Comprehensive study on the selection and performance of the best electrode pair for electrocoagulation of textile wastewater using multi-criteria decision-making methods (TOPSIS, VIKOR and PROMETHEE II)

被引:0
|
作者
Ahmed, Tahmeed [1 ]
Ahsan, Amimul [1 ,2 ]
Khan, Md. Habibur Rahman Bejoy [1 ]
Nahian, Tamzid Kamal [1 ]
Antar, Rafiul Hasan [1 ]
Hasan, Alvy [1 ]
Karim, Md. Rezaul [1 ]
Shafiquzzaman, Md. [3 ]
Imteaz, Monzur [2 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Univ Technol, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Gazipur 1704, Bangladesh
[2] Swinburne Univ Technol, Dept Civil & Construct Engn, Melbourne, Australia
[3] Qassim Univ, Coll Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Buraydah 51452, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Wastewater treatment; Electrode materials; Pollutants removal; MCDM; Decision methods; REMOVAL; REACTOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121337
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The accelerating environmental impact of the textile industry, especially in water management, requires efficient wastewater treatment strategies. This study examines the effectiveness of various electrode pairs in the Electrocoagulation (EC) process for treating textile wastewater, focusing on removing of Total Suspended Solids (TSS), turbidity, Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), and Total Organic Carbon (TOC). A comprehensive analysis was conducted using thirty-six electrode pair combinations, consisting of six materials: Aluminium (Al), Zinc (Zn), Carbon (C), Copper (Cu), Mild Steel (MS), and Stainless Steel (SS). The results demonstrated that different electrode pairs yielded varying removal efficiencies for various pollutants, with the highest efficiencies being 92.09% for COD (Al-C pair), 99.66% for TSS (Al-Cu pair), 99.17% for turbidity (Al-MS pair), and 70.99% for TOC (SS-SS pair). However, no single electrode pair excelled in removing all pollutant categories. To address this, three Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods such as TOPSIS, VIKOR, and PROMETHEE II were used to assess the most effective electrode pair. The results indicated that the Al-Zn combination was the most efficient, exhibiting high removal efficiencies for various pollutants (99.32% for TSS, 98.88% for turbidity, 68.62% for COD, and 57.96% for TOC). This study demonstrates that the EC process can effectively treat textile effluent and emphasizes the importance of selecting suitable electrode materials. Furthermore, pollutant removal was optimal with the Al-Zn electrode pair, offering a balanced and efficient approach to textile wastewater treatment. Thus, MCDM methods offer a robust framework for assessing and optimizing electrode selection, providing valuable insights for sustainable environmental management practices.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Using the PROMETHEE and TOPSIS Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods to Evaluate Optimal Generation
    Kittur, Javeed
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON POWER AND ADVANCED CONTROL ENGINEERING (ICPACE), 2015, : 80 - 85
  • [2] Multi-criteria decision-making toward supplier selection: exploration of PROMETHEE II method
    Agrawal, Nishant
    BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2022, 29 (07) : 2122 - 2146
  • [3] Assessing Euro 2020 Strategy Using Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: VIKOR and TOPSIS
    Ture, Hasan
    Dogan, Seyyide
    Kocak, Deniz
    SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2019, 142 (02) : 645 - 665
  • [4] Drone selection using multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Khan, Muhammad Sohaib
    Shah, Syed Irtiza Ali
    Javed, Ali
    Qadri, Nafees Mumtaz
    Hussain, Nadeem
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2021 INTERNATIONAL BHURBAN CONFERENCE ON APPLIED SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES (IBCAST), 2021, : 256 - 270
  • [5] Assessing Euro 2020 Strategy Using Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: VIKOR and TOPSIS
    Hasan Ture
    Seyyide Dogan
    Deniz Kocak
    Social Indicators Research, 2019, 142 : 645 - 665
  • [6] Material selection using multi-criteria decision-making methods: a comparative study
    Athawale, Vijay Manikrao
    Chakraborty, Shankar
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART L-JOURNAL OF MATERIALS-DESIGN AND APPLICATIONS, 2012, 226 (L4) : 266 - 285
  • [7] Material selection using multi-criteria decision-making methods: A comparative study
    Department of Mechanical Engineering, Government Polytechnic, India
    不详
    Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part L J. Mat. Des. Appl., 4 (266-285):
  • [8] Multi-criteria Decision-making Methods for Sustainable Decision-making in the Mining Industry (A Comprehensive Study)
    Pouresmaieli, Mahdi
    Ataei, Mohammad
    Qarahasanlou, Ali Nouri
    Barabadi, Abbas
    JOURNAL OF MINING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 15 (02): : 683 - 706
  • [9] Wastewater Treatment and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods: A Review
    Sharma, Tina
    Kumar, Anuj
    Pant, Sangeeta
    Kotecha, Ketan
    IEEE ACCESS, 2023, 11 : 143704 - 143720
  • [10] Comparison of multi-criteria decision-making methods for equipment selection
    Hodgett, Richard Edgar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 85 (5-8): : 1145 - 1157