Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis in patients with significant obesity

被引:35
|
作者
Lau, Darryl [1 ]
Ziewacz, John [1 ]
Park, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Neurosurg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Minimally invasive; Obesity; Spine; Spondylolisthesis; Surgical complications; Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; SPINE SURGERY; RISK-FACTOR; IMPACT; OSTEOARTHRITIS; COMPLICATIONS; DISEASE; HAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.jocn.2012.07.004
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Comparative studies evaluating efficacy and safety of minimally invasive spinal fusion between patients with significant obesity (body mass index [BMI] >= 35 kg/m(2)) and those of normal weight are scarce. We examined complication rates and outcomes for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MITLIF) in patients with significant obesity and those of normal weight undergoing treatment for symptomatic spondylolisthesis. Patients with a BMI >= 35 kg/m(2) or <25 kg/m(2) undergoing elective MITLIF for symptomatic spondylolisthesis for the period 2006-09 were identified. Of the 16 patients identified, nine patients with a mean BMI of 37.4 kg/m(2) were included in the obese group, while seven patients with a mean BMI of 23.4 kg/m(2) comprised the normal weight group. Estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, complication rate, length of hospital stay, and clinical outcomes were assessed. Outcome measures included patient-reported visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaire completed by the patient. No significant differences were found in blood loss (p = 0.436), hospital stay (p = 0.606), or number of surgical complications (p = 0.920) between the two groups. Mean follow-up intervals were 15.0 months for patients with obesity, and 18.6 months for those of normal weight. Both groups had significant improvements in VAS (obese, p = 0.003: normal, p = 0.016) and ODI (obese, p = 0.020: normal, p = 0.034) scores. There were no statistically significant differences between normal weight and obese groups in postoperative VAS (p = 0.728) and ODI (p = 0.886) scores. Patients with significant obesity experienced clinical improvement similar to that of patients with normal weight, suggesting that obesity does not impact MITLIF outcomes. In addition, both groups experienced similar complication rates, operative times, EBL, and length of hospital stay. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 83
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis
    Massie, Lara W.
    Zakaria, Hesham Mostafa
    Schultz, Lonni R.
    Basheer, Azam
    Buraimoh, Morenikeji Ayodele
    Chang, Victor
    [J]. NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2018, 44 (01)
  • [32] Minimally invasive tubular surgery for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Kimball, Jon
    Yew, Andrew
    Getachew, Ruth
    Lu, Daniel C.
    [J]. NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2013, 35
  • [33] Comparison of O-arm navigation and microscope-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and conventional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis
    Peng, Peng
    Chen, Kangwu
    Chen, Hao
    Zhang, Kai
    Sun, Jiajia
    Yang, Peng
    Zhou, Feng
    Liu, Yu
    Yang, Huilin
    Mao, Haiqing
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRANSLATION, 2020, 20 : 107 - 112
  • [34] MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION WITH EXPANDABLE CAGES
    Buckland, Aaron J.
    Proctor, Dylan J.
    [J]. JBJS ESSENTIAL SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 13 (02):
  • [35] History and Evolution of the Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Prabhu, Michael C.
    Jacob, Kevin C.
    Patel, Madhav R.
    Pawlowski, Hanna
    Vanjani, Nisheka N.
    Singh, Kern
    [J]. NEUROSPINE, 2022, 19 (03) : 479 - 491
  • [36] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spine
    Chaudhary, Kshitij S.
    Groff, Michael W.
    [J]. TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2011, 26 (03) : 146 - 155
  • [37] Surgical Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Spondylolisthesis and Degenerative Segmental Instability
    Park, Yung
    Ha, Joong Won
    Lee, Yun Tae
    Oh, Hyun Chul
    Yoo, Ju Hyung
    Kim, Hyung Bok
    [J]. ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2011, 5 (04) : 228 - 236
  • [38] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Spondylolisthesis and Degenerative Spondylosis: 5-year Results
    Park, Yung
    Ha, Joong Won
    Lee, Yun Tae
    Sung, Na Young
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2014, 472 (06) : 1813 - 1823
  • [39] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Outpatient Setting
    Emami, Arash
    Faloon, Michael
    Issa, Kimona
    Shafa, Eiman
    Pourtaheri, Sina
    Sinha, Kumar
    Hwang, Ki S.
    [J]. ORTHOPEDICS, 2016, 39 (06) : E1218 - E1222
  • [40] The surgical technique of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Lawton, C. D.
    Smith, Z. A.
    Barnawi, A.
    Fessler, R. G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL SCIENCES, 2011, 55 (03) : 259 - 264