The comparison study of laminectomy with unilateral and bilateral pedicle screws fixation and laminectomy alone without fusion interbody in young patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: A randomized clinical trial

被引:0
|
作者
Hajilo, Parisa [1 ]
Imani, Behzad [2 ]
Zandi, Shirdel
Mehrafshan, Ali [3 ]
Khazaei, Salman [4 ]
机构
[1] Hamadan Univ Med Sci, Student Res Comm, Hamadan, Iran
[2] Hamadan Univ Med Sci, Sch Paramed, Dept Operating Room, Hamadan, Iran
[3] Univ Med Sciense Qom, Dept Neurosurg, Nekuii Forghani Hosp, Qom, Iran
[4] Hamadan Univ Med Sci, Hamadan, Iran
关键词
tabilization; Spine; Unilateral; Bilateral; Spinal stenosis; Lumbar; BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; DEGENERATION; SURGERY; CAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35435
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: There are many reports about the risk factors for recurrence after laminectomy surgery. Some surgeons use unilateral and bilateral fusion to provide sufficient stability to the lumbar spine. However, its strength, safety, and effectiveness in young patients are not widely known. Therefore, this study was conducted to compare surgical methods of laminectomy with unilateral and bilateral fixation and laminectomy alone without interbody fusion in young patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Methods: 90 patients eligible for lumbar spinal stenosis surgery were selected through convenience sampling and randomly divided into three groups: laminectomy without fixation (A), laminectomy with unilateral fixation (B), and bilateral fixation (C). Pain, functional disability, quality of life, recurrent disc, adjacent segment disease (ASD), and fusion rate were evaluated and compared among the three groups six months post-surgery. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 16. Results: Six months after surgery, the mean score of functional disability in the bilateral group was significantly higher than the other groups (12.92 (3.30) vs 5.52 (1.91) and 4.30 (1.84), P < 0.05). Also, the highest mean score of pain after surgery was observed in the bilateral group (4.33 (0.70) vs 1.81(0.68) and 1.63(0.56), P < 0.05). The mean score of quality of life in the unilateral group was significantly higher than the other groups (87.81 (5.67) vs 68.58 (3.08) and 56.07 (4.04), P < 0.05). No significant difference was observed between the groups (P > 0.05) regarding fusion, recurrent disc herniation, and adjacent segment disease. Conclusions: Unilateral fixation provides the same benefits as bilateral fixation but has the additional benefits of being less invasive and minimizing the disadvantages of other investigated techniques during and after surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Lumbar Laminectomy Alone, Lumbar Laminectomy and Fusion, Stand-alone Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion, and Stand-alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Review of the Literature
    Shah, Manan
    Kolb, Bradley
    Yilmaz, Emre
    Halalmeh, Dia R.
    Moisi, Marc D.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 11 (09)
  • [2] A Comparison of Bilateral Decompression via Unilateral Approach and Classic Laminectomy in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Clinical Study
    Yaman, Onur
    Ozdemir, Nail
    Dagli, Ahmet Turan
    Acar, Erdem
    Dalbayrak, Sedat
    Temiz, Cuneyt
    TURKISH NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 25 (02) : 239 - 245
  • [3] Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy
    Mobbs, Ralph Jasper
    Li, Jane
    Sivabalan, Praveenan
    Raley, Darryl
    Rao, Prashanth J.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2014, 21 (02) : 179 - 186
  • [4] Outcome after Surgery of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: a Randomized Comparison of Bilateral Laminotomy, Trumpet Laminectomy, and Conventional Laminectomy
    Haddadi, Kaveh
    Qazvini, Hamid Reza Ganjeh
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2016, 3
  • [5] Unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: A prospective comparative study with conservatively treated patients
    Mariconda, M
    Fava, R
    Gatto, A
    Longo, C
    Milano, C
    Ducker, TB
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2002, 15 (01): : 39 - 46
  • [6] Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of lumbar foraminal stenosis
    Cheng, Xiaofei
    Zhang, Kai
    Sun, Xiaojiang
    Tian, Haijun
    Zhao, Changqing
    Zhao, Jie
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 22 (10): : 1687 - 1693
  • [7] Comparative Study of Unilateral and Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Xie, Youzhuan
    Ma, Hui
    Li, Hua
    Ding, Wei
    Zhao, Changqing
    Zhang, Pu
    Zhao, Jie
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2012, 35 (10) : E1517 - E1523
  • [8] Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis:: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy
    Thomé, C
    Zevgaridis, D
    Leheta, O
    Bäzner, H
    Pöckler-Schöniger, C
    Wöhrle, J
    Schmiedek, P
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2005, 3 (02) : 129 - 141
  • [9] Unilateral and Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Radiographic and Clinical Analysis
    Villavicencio, Alan T.
    Serxner, Benjamin J.
    Mason, Alexander
    Nelson, E. Lee
    Rajpal, Sharad
    Faes, Nathan
    Burneikiene, Sigita
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 83 (04) : 553 - 559
  • [10] Management of recurrent unilateral lumbar disc herniation in a single level: unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screws fixation with interbody fusion
    Ahmed, Omar El Farouk
    Morad, Sherif H.
    Abdelbar, Ahmed S.
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY PSYCHIATRY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 56 (01):