The comparison study of laminectomy with unilateral and bilateral pedicle screws fixation and laminectomy alone without fusion interbody in young patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: A randomized clinical trial

被引:0
|
作者
Hajilo, Parisa [1 ]
Imani, Behzad [2 ]
Zandi, Shirdel
Mehrafshan, Ali [3 ]
Khazaei, Salman [4 ]
机构
[1] Hamadan Univ Med Sci, Student Res Comm, Hamadan, Iran
[2] Hamadan Univ Med Sci, Sch Paramed, Dept Operating Room, Hamadan, Iran
[3] Univ Med Sciense Qom, Dept Neurosurg, Nekuii Forghani Hosp, Qom, Iran
[4] Hamadan Univ Med Sci, Hamadan, Iran
关键词
tabilization; Spine; Unilateral; Bilateral; Spinal stenosis; Lumbar; BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; DEGENERATION; SURGERY; CAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35435
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: There are many reports about the risk factors for recurrence after laminectomy surgery. Some surgeons use unilateral and bilateral fusion to provide sufficient stability to the lumbar spine. However, its strength, safety, and effectiveness in young patients are not widely known. Therefore, this study was conducted to compare surgical methods of laminectomy with unilateral and bilateral fixation and laminectomy alone without interbody fusion in young patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Methods: 90 patients eligible for lumbar spinal stenosis surgery were selected through convenience sampling and randomly divided into three groups: laminectomy without fixation (A), laminectomy with unilateral fixation (B), and bilateral fixation (C). Pain, functional disability, quality of life, recurrent disc, adjacent segment disease (ASD), and fusion rate were evaluated and compared among the three groups six months post-surgery. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 16. Results: Six months after surgery, the mean score of functional disability in the bilateral group was significantly higher than the other groups (12.92 (3.30) vs 5.52 (1.91) and 4.30 (1.84), P < 0.05). Also, the highest mean score of pain after surgery was observed in the bilateral group (4.33 (0.70) vs 1.81(0.68) and 1.63(0.56), P < 0.05). The mean score of quality of life in the unilateral group was significantly higher than the other groups (87.81 (5.67) vs 68.58 (3.08) and 56.07 (4.04), P < 0.05). No significant difference was observed between the groups (P > 0.05) regarding fusion, recurrent disc herniation, and adjacent segment disease. Conclusions: Unilateral fixation provides the same benefits as bilateral fixation but has the additional benefits of being less invasive and minimizing the disadvantages of other investigated techniques during and after surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Letter to the editor concerning "Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation with anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a comparison of postoperative outcomes"
    Feng, Zhixiao
    Huang, Chenyang
    Guo, Ziyu
    Zhang, Qi
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, : 4404 - 4405
  • [32] Comparison of Unilateral versus Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single Level Lumbar Degenerative Diseases and Review of Literature
    Isik, Hasan Serdar
    Okutan, Ozerk
    Yildirim, Timur
    Akpinar, Elif
    Yilmaz, Ali
    TURKISH NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 28 (05) : 731 - 739
  • [33] Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with cortical bone trajectory screws versus traditional pedicle screws fixation: a study protocol of randomised controlled trial
    Feng, Zhenhua
    Li, Xiaobin
    Tang, Qian
    Wang, Chenggui
    Zheng, Wenhao
    Zhang, Hui
    Wu, Ai-Min
    Tian, Naifeng
    Wu, Yaosen
    Ni, Wenfei
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (10):
  • [34] A prospective randomized controlled study comparing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion techniques for degenerative spondylolisthesis: unilateral pedicle screw and 1 cage versus bilateral pedicle screws and 2 cages Clinical article
    Aoki, Yasuchika
    Yamagata, Masatsune
    Ikeda, Yoshikazu
    Nakajima, Fumitake
    Ohtori, Seiji
    Nakagawa, Koichi
    Nakajima, Arata
    Toyone, Tomoaki
    Orita, Sumihisa
    Takahashi, Kazuhisa
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2012, 17 (02) : 153 - 159
  • [35] Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: Comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model
    Gerber, M
    Crawford, NR
    Chamberlain, RH
    Fifield, MS
    LeHuec, JC
    Dickman, CA
    SPINE, 2006, 31 (07) : 762 - 768
  • [36] Biomechanical comparison of lumbar spine instability between laminectomy and bilateral laminotomy for spinal stenosis syndrome - an experimental study in porcine model
    Tai, Ching-Lung
    Hsieh, Pang-Hsing
    Chen, Weng-Pin
    Chen, Lih-Huei
    Chen, Wen-Jer
    Lai, Po-Liang
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2008, 9 (1)
  • [37] Biomechanical comparison of lumbar spine instability between laminectomy and bilateral laminotomy for spinal stenosis syndrome – an experimental study in porcine model
    Ching-Lung Tai
    Pang-Hsing Hsieh
    Weng-Pin Chen
    Lih-Huei Chen
    Wen-Jer Chen
    Po-Liang Lai
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 9
  • [38] Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of twelve randomized controlled trials
    Ren, Siying
    Hu, Yan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2016, 9 (09): : 17113 - 17127
  • [39] Clinical outcomes and safety assessment in elderly patients undergoing decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective study
    Jakola, Asgeir S.
    Sorlie, Andreas
    Gulati, Sasha
    Nygaard, Oystein P.
    Lydersen, Stian
    Solberg, Tore
    BMC SURGERY, 2010, 10
  • [40] Long-Term Outcome after Less Invasive Surgery for Decompression of Lumbar Stenosis - A Randomized Comparison of Unilateral Laminotomy, Bilateral Laminotomy and Laminectomy
    Thome, Claudius
    Schubert, Gerrit A.
    Stier, Reinhard
    Hegewald, Aldemar A.
    Schmiedek, Peter
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2010, 113 (02) : A432 - A433