Induced Seismicity Forecasting with Uncertainty Quantification: Application to the Groningen Gas Field

被引:0
|
作者
Kaveh, Hojjat [1 ,2 ]
Batlle, Pau [3 ]
Acosta, Mateo [2 ]
Kulkarni, Pranav [4 ]
Bourne, Stephen J. [5 ]
Avouac, Jean Philippe [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] CALTECH, Mech & Civil Engn, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
[2] CALTECH, Geol & Planetary Sci Div, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
[3] CALTECH, Comp & Math Sci, Pasadena, CA USA
[4] CALTECH, Elect Engn, Pasadena, CA USA
[5] Shell Global Solut Int BV, Amsterdam, Netherlands
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
EARTHQUAKE PRODUCTION; CONSTITUTIVE LAW; COMPACTION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1785/0220230179
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Reservoir operations for gas extraction, fluid disposal, carbon dioxide storage, or geothermal energy production are capable of inducing seismicity. Modeling tools exist for seismicity forecasting using operational data, but the computational costs and uncertainty quantification (UQ) pose challenges. We address this issue in the context of seismicity induced by gas production from the Groningen gas field using an integrated modeling framework, which combines reservoir modeling, geomechanical modeling, and stress -based earthquake forecasting. The framework is computationally efficient thanks to a 2D finite -element reservoir model, which assumes vertical flow equilibrium, and the use of semianalytical solutions to calculate poroelastic stress changes and predict seismicity rate. The earthquake nucleation model is based on rate -and -state friction and allows for an initial strength excess so that the faults are not assumed initially critically stressed. We estimate uncertainties in the predicted number of earthquakes and magnitudes. To reduce the computational costs, we assume that the stress model is true, but our UQ algorithm is general enough that the uncertainties in reservoir and stress models could be incorporated. We explore how the selection of either a Poisson or a Gaussian likelihood influences the forecast. We also use a synthetic catalog to estimate the improved forecasting performance that would have resulted from a better seismicity detection threshold. Finally, we use tapered and nontapered Gutenberg -Richter distributions to evaluate the most probable maximum magnitude over time and account for uncertainties in its estimation. Although we did not formally account for uncertainties in the stress model, we tested several alternative stress models, and found negligible impact on the predicted temporal evolution of seismicity and forecast uncertainties. Our study shows that the proposed approach yields realistic estimates of the uncertainties of temporal seismicity and is applicable for operational forecasting or induced seismicity monitoring. It can also be used in probabilistic traffic light systems.
引用
收藏
页码:773 / 790
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Physics-based forecasting of induced seismicity at Groningen gas field, the Netherlands
    Dempsey, David
    Suckale, Jenny
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2017, 44 (15) : 7773 - 7782
  • [2] Development of statistical geomechanical models for forecasting seismicity induced by gas production from the Groningen field
    Bourne, Stephen J.
    Oates, Stephen J.
    [J]. NETHERLANDS JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES-GEOLOGIE EN MIJNBOUW, 2017, 96 (05): : S175 - S182
  • [3] Induced seismicity of the Groningen gas field: History and recent developments
    Van Thienen-Visser, K.
    Breunese, J.N.
    [J]. Leading Edge, 2015, 34 (06): : 664 - 671
  • [4] Using machine learning for model benchmarking and forecasting of depletion-induced seismicity in the Groningen gas field
    Limbeck, Jan
    Bisdom, Kevin
    Lanz, Fabian
    Park, Timothy
    Barbaro, Eduardo
    Bourne, Stephen
    Kiraly, Franz
    Bierman, Stijn
    Harris, Chris
    Nevenzeel, Keimpe
    den Bezemer, Taco
    van Elk, Jan
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL GEOSCIENCES, 2021, 25 (01) : 529 - 551
  • [5] Using machine learning for model benchmarking and forecasting of depletion-induced seismicity in the Groningen gas field
    Jan Limbeck
    Kevin Bisdom
    Fabian Lanz
    Timothy Park
    Eduardo Barbaro
    Stephen Bourne
    Franz Kiraly
    Stijn Bierman
    Chris Harris
    Keimpe Nevenzeel
    Taco den Bezemer
    Jan van Elk
    [J]. Computational Geosciences, 2021, 25 : 529 - 551
  • [6] Clustering characteristics of gas-extraction induced seismicity in the Groningen gas field
    Muntendam-Bos, A. G.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 221 (02) : 879 - 892
  • [7] The Relationship between M and ML: A Review and Application to Induced Seismicity in the Groningen Gas Field, The Netherlands
    Dost, Bernard
    Edwards, Benjamin
    Bommer, Julian J.
    [J]. SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 89 (03) : 1062 - 1074
  • [8] Earthquake ground motion modeling of induced seismicity in the Groningen gas field
    Paolucci, R.
    Mazzieri, I.
    Piunno, G.
    Smerzini, C.
    Vanini, M.
    Ozcebe, A. G.
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2021, 50 (01): : 135 - 154
  • [9] Production induced subsidence and seismicity in the Groningen gas field - can it be managed?
    de Waal, J. A.
    Muntendam-Bos, A. G.
    Roest, J. P. A.
    [J]. Prevention and Mitigation of Natural and Anthropogenic Hazards due to Land Subsidence, 2015, 372 : 129 - 139
  • [10] Natural time and nowcasting induced seismicity at the Groningen gas field in the Netherlands
    Luginbuhl, Molly
    Rundle, John B.
    Turcotte, Donald L.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 215 (02) : 753 - 759