Using machine learning for model benchmarking and forecasting of depletion-induced seismicity in the Groningen gas field

被引:7
|
作者
Limbeck, Jan [1 ]
Bisdom, Kevin [1 ]
Lanz, Fabian [2 ]
Park, Timothy [1 ]
Barbaro, Eduardo [2 ]
Bourne, Stephen [1 ]
Kiraly, Franz [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Bierman, Stijn [1 ]
Harris, Chris [1 ]
Nevenzeel, Keimpe [1 ,2 ]
den Bezemer, Taco [5 ]
van Elk, Jan [5 ]
机构
[1] Shell Global Solut Int BV, Grasweg 31, NL-1031 HW Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] IBM Serv Netherlands, Johan Huizingalaan 765, NL-1066 VH Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT, England
[4] Alan Turing Inst, 96 Euston Rd, London NW1 2DB, England
[5] Nederlandse Aardolie Maatschappij, Schepersmaat 2, NL-9405 TA Assen, Netherlands
关键词
Seismicity forecasting; Groningen gas field; Machine learning; Model benchmarking; Depletion-induced seismicity; Geomechanics; Earthquakes; GEOMECHANICAL MODELS; ONE NEURON; FAULT; CLASSIFICATION; EARTHQUAKES; SUBSIDENCE; TRANSIENTS; DISCOVERY; SELECTION; PRESSURE;
D O I
10.1007/s10596-020-10023-0
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The Groningen gas field in the Netherlands is experiencing induced seismicity as a result of ongoing depletion. The physical mechanisms that control seismicity have been studied through rock mechanical experiments and combined physical-statistical models to support development of a framework to forecast induced-seismicity risks. To investigate whether machine learning techniques such as Random Forests and Support Vector Machines bring new insights into forecasts of induced seismicity rates in space and time, a pipeline is designed that extends time-series analysis methods to a spatiotemporal framework with a factorial setup, which allows probing a large parameter space of plausible modelling assumptions, followed by a statistical meta-analysis to account for the intrinsic uncertainties in subsurface data and to ensure statistical significance and robustness of results. The pipeline includes model validation using e.g. likelihood ratio tests against average depletion thickness and strain thickness baselines to establish whether the models have statistically significant forecasting power. The methodology is applied to forecast seismicity for two distinctly different gas production scenarios. Results show that seismicity forecasts generated using Support Vector Machines significantly outperform beforementioned baselines. Forecasts from the method hint at decreasing seismicity rates within the next 5 years, in a conservative production scenario, and no such decrease in a higher depletion scenario, although due to the small effective sample size no statistically solid statement of this kind can be made. The presented approach can be used to make forecasts beyond the investigated 5-years period, although this requires addition of limited physics-based constraints to avoid unphysical forecasts.
引用
收藏
页码:529 / 551
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Using machine learning for model benchmarking and forecasting of depletion-induced seismicity in the Groningen gas field
    Jan Limbeck
    Kevin Bisdom
    Fabian Lanz
    Timothy Park
    Eduardo Barbaro
    Stephen Bourne
    Franz Kiraly
    Stijn Bierman
    Chris Harris
    Keimpe Nevenzeel
    Taco den Bezemer
    Jan van Elk
    Computational Geosciences, 2021, 25 : 529 - 551
  • [2] Depletion-Induced Seismicity at the Groningen Gas Field: Coulomb Rate-and-State Models Including Differential Compaction Effect
    Candela, Thibault
    Osinga, Sander
    Ampuero, Jean-Paul
    Wassing, Brecht
    Pluymaekers, Maarten
    Fokker, Peter A.
    van Wees, Jan-Diederik
    de Waal, Hans A.
    Muntendam-Bos, Annemarie G.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2019, 124 (07) : 7081 - 7104
  • [3] Induced Seismicity Forecasting with Uncertainty Quantification: Application to the Groningen Gas Field
    Kaveh, Hojjat
    Batlle, Pau
    Acosta, Mateo
    Kulkarni, Pranav
    Bourne, Stephen J.
    Avouac, Jean Philippe
    SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 95 (2A) : 773 - 790
  • [4] Physics-based forecasting of induced seismicity at Groningen gas field, the Netherlands
    Dempsey, David
    Suckale, Jenny
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2017, 44 (15) : 7773 - 7782
  • [5] Reservoir creep and induced seismicity: inferences from geomechanical modeling of gas depletion in the Groningen field
    van Wees, Jan-Diederik
    Osinga, Sander
    Van Thienen-Visser, Karin
    Fokker, Peter A.
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 212 (03) : 1487 - 1497
  • [6] Development of statistical geomechanical models for forecasting seismicity induced by gas production from the Groningen field
    Bourne, Stephen J.
    Oates, Stephen J.
    NETHERLANDS JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES-GEOLOGIE EN MIJNBOUW, 2017, 96 (05): : S175 - S182
  • [7] Induced seismicity of the Groningen gas field: History and recent developments
    Van Thienen-Visser, K.
    Breunese, J.N.
    Leading Edge, 2015, 34 (06): : 664 - 671
  • [8] Forecasting induced seismicity in Oklahoma using machine learning methods
    Yan Qin
    Ting Chen
    Xiaofei Ma
    Xiaowei Chen
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [9] Forecasting induced seismicity in Oklahoma using machine learning methods
    Qin, Yan
    Chen, Ting
    Ma, Xiaofei
    Chen, Xiaowei
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [10] Simulations for the development of a ground motion model for induced seismicity in the Groningen gas field, The Netherlands
    Edwards, B.
    Zurek, B.
    van Dedem, E.
    Stafford, P. J.
    Oates, S.
    van Elk, J.
    deMartin, B.
    Bommer, J. J.
    BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2019, 17 (08) : 4441 - 4456