The comparison study of laminectomy with unilateral and bilateral pedicle screws fixation and laminectomy alone without fusion interbody in young patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: A randomized clinical trial

被引:0
|
作者
Hajilo, Parisa [1 ]
Imani, Behzad [2 ]
Zandi, Shirdel
Mehrafshan, Ali [3 ]
Khazaei, Salman [4 ]
机构
[1] Hamadan Univ Med Sci, Student Res Comm, Hamadan, Iran
[2] Hamadan Univ Med Sci, Sch Paramed, Dept Operating Room, Hamadan, Iran
[3] Univ Med Sciense Qom, Dept Neurosurg, Nekuii Forghani Hosp, Qom, Iran
[4] Hamadan Univ Med Sci, Hamadan, Iran
关键词
tabilization; Spine; Unilateral; Bilateral; Spinal stenosis; Lumbar; BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; DEGENERATION; SURGERY; CAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35435
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: There are many reports about the risk factors for recurrence after laminectomy surgery. Some surgeons use unilateral and bilateral fusion to provide sufficient stability to the lumbar spine. However, its strength, safety, and effectiveness in young patients are not widely known. Therefore, this study was conducted to compare surgical methods of laminectomy with unilateral and bilateral fixation and laminectomy alone without interbody fusion in young patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Methods: 90 patients eligible for lumbar spinal stenosis surgery were selected through convenience sampling and randomly divided into three groups: laminectomy without fixation (A), laminectomy with unilateral fixation (B), and bilateral fixation (C). Pain, functional disability, quality of life, recurrent disc, adjacent segment disease (ASD), and fusion rate were evaluated and compared among the three groups six months post-surgery. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 16. Results: Six months after surgery, the mean score of functional disability in the bilateral group was significantly higher than the other groups (12.92 (3.30) vs 5.52 (1.91) and 4.30 (1.84), P < 0.05). Also, the highest mean score of pain after surgery was observed in the bilateral group (4.33 (0.70) vs 1.81(0.68) and 1.63(0.56), P < 0.05). The mean score of quality of life in the unilateral group was significantly higher than the other groups (87.81 (5.67) vs 68.58 (3.08) and 56.07 (4.04), P < 0.05). No significant difference was observed between the groups (P > 0.05) regarding fusion, recurrent disc herniation, and adjacent segment disease. Conclusions: Unilateral fixation provides the same benefits as bilateral fixation but has the additional benefits of being less invasive and minimizing the disadvantages of other investigated techniques during and after surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Clinical outcomes and safety assessment in elderly patients undergoing decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective study
    Asgeir S Jakola
    Andreas Sørlie
    Sasha Gulati
    Øystein P Nygaard
    Stian Lydersen
    Tore Solberg
    BMC Surgery, 10
  • [42] Clinical outcomes and radiological instability following decompressive lumbar laminectomy for degenerative spinal stenosis: A comparison of patients undergoing concomitant arthrodesis versus decompression alone
    Fox, MW
    Onofrio, BM
    Hanssen, AD
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1996, 85 (05) : 793 - 802
  • [43] Delta large-channel endoscopy versus unilateral biportal endoscopy decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective randomized controlled trial
    Rushuo Wei
    Weiqiang Liu
    Mingdong Yu
    Yushan Zhu
    Ruzhan Yao
    Bingwu Wang
    Jesse Li-Ling
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 20 (1)
  • [44] Clinical, Radiographic and Fusion Comparison of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) stand-alone and OLIF with posterior pedicle screw fixation in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis
    Wenhao Zhao
    Chuanli Zhou
    Hao Zhang
    Jianwei Guo
    Jialuo Han
    Antao Lin
    Yan Wang
    Xuexiao Ma
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 24
  • [45] Clinical, Radiographic and Fusion Comparison of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) stand-alone and OLIF with posterior pedicle screw fixation in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis
    Zhao, Wenhao
    Zhou, Chuanli
    Zhang, Hao
    Guo, Jianwei
    Han, Jialuo
    Lin, Antao
    Wang, Yan
    Ma, Xuexiao
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2023, 24 (01)
  • [46] 1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies - Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: A prospective, randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation
    Fischgrund, JS
    Mackay, M
    Herkowitz, HN
    Brower, R
    Montgomery, DM
    Kurz, LT
    SPINE, 1997, 22 (24) : 2807 - 2812
  • [47] Decompression alone or decompression with fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: fiveyear clinical results from a randomized clinical trial
    Karlsson, T.
    Forsth, P.
    Ohagen, P.
    Michaelsson, K.
    Sanden, B.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2024, 106B (07): : 705 - 712
  • [48] Short-Term Comparison Between Unilateral Versus Bilateral Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation in Short-Level Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion-A Prospective Randomized Study
    Hiyama, Akihiko
    Katoh, Hiroyuki
    Sakai, Daisuke
    Sato, Masato
    Watanabe, Masahiko
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 14 (05) : 1485 - 1497
  • [49] Biomechanical Comparison of Stand-Alone and Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation for Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery-A Finite Element Analysis
    Fang, Guofang
    Lin, Yunzhi
    Wu, Jiachang
    Cui, Wengang
    Zhang, Shihao
    Guo, Lili
    Sang, Hongxun
    Huang, Wenghua
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 141 : E204 - E212
  • [50] Comparison of Total Laminectomy and Pedicle Screw Internal Fixation with Ultrasonic- and Microscopic-Assisted Laminectomy Replantation for Tumors of the Lumbar Spinal Canal: A Retrospective Study of 60 Cases from a Single Center
    Duan, YongChi
    Ma, Jun
    Miao, Sheng
    Zhang, JinHong
    Deng, JieLin
    Wu, Han
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2021, 27