Impact of Preoperative Symptom Duration on Patient-reported Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

被引:0
|
作者
Hartman, Timothy J. [1 ]
Nie, James W. [1 ]
Anwar, Fatima N. [1 ]
Roca, Andrea M. [1 ]
Loya, Alexandra C. [1 ]
Medakkar, Srinath S. [1 ]
MacGregor, Keith R. [1 ]
Oyetayo, Omolabake O. [1 ]
Zheng, Eileen [1 ]
Federico, Vincent P. [1 ]
Massel, Dustin H. [1 ]
Sayari, Arash J. [1 ]
Lopez, Gregory D. [1 ]
Singh, Kern [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthoped Surg, 1611 W Harrison St,Suite 300, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
来源
CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY | 2024年 / 37卷 / 06期
关键词
PROMs; degenerative spondylolisthesis; MIS-TLIF; MCID; CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; WORKERS-COMPENSATION CLAIMS; LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS; SURGERY; DISABILITY; COSTS; CARE;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0000000000001560
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: To assess the impact of preoperative symptom duration (PSD) on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after minimally invasive (MIS) transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for degenerative spondylolisthesis (DSpond). Background: A prolonged duration of preoperative symptoms may implicate inferior long-term outcomes postsurgery. Prior studies of lumbar fusion recipients are limited by the inclusion of heterogeneous populations. Methods: A single-surgeon registry was retrospectively queried for privately insured patients who had undergone primary, elective, single-level MIS-TLIF for DSpond with a recorded symptom start date. Cohorts were formed by PSD: shorter duration (PSD <1 y) or greater duration (GD; PSD >= 1 y). PROMs evaluated included Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Physical Function, Oswestry Disability Index, Visual Analog Scale-Back, Visual Analog Scale-Leg, and 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire. The magnitude of PROM (triangle PROM) improvement from preoperative baseline to 6 weeks and final follow-up (triangle PROM-FF) were compared between cohorts. Intercohort achievement rates of a minimum clinically important difference in each PROM were compared. Results: A total of 133 patients included 85 patients with GD cohort. There were no significant differences in pre hoc demographics and perioperative characteristics between cohorts, as well as preoperative, 6-week, or final follow-up PROMs between cohorts. Both cohorts demonstrated significant improvement in all PROMs at 6 weeks and final follow-up (P <= 0.049, all). There were no significant intercohort differences demonstrated in minimum clinically important difference achievement rates, triangle PROM-6W, or triangle PROM-FF in any PROM. Conclusions: Regardless of the symptom duration before MIS-TLIF for DSpond, patients demonstrate significant improvement in physical function, pain, disability, and mental health. Patients with a GD of preoperative symptoms did not report inferior scores in any PROM domain. Patients with a GD of preoperative symptoms did not suffer inferior rates of clinically meaningful improvement after surgical intervention. These findings should be considered when counseling patients before surgical intervention for DSpond.
引用
收藏
页码:E239 / E244
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis in patients with significant obesity
    Lau, Darryl
    Ziewacz, John
    Park, Paul
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 20 (01) : 80 - 83
  • [42] Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Treatment of Low-Grade Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
    Bovonratwet, Patawut
    Samuel, Andre M.
    Mok, Jung Kee
    Vaishnav, Avani S.
    Morse, Kyle W.
    Song, Junho
    Steinhaus, Michael E.
    Jordan, Yusef J.
    Gang, Catherine H.
    Qureshi, Sheeraz A.
    SPINE, 2022, 47 (21) : 1505 - 1514
  • [43] Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis
    Massie, Lara W.
    Zakaria, Hesham Mostafa
    Schultz, Lonni R.
    Basheer, Azam
    Buraimoh, Morenikeji Ayodele
    Chang, Victor
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2018, 44 (01)
  • [44] Minimally Invasive Decompression With Noninstrumented Facet Fusion Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Stenosis Associated With Grade 1 Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
    Kim, Daniel C.
    Laskay, Nicholas
    Alcala, Christopher
    Schwender, James
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2023, 36 (10): : E416 - E422
  • [45] Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Disk Disease and Spondylolisthesis Grade I Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery
    Brodano, Giovanni B.
    Martikos, Konstantinos
    Lolli, Francesco
    Gasbarrini, Alessandro
    Cioni, Alfredo
    Bandiera, Stefano
    Di Silvestre, Mario
    Boriani, Stefano
    Greggi, Tiziana
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2015, 28 (10): : E559 - E564
  • [46] Minimally invasive unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of spinal stenosis and modified transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis
    Chen, Kevin S.
    Than, Khoi D.
    LaMarca, Frank
    Park, Paul
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2013, 35
  • [47] A Comparison of Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Grade 1 Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: An Analysis of the Prospective Quality Outcomes Database
    Chan, Andrew Kai-Hong
    Bisson, Erica F.
    Bydon, Mohamad
    Glassman, Steven D.
    Foley, Kevin T.
    Shaffrey, Christopher I.
    Potts, Eric A.
    Shaffrey, Mark E.
    Coric, Domagoj
    Knightly, John J.
    Park, Paul
    Wang, Michael Y.
    Fu, Kai-Ming G.
    Slotkin, Jonathan
    Asher, Anthony L.
    Virk, Michael S.
    Kerezoudis, Panagiotis
    Alvi, Mohammed A.
    Guan, Jian
    Haid, Regis W.
    Mummaneni, Praveen V.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 66 : 100 - 100
  • [48] PROMIS Physical Function for prediction of postoperative pain, narcotics consumption, and patient-reported outcomes following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Patel, Dil, V
    Bawa, Mundeep S.
    Haws, Brittany E.
    Khechen, Benjamin
    Block, Andrew M.
    Karmarkar, Sailee S.
    Lamoutte, Eric H.
    Singh, Kern
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2019, 30 (04) : 476 - 482
  • [49] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Diseases
    Fan Shunwu
    Zhao Xing
    Zhao Fengdong
    Fang Xiangqian
    SPINE, 2010, 35 (17) : 1615 - 1620
  • [50] A Comparison of Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Grade 1 Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: An Analysis of the Prospective Quality Outcomes Database
    Chan, Andrew K.
    Bisson, Erica F.
    Bydon, Mohamad
    Foley, Kevin T.
    Glassman, Steven D.
    Shaffrey, Christopher, I
    Wang, Michael Y.
    Park, Paul
    Potts, Eric A.
    Shaffrey, Mark E.
    Coric, Domagoj
    Knightly, John J.
    Fu, Kai-Ming
    Slotkin, Jonathan R.
    Asher, Anthony L.
    Virk, Michael S.
    Kerezoudis, Panagiotis
    Alvi, Mohammed A.
    Guan, Jian
    Haid, Regis W.
    Mummaneni, Praveen, V
    NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 87 (03) : 555 - 562