The comparison study of laminectomy with unilateral and bilateral pedicle screws fixation and laminectomy alone without fusion interbody in young patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: A randomized clinical trial

被引:0
|
作者
Hajilo, Parisa [1 ]
Imani, Behzad [2 ]
Zandi, Shirdel
Mehrafshan, Ali [3 ]
Khazaei, Salman [4 ]
机构
[1] Hamadan Univ Med Sci, Student Res Comm, Hamadan, Iran
[2] Hamadan Univ Med Sci, Sch Paramed, Dept Operating Room, Hamadan, Iran
[3] Univ Med Sciense Qom, Dept Neurosurg, Nekuii Forghani Hosp, Qom, Iran
[4] Hamadan Univ Med Sci, Hamadan, Iran
关键词
tabilization; Spine; Unilateral; Bilateral; Spinal stenosis; Lumbar; BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; DEGENERATION; SURGERY; CAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35435
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: There are many reports about the risk factors for recurrence after laminectomy surgery. Some surgeons use unilateral and bilateral fusion to provide sufficient stability to the lumbar spine. However, its strength, safety, and effectiveness in young patients are not widely known. Therefore, this study was conducted to compare surgical methods of laminectomy with unilateral and bilateral fixation and laminectomy alone without interbody fusion in young patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Methods: 90 patients eligible for lumbar spinal stenosis surgery were selected through convenience sampling and randomly divided into three groups: laminectomy without fixation (A), laminectomy with unilateral fixation (B), and bilateral fixation (C). Pain, functional disability, quality of life, recurrent disc, adjacent segment disease (ASD), and fusion rate were evaluated and compared among the three groups six months post-surgery. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 16. Results: Six months after surgery, the mean score of functional disability in the bilateral group was significantly higher than the other groups (12.92 (3.30) vs 5.52 (1.91) and 4.30 (1.84), P < 0.05). Also, the highest mean score of pain after surgery was observed in the bilateral group (4.33 (0.70) vs 1.81(0.68) and 1.63(0.56), P < 0.05). The mean score of quality of life in the unilateral group was significantly higher than the other groups (87.81 (5.67) vs 68.58 (3.08) and 56.07 (4.04), P < 0.05). No significant difference was observed between the groups (P > 0.05) regarding fusion, recurrent disc herniation, and adjacent segment disease. Conclusions: Unilateral fixation provides the same benefits as bilateral fixation but has the additional benefits of being less invasive and minimizing the disadvantages of other investigated techniques during and after surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Biportal endoscopic versus microscopic lumbar decompressive laminectomy in patients with spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial
    Park, Sang-Min
    Park, Jiwon
    Jang, Ho Su
    Heo, Young Woo
    Han, Heesoo
    Kim, Ho-Joong
    Chang, Bong-Soon
    Lee, Choon-Ki
    Yeom, Jin S.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 20 (02): : 156 - 165
  • [22] Biomechanical Stability Afforded by Unilateral Versus Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation with and without Interbody Support Using Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Godzik, Jakub
    Martinez-del-Campo, Eduardo
    Newcomb, Anna G. U. S.
    Reis, Marco T.
    Perez-Orribo, Luis
    Whiting, Alexander C.
    Singh, Vaneet
    Kelly, Brian P.
    Crawford, Neil R.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 113 : E439 - E445
  • [23] Is unilateral pedicle screw fixation as effective as bilateral pedicle screw fixation in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Lian Xu
    Xu Lin
    Chao Wu
    Lun Tan
    European Spine Journal, 2023, 32 : 700 - 711
  • [24] Is unilateral pedicle screw fixation as effective as bilateral pedicle screw fixation in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Xu, Lian
    Lin, Xu
    Wu, Chao
    Tan, Lun
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 32 (02) : 700 - 711
  • [25] Modified posterior lumbar interbody fusion using a single cage with unilateral pedicle screws: a retrospective clinical study
    Chen Bingqian
    Xue Feng
    Shen Xiaowen
    Zhang Feng
    Fang Xiaowen
    Qian Yufeng
    Dong Qirong
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2015, 10
  • [26] Modified posterior lumbar interbody fusion using a single cage with unilateral pedicle screws: a retrospective clinical study
    Chen Bingqian
    Xue Feng
    Shen Xiaowen
    Zhang Feng
    Fang Xiaowen
    Qian Yufeng
    Dong Qirong
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 10 (1)
  • [27] Comparison of the Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Full-Endoscopic Laminotomy and Conventional Subtotal Laminectomy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Kim, Jung-Hoon
    Kim, Young-Jin
    Ryu, Kyeong-Sik
    Kim, Jin-Sung
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 14 (06) : 1760 - 1770
  • [28] Minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis: clinical outcome and reoperation rates
    Alimi, Marjan
    Hofstetter, Christoph P.
    Pyo, Se Young
    Paulo, Danika
    Haertl, Roger
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2015, 22 (04) : 339 - 352
  • [29] A Simple Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Bilateral Decompression via Unilateral Approach versus Instrumented Total Laminectomy and Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Kayalar, Ali Erhan
    Onen, Mehmet Resid
    Gerilmez, Aydin
    Naderi, Sait
    TURKISH NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 29 (05) : 643 - 650
  • [30] Biomechanical Comparison of Multilevel Stand-Alone Lumbar Lateral Interbody Fusion With Posterior Pedicle Screws: An In Vitro Study
    Mok, James M.
    Lin, Ye
    Tafur, Julio Castillo
    Diaz, Roberto Leonardo
    Amirouche, Farid
    NEUROSPINE, 2023, 20 (02) : 478 - 486