Deep learning bias correction of GEMS tropospheric NO2: A comparative validation of NO2 from GEMS and TROPOMI using Pandora observations

被引:4
|
作者
Ghahremanloo, Masoud [1 ]
Choi, Yunsoo [1 ]
Singh, Deveshwar [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Houston, Dept Earth & Atmospher Sci, Houston, TX 77004 USA
关键词
Satellite remote sensing; Deep learning bias correction; Geostationary Environment Monitoring; Spectrometer (GEMS); TROPOMI; Pandora observation; Tropospheric NO 2; AIR-QUALITY; SATELLITE RETRIEVALS; EMISSIONS; ABSORPTION; CHEMISTRY; AIRBORNE; IMPACT; OZONE; SHIPS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.envint.2024.108818
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Despite advancements in satellite instruments, such as those in geostationary orbit, biases continue to affect the accuracy of satellite data. This research pioneers the use of a deep convolutional neural network to correct bias in tropospheric column density of NO2 (TCDNO2) from the Geostationary Environment Monitoring Spectrometer (GEMS) during 2021-2023. Initially, we validate GEMS TCDNO2 against Pandora observations and compare its accuracy with measurements from the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI). GEMS displays acceptable accuracy in TCDNO2 measurements, with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.68, an index of agreement (IOA) of 0.79, and a mean absolute bias (MAB) of 5.73321 x 1015 molecules/cm2, though it is not highly accurate. The evaluation showcases moderate to high accuracy of GEMS TCDNO2 across all Pandora stations, with R values spanning from 0.46 to 0.80. Comparing TCDNO2 from GEMS and TROPOMI at TROPOMI overpass time shows satisfactory performance of GEMS TCDNO2 measurements, achieving R, IOA, and MAB values of 0.71, 0.78, and 6.82182 x 1015 molecules/cm2, respectively. However, these figures are overshadowed by TROPOMI's superior accuracy, which reports R, IOA, and MAB values of 0.81, 0.89, and 3.26769 x 1015 molecules/cm2, respectively. While GEMS overestimates TCDNO2 by 52 % at TROPOMI overpass time, TROPOMI underestimates it by 9 %. The deep learning bias corrected GEMS TCDNO2 (GEMS-DL) demonstrates a marked enhancement in the accuracy of original GEMS TCDNO2 measurements. The GEMS-DL product improves R from 0.68 to 0.88, IOA from 0.79 to 0.93, MAB from 5.73321 x 1015 to 2.67659 x 1015 molecules/cm2, and reduces MAB percentage (MABP) from 64 % to 30 %. This represents a significant reduction in bias, exceeding 50 %. Although the original GEMS product overestimates TCDNO2 by 28 %, the GEMS-DL product remarkably minimizes this error, underestimating TCDNO2 by a mere 1 %. Spatial cross-validation across Pandora stations shows a significant reduction in MABP, from a range of 45 %-105.6 % in original GEMS data to 24 %-59 % in GEMS-DL.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of TROPOMI and OMI Tropospheric NO2 Products Using Measurements from MAX-DOAS and State-Controlled Stations in the Jiangsu Province of China
    Cai, Kun
    Li, Shenshen
    Lai, Jibao
    Xia, Yu
    Wang, Yapeng
    Hu, Xuefei
    Li, Ang
    ATMOSPHERE, 2022, 13 (06)
  • [42] Quantitative bias estimates for tropospheric NO2 columns retrieved from SCIAMACHY, OMI, and GOME-2 using a common standard for East Asia
    Irie, H.
    Boersma, K. F.
    Kanaya, Y.
    Takashima, H.
    Pan, X.
    Wang, Z. F.
    ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2012, 5 (10) : 2403 - 2411
  • [43] Ozone Pollution of Megacity Shanghai during City-Wide Lockdown Assessed Using TROPOMI Observations of NO2 and HCHO
    Xue, Ruibin
    Wang, Shanshan
    Zhang, Sanbao
    Zhan, Jingfang
    Zhu, Jian
    Gu, Chuanqi
    Zhou, Bin
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (24)
  • [44] Relating satellite NO2 tropospheric columns to near-surface concentrations: implications from ground-based MAX-DOAS NO2 vertical profile observations
    Chang, Bowen
    Liu, Haoran
    Zhang, Chengxin
    Xing, Chengzhi
    Tan, Wei
    Liu, Cheng
    NPJ CLIMATE AND ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCE, 2025, 8 (01):
  • [45] Validation of TROPOMI tropospheric NO2 columns using dual-scan multi-axis differential optical absorption spectroscopy (MAX-DOAS) measurements in Uccle, Brussels
    Dimitropoulou, Ermioni
    Hendrick, Francois
    Pinardi, Gaia
    Friedrich, Martina M.
    Merlaud, Alexis
    Tack, Frederik
    De Longueville, Helene
    Fayt, Caroline
    Hermans, Christian
    Laffineur, Quentin
    Fierens, Frans
    Van Roozendael, Michel
    ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2020, 13 (10) : 5165 - 5191
  • [46] Monitoring and Comparative Analysis of NO2 and HCHO in Shanghai Using Dual-Azimuth Scanning MAX-DOAS and TROPOMI
    Ren, Hongmei
    Li, Ang
    Hu, Zhaokun
    Shao, Nannan
    Yang, Xinyan
    Zhang, Hairong
    Xu, Jiangman
    Ma, Jinji
    REMOTE SENSING, 2025, 17 (03)
  • [47] Measurements of Tropospheric NO2 in Romania Using a Zenith-Sky Mobile DOAS System and Comparisons with Satellite Observations
    Constantin, Daniel-Eduard
    Merlaud, Alexis
    Van Roozendael, Michel
    Voiculescu, Mirela
    Fayt, Caroline
    Hendrick, Francois
    Pinardi, Gaia
    Georgescu, Lucian
    SENSORS, 2013, 13 (03): : 3922 - 3940
  • [48] Retrieval of tropospheric NO2 using the MAX-DOAS method combined with relative intensity measurements for aerosol correction
    Vlemmix, T.
    Piters, A. J. M.
    Stammes, P.
    Wang, P.
    Levelt, P. F.
    ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2010, 3 (05) : 1287 - 1305
  • [49] First high-resolution tropospheric NO2 observations from the Ultraviolet Visible Hyperspectral Imaging Spectrometer (UVHIS)
    Xi, Liang
    Si, Fuqi
    Jiang, Yu
    Zhou, Haijin
    Zhan, Kai
    Chang, Zhen
    Qiu, Xiaohan
    Yang, Dongshang
    ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2021, 14 (01) : 435 - 454
  • [50] Assessment of tropospheric NO2 concentrations over greater Doha using Sentinel-5 TROPOspheric monitoring instrument (TROPOMI) satellite data: Temporal analysis, 2018-2023
    Mohieldeen, Yasir E.
    Moosakutty, Shamjad P.
    Fountoukis, Christos
    Siddique, Azhar
    Ayoub, Mohammed A.
    Alfarra, M. Rami
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2024, 362