 5782 - 5791
  • [34] Criteria for Quantitative and Qualitative Data Integration Mixed-Methods Research Methodology
    Lee, Seonah
    Smith, Carrol A. M.
    CIN-COMPUTERS INFORMATICS NURSING, 2012, 30 (05) : 251 - 256
  • [37] Researching health: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods
    Pearson, Charlotte
    HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY, 2007, 15 (06) : 601 - 603
  • [38] Discrepancies between qualitative and quantitative evaluation of randomised controlled trial results: achieving clarity through mixed methods triangulation
    Sarah Tonkin-Crine
    Sibyl Anthierens
    Kerenza Hood
    Lucy Yardley
    Jochen W. L. Cals
    Nick A. Francis
    Samuel Coenen
    Alike W. van der Velden
    Maciek Godycki-Cwirko
    Carl Llor
    Chris C. Butler
    Theo J. M. Verheij
    Herman Goossens
    Paul Little
    Implementation Science, 11
  • [39] Researching health: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods
    Kemp, Lynn
    JOURNAL OF MIXED METHODS RESEARCH, 2008, 2 (01) : 109 - 110
  • [40] RESEARCHING HEALTH: QUALITATIVE, QUANTITATIVE AND MIXED METHODS
    Fozdar, Farida
    HEALTH SOCIOLOGY REVIEW, 2008, 17 (04): : 429 - 430