Induced Seismicity Forecasting with Uncertainty Quantification: Application to the Groningen Gas Field

被引:0
|
作者
Kaveh, Hojjat [1 ,2 ]
Batlle, Pau [3 ]
Acosta, Mateo [2 ]
Kulkarni, Pranav [4 ]
Bourne, Stephen J. [5 ]
Avouac, Jean Philippe [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] CALTECH, Mech & Civil Engn, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
[2] CALTECH, Geol & Planetary Sci Div, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
[3] CALTECH, Comp & Math Sci, Pasadena, CA USA
[4] CALTECH, Elect Engn, Pasadena, CA USA
[5] Shell Global Solut Int BV, Amsterdam, Netherlands
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
EARTHQUAKE PRODUCTION; CONSTITUTIVE LAW; COMPACTION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1785/0220230179
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Reservoir operations for gas extraction, fluid disposal, carbon dioxide storage, or geothermal energy production are capable of inducing seismicity. Modeling tools exist for seismicity forecasting using operational data, but the computational costs and uncertainty quantification (UQ) pose challenges. We address this issue in the context of seismicity induced by gas production from the Groningen gas field using an integrated modeling framework, which combines reservoir modeling, geomechanical modeling, and stress -based earthquake forecasting. The framework is computationally efficient thanks to a 2D finite -element reservoir model, which assumes vertical flow equilibrium, and the use of semianalytical solutions to calculate poroelastic stress changes and predict seismicity rate. The earthquake nucleation model is based on rate -and -state friction and allows for an initial strength excess so that the faults are not assumed initially critically stressed. We estimate uncertainties in the predicted number of earthquakes and magnitudes. To reduce the computational costs, we assume that the stress model is true, but our UQ algorithm is general enough that the uncertainties in reservoir and stress models could be incorporated. We explore how the selection of either a Poisson or a Gaussian likelihood influences the forecast. We also use a synthetic catalog to estimate the improved forecasting performance that would have resulted from a better seismicity detection threshold. Finally, we use tapered and nontapered Gutenberg -Richter distributions to evaluate the most probable maximum magnitude over time and account for uncertainties in its estimation. Although we did not formally account for uncertainties in the stress model, we tested several alternative stress models, and found negligible impact on the predicted temporal evolution of seismicity and forecast uncertainties. Our study shows that the proposed approach yields realistic estimates of the uncertainties of temporal seismicity and is applicable for operational forecasting or induced seismicity monitoring. It can also be used in probabilistic traffic light systems.
引用
收藏
页码:773 / 790
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Liquefaction Hazard in the Groningen Region of the Netherlands due to Induced Seismicity
    Green, R. A.
    Bommer, J. J.
    Stafford, P. J.
    Maurer, B. W.
    Kruiver, P. P.
    Edwards, B.
    Rodriguez-Marek, A.
    de Lange, G.
    Oates, S. J.
    Storck, T.
    Omidi, P.
    Bourne, S. J.
    van Elk, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 146 (08)
  • [42] Mapping liquefaction based on CPT data for induced seismicity in Groningen
    Korff, M.
    Meijers, P.
    Wiersma, A.
    Kloosterman, F.
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FOR PROTECTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSTRUCTIONS, 2019, 4 : 3418 - 3425
  • [43] Stress-Dependent Magnitudes of Induced Earthquakes in the Groningen Gas Field
    Bourne, S. J.
    Oates, S. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2020, 125 (11)
  • [44] Estimating the Maximum Magnitude of Induced Earthquakes in the Groningen Gas Field, the Netherlands
    Bommer, Julian J.
    van Elk, Jan
    Zoback, Mark D.
    [J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2024, 114 (06) : 2804 - 2822
  • [45] Probabilistic earthquake locations of induced seismicity in the Groningen region, the Netherlands
    Smith, Jonathan D.
    White, Robert S.
    Avouac, Jean-Philippe
    Bourne, Stephen
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 222 (01) : 507 - 516
  • [46] Extreme Threshold Failures Within a Heterogeneous Elastic Thin Sheet and the Spatial-Temporal Development of Induced Seismicity Within the Groningen Gas Field
    Bourne, S. J.
    Oates, S. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2017, 122 (12) : 10299 - 10320
  • [47] Pseudo-Prospective Forecasting of Induced and Natural Seismicity in the Hengill Geothermal Field
    Ritz, V. A.
    Mizrahi, L.
    Repolles, V. Clasen
    Rinaldi, A. P.
    Hjoerleifsdottir, V.
    Wiemer, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2024, 129 (03)
  • [48] Waveform-based Bayesian full moment tensor inversion and uncertainty determination for the induced seismicity in an oil/gas field
    Gu, Chen
    Marzouk, Youssef M.
    Toksoz, M. Nafi
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 212 (03) : 1963 - 1985
  • [49] Hamiltonian Monte Carlo to Characterize Induced Earthquakes: Application to a ML 3.4 Event in the Groningen Gas Field and the Role of Prior
    Masfara, La Ode Marzujriban
    Weemstra, Cornelis
    [J]. EARTH AND SPACE SCIENCE, 2024, 11 (01)
  • [50] Keeping up the pressure at Groningen gas field
    Timmermans, JH
    Niezen, H
    [J]. SEVENTY-EIGHTH ANNUAL CONVENTION OF THE GAS PROCESSORS ASSOCIATION, PROCEEDINGS, 1999, : 269 - 272