Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis

被引:46
|
作者
Massie, Lara W. [1 ]
Zakaria, Hesham Mostafa [1 ]
Schultz, Lonni R. [2 ]
Basheer, Azam [1 ]
Buraimoh, Morenikeji Ayodele [3 ]
Chang, Victor [1 ]
机构
[1] Henry Ford Hlth Syst, Dept Neurosurg, Detroit, MI USA
[2] Henry Ford Hlth Syst, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Detroit, MI USA
[3] Univ Maryland, Dept Orthoped, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
关键词
spondylolisthesis; minimally invasive; TLIF; transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; lordotic cage; DEGENERATIVE SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; LORDOSIS MISMATCH; PELVIC INCIDENCE; FOLLOW-UP; IN-SITU; LEVEL; SURGERY; RESTORATION; REDUCTION; POSTERIOR;
D O I
10.3171/2017.10.FOCUS17562
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE The inability to significantly improve sagittal parameters has been a limitation of minimally invasive surgery for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF). Traditional cages have a limited capacity to restore lordosis. This study evaluates the use of a crescent-shaped articulating expandable cage (Altera) for MIS TLIF. METHODS This is a retrospective review of 1-and 2-level MIS TLIF. Radiographic outcomes included differences in segmental and lumbar lordosis, disc height, evidence of fusion, and any endplate violations. Clinical outcomes included the numeric rating scale for leg and back pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for low-back pain. RESULTS Thirty-nine patients underwent single-level MIS TLIF, and 5 underwent 2-level MIS TLIF. The mean age was 63.1 years, with 64% women. On average, spondylolisthesis was corrected by 4.3 mm (preoperative = 6.69 mm, postoperative = 2.39 mm, p < 0.001), the segmental angle was improved by 4.94 degrees (preoperative = 5.63 degrees, postoperative = 10.58 degrees, p < 0.001), and segmental height increased by 3.1 mm (preoperative = 5.09 mm, postoperative = 8.19 mm, p < 0.001). At 90 days after surgery the authors observed the following: a smaller postoperative sagittal vertical axis was associated with larger changes in back pain at 90 days (r = -0.558, p = 0.013); a larger decrease in spondylolisthesis was associated with greater improvements in ODI and back pain scores (r = -0.425, p = 0.043, and r = -0.43, p = 0.031, respectively); and a larger decrease in pelvic tilt (PT) was associated with greater improvements in back pain (r = -0.548, p = 0.043). For the 1-year PROs, the relationship between the change in PT and changes in ODI and numeric rating scale back pain were significant (r = 0.612, p = 0.009, and r = -0.803, p = 0.001, respectively) with larger decreases in PT associated with larger improvements in ODI and back pain. Overall for this study there was a 96% fusion rate. Fourteen patients were noted to have endplate violation on intraoperative fluoroscopy during placement of the cage. Only 3 of these had progression of their subsidence, with an overall subsidence rate of 6% (3 of 49) visible on postoperative CT. CONCLUSIONS The use of this expandable, articulating, lordotic, or hyperlordotic interbody cage for MIS TLIF provides a significant restoration of segmental height and segmental lordosis, with associated improvements in sagittal balance parameters. Patients treated with this technique had acceptable levels of fusion and significant reductions in pain and disability.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion-Early Experience Using a Biplanar Expandable Cage for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Tan, Lee A.
    Rivera, Joshua
    Tan, Xiao A.
    Le, Vivian P.
    Khoo, Larry T.
    Berven, Sigurd H.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2020, 14 : S39 - S44
  • [2] Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using a novel minimally invasive expandable interbody cage: patient-reported outcomes and radiographic parameters
    Woodward, Josha
    Malone, Hani
    Witiw, Christopher D.
    Kolcun, John Paul G.
    Koro, Lacin
    Keegan, Kevin C.
    Ahmad, Shahjehan
    Kerolus, Mena G.
    David, Brian T.
    Fessler, R. David
    Fessler, Richard G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2021, 35 (02) : 170 - 176
  • [3] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and spondylolisthesis
    Tsahtsarlis, Antonio
    Wood, Martin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 19 (06) : 858 - 861
  • [4] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis
    Elboghdady, Islam M.
    Naqvi, Abbas
    Jorgenson, Anton Y.
    Marquez-Lara, Alejandro
    Singh, Kern
    [J]. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2014, 2 (10)
  • [5] MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION WITH EXPANDABLE CAGES
    Buckland, Aaron J.
    Proctor, Dylan J.
    [J]. JBJS ESSENTIAL SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 13 (02):
  • [6] Comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and midline lumbar interbody fusion in patients with spondylolisthesis
    Wang, Yang-Yi
    Chung, Yu-Hsuan
    Huang, Chun-Hsien
    Hu, Ming-Hsien
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2024, 19 (01)
  • [7] Static versus Expandable Interbody Fusion Devices: A Comparison of 1-Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Ledesma, Jonathan Andrew
    Lambrechts, Mark J.
    Dees, Azra
    Thomas, Terence
    Hiranaka, Cannon Greco
    Kurd, Mark Faisal
    Radcliff, Kris E.
    Anderson, David Greg
    [J]. ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 17 (01)
  • [8] Does loss of spondylolisthesis reduction impact clinical and radiographic outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion?
    Steinhaus, Michael E.
    Vaishnav, Avani S.
    Shah, Sachin P.
    Clark, Nicholas J.
    Chaudhary, Chirag B.
    Othman, Yahya A.
    Urakawa, Hikari
    Samuel, Andre M.
    Lovecchio, Francis C.
    Sheha, Evan D.
    McAnany, Steven J.
    Qureshi, Sheeraz A.
    [J]. SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 22 (01): : 95 - 103
  • [9] Two-Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Expandable Interbody Spacers Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Study
    Kim, Choll
    Cohen, Dan S.
    Smith, Mark D.
    Dix, Gary A.
    Luna, Ingrid Y.
    Joshua, Gita
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2020, 14 (04): : 518 - 526
  • [10] Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Disease
    Li, Hui-Min
    Zhang, Ren-Jie
    Shen, Cai-Liang
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 122 : E627 - E638