Induced Seismicity Forecasting with Uncertainty Quantification: Application to the Groningen Gas Field

被引:4
|
作者
Kaveh, Hojjat [1 ,2 ]
Batlle, Pau [3 ]
Acosta, Mateo [2 ]
Kulkarni, Pranav [4 ]
Bourne, Stephen J. [5 ]
Avouac, Jean Philippe [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] CALTECH, Mech & Civil Engn, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
[2] CALTECH, Geol & Planetary Sci Div, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
[3] CALTECH, Comp & Math Sci, Pasadena, CA USA
[4] CALTECH, Elect Engn, Pasadena, CA USA
[5] Shell Global Solut Int BV, Amsterdam, Netherlands
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
EARTHQUAKE PRODUCTION; CONSTITUTIVE LAW; COMPACTION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1785/0220230179
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Reservoir operations for gas extraction, fluid disposal, carbon dioxide storage, or geothermal energy production are capable of inducing seismicity. Modeling tools exist for seismicity forecasting using operational data, but the computational costs and uncertainty quantification (UQ) pose challenges. We address this issue in the context of seismicity induced by gas production from the Groningen gas field using an integrated modeling framework, which combines reservoir modeling, geomechanical modeling, and stress -based earthquake forecasting. The framework is computationally efficient thanks to a 2D finite -element reservoir model, which assumes vertical flow equilibrium, and the use of semianalytical solutions to calculate poroelastic stress changes and predict seismicity rate. The earthquake nucleation model is based on rate -and -state friction and allows for an initial strength excess so that the faults are not assumed initially critically stressed. We estimate uncertainties in the predicted number of earthquakes and magnitudes. To reduce the computational costs, we assume that the stress model is true, but our UQ algorithm is general enough that the uncertainties in reservoir and stress models could be incorporated. We explore how the selection of either a Poisson or a Gaussian likelihood influences the forecast. We also use a synthetic catalog to estimate the improved forecasting performance that would have resulted from a better seismicity detection threshold. Finally, we use tapered and nontapered Gutenberg -Richter distributions to evaluate the most probable maximum magnitude over time and account for uncertainties in its estimation. Although we did not formally account for uncertainties in the stress model, we tested several alternative stress models, and found negligible impact on the predicted temporal evolution of seismicity and forecast uncertainties. Our study shows that the proposed approach yields realistic estimates of the uncertainties of temporal seismicity and is applicable for operational forecasting or induced seismicity monitoring. It can also be used in probabilistic traffic light systems.
引用
收藏
页码:773 / 790
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Relationship between M and ML: A Review and Application to Induced Seismicity in the Groningen Gas Field, The Netherlands (vol 89, pg 1062, 2018)
    Dost, Bernard
    Edwards, Benjamin
    Bommer, Julian J.
    SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 90 (04) : 1660 - 1662
  • [32] Inelastic Deformation of the Slochteren Sandstone: Stress-Strain Relations and Implications for Induced Seismicity in the Groningen Gas Field
    Pijnenburg, R. P. J.
    Verberne, B. A.
    Hangx, S. J. T.
    Spiers, C. J.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2019, 124 (05) : 5254 - 5282
  • [33] The exponential rise of induced seismicity with increasing stress levels in the Groningen gas field and its implications for controlling seismic risk
    Bourne, S. J.
    Oates, S. J.
    van Elk, J.
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 213 (03) : 1693 - 1700
  • [34] Hazard and risk assessments for induced seismicity in Groningen
    van Elk, Jan
    Doornhof, Dirk
    Bommer, Julian J.
    Bourne, Stephen J.
    Oates, Steve J.
    Pinho, Rui
    Crowley, Helen
    NETHERLANDS JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES-GEOLOGIE EN MIJNBOUW, 2017, 96 (05): : S259 - S269
  • [35] Probabilistic Moment Tensor Inversion for Hydrocarbon-Induced Seismicity in the Groningen Gas Field, The Netherlands, Part 1: Testing
    Kuehn, Daniela
    Heimann, Sebastian
    Isken, Marius P.
    Ruigrok, Elmer
    Dost, Bernard
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2020, 110 (05) : 2095 - 2111
  • [36] Depletion-Induced Seismicity at the Groningen Gas Field: Coulomb Rate-and-State Models Including Differential Compaction Effect
    Candela, Thibault
    Osinga, Sander
    Ampuero, Jean-Paul
    Wassing, Brecht
    Pluymaekers, Maarten
    Fokker, Peter A.
    van Wees, Jan-Diederik
    de Waal, Hans A.
    Muntendam-Bos, Annemarie G.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2019, 124 (07) : 7081 - 7104
  • [37] Computational modelling of masonry with a view to Groningen induced seismicity
    Rots, J. G.
    Messali, F.
    Esposito, R.
    Jafari, S.
    Mariani, V.
    STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF HISTORICAL CONSTRUCTIONS: ANAMNESIS, DIAGNOSIS, THERAPY, CONTROLS, 2016, : 227 - 238
  • [38] A review of source models to further the understanding of the seismicity of the Groningen field
    Kuhn, Daniela
    Hainzl, Sebastian
    Dahm, Torsten
    Richter, Gudrun
    Vera Rodriguez, Ismael
    NETHERLANDS JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES-GEOLOGIE EN MIJNBOUW, 2022, 101
  • [39] Coulomb threshold rate-and-state model for fault reactivation: application to induced seismicity at Groningen
    Heimisson, Elias R.
    Smith, Jonathan D.
    Avouac, Jean-Philippe
    Bourne, Stephen J.
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 228 (03) : 2061 - 2072
  • [40] Mapping liquefaction based on CPT data for induced seismicity in Groningen
    Korff, M.
    Meijers, P.
    Wiersma, A.
    Kloosterman, F.
    EARTHQUAKE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FOR PROTECTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSTRUCTIONS, 2019, 4 : 3418 - 3425