Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis in patients with significant obesity

被引:35
|
作者
Lau, Darryl [1 ]
Ziewacz, John [1 ]
Park, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Neurosurg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Minimally invasive; Obesity; Spine; Spondylolisthesis; Surgical complications; Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; SPINE SURGERY; RISK-FACTOR; IMPACT; OSTEOARTHRITIS; COMPLICATIONS; DISEASE; HAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.jocn.2012.07.004
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Comparative studies evaluating efficacy and safety of minimally invasive spinal fusion between patients with significant obesity (body mass index [BMI] >= 35 kg/m(2)) and those of normal weight are scarce. We examined complication rates and outcomes for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MITLIF) in patients with significant obesity and those of normal weight undergoing treatment for symptomatic spondylolisthesis. Patients with a BMI >= 35 kg/m(2) or <25 kg/m(2) undergoing elective MITLIF for symptomatic spondylolisthesis for the period 2006-09 were identified. Of the 16 patients identified, nine patients with a mean BMI of 37.4 kg/m(2) were included in the obese group, while seven patients with a mean BMI of 23.4 kg/m(2) comprised the normal weight group. Estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, complication rate, length of hospital stay, and clinical outcomes were assessed. Outcome measures included patient-reported visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaire completed by the patient. No significant differences were found in blood loss (p = 0.436), hospital stay (p = 0.606), or number of surgical complications (p = 0.920) between the two groups. Mean follow-up intervals were 15.0 months for patients with obesity, and 18.6 months for those of normal weight. Both groups had significant improvements in VAS (obese, p = 0.003: normal, p = 0.016) and ODI (obese, p = 0.020: normal, p = 0.034) scores. There were no statistically significant differences between normal weight and obese groups in postoperative VAS (p = 0.728) and ODI (p = 0.886) scores. Patients with significant obesity experienced clinical improvement similar to that of patients with normal weight, suggesting that obesity does not impact MITLIF outcomes. In addition, both groups experienced similar complication rates, operative times, EBL, and length of hospital stay. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 83
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and spondylolisthesis
    Tsahtsarlis, Antonio
    Wood, Martin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 19 (06) : 858 - 861
  • [2] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis
    Elboghdady, Islam M.
    Naqvi, Abbas
    Jorgenson, Anton Y.
    Marquez-Lara, Alejandro
    Singh, Kern
    [J]. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2014, 2 (10)
  • [3] Comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and midline lumbar interbody fusion in patients with spondylolisthesis
    Wang, Yang-Yi
    Chung, Yu-Hsuan
    Huang, Chun-Hsien
    Hu, Ming-Hsien
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2024, 19 (01)
  • [4] Minimally invasive surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis: transforaminal or oblique lumbar interbody fusion
    Sheng, Sun-Ren
    Geng, Yi-Bo
    Zhou, Kai-Liang
    Wu, Ai-Min
    Wang, Xiang-Yang
    Ni, Wen-Fei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2020, 9 (01) : 45 - 51
  • [5] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Spondylolisthesis: Comparison Between Isthmic and Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
    Kim, Jong Yeol
    Park, Jeong Yoon
    Kim, Kyung Hyun
    Kuh, Sung Uk
    Chin, Dong Kyu
    Kim, Keun Su
    Cho, Yong Eun
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 84 (05) : 1284 - 1293
  • [6] Comparison between Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MISTLIF) for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Chandra, Vemula V. R.
    Prasad, Bodapati C. M.
    Hanu, Tammireddy G.
    Kale, Pavan G.
    [J]. NEUROLOGY INDIA, 2022, 70 (01) : 127 - 134
  • [7] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Ahn, Junyoung
    Tabaraee, Ehsan
    Singh, Kern
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2015, 28 (06): : 222 - 225
  • [8] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Hoffmann, Christoph-Heinrich
    Kandziora, Frank
    [J]. OPERATIVE ORTHOPADIE UND TRAUMATOLOGIE, 2020, 32 (03): : 180 - 191
  • [9] A Comparison of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Decompression Alone for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Chan, Andrew Kai-Hong
    Bisson, Erica F.
    Bydon, Mohamad
    Glassman, Steven D.
    Foley, Kevin T.
    Shaffrey, Christopher I.
    Potts, Eric A.
    Shaffrey, Mark E.
    Coric, Domagoj
    Knightly, John J.
    Park, Paul
    Wang, Michael Y.
    Fu, Kai-Ming G.
    Slotkin, Jonathan
    Asher, Anthony L.
    Virk, Michael S.
    Kerezoudis, Panagiotis
    Alvi, Mohammed A.
    Guan, Jian
    Haid, Regis W.
    Mummaneni, Praveen V.
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 66 : 121 - 122
  • [10] Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technique Note and Comparison of Early Outcomes with Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Zhang, Hao
    Zhou, Chuanli
    Wang, Chao
    Zhu, Kai
    Tu, Qihao
    Kong, Meng
    Zhao, Chong
    Ma, Xuexiao
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL MEDICINE, 2021, 14 : 549 - 558