Comprehensive study on the selection and performance of the best electrode pair for electrocoagulation of textile wastewater using multi-criteria decision-making methods (TOPSIS, VIKOR and PROMETHEE II)

被引:0
|
作者
Ahmed, Tahmeed [1 ]
Ahsan, Amimul [1 ,2 ]
Khan, Md. Habibur Rahman Bejoy [1 ]
Nahian, Tamzid Kamal [1 ]
Antar, Rafiul Hasan [1 ]
Hasan, Alvy [1 ]
Karim, Md. Rezaul [1 ]
Shafiquzzaman, Md. [3 ]
Imteaz, Monzur [2 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Univ Technol, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Gazipur 1704, Bangladesh
[2] Swinburne Univ Technol, Dept Civil & Construct Engn, Melbourne, Australia
[3] Qassim Univ, Coll Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Buraydah 51452, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Wastewater treatment; Electrode materials; Pollutants removal; MCDM; Decision methods; REMOVAL; REACTOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121337
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The accelerating environmental impact of the textile industry, especially in water management, requires efficient wastewater treatment strategies. This study examines the effectiveness of various electrode pairs in the Electrocoagulation (EC) process for treating textile wastewater, focusing on removing of Total Suspended Solids (TSS), turbidity, Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), and Total Organic Carbon (TOC). A comprehensive analysis was conducted using thirty-six electrode pair combinations, consisting of six materials: Aluminium (Al), Zinc (Zn), Carbon (C), Copper (Cu), Mild Steel (MS), and Stainless Steel (SS). The results demonstrated that different electrode pairs yielded varying removal efficiencies for various pollutants, with the highest efficiencies being 92.09% for COD (Al-C pair), 99.66% for TSS (Al-Cu pair), 99.17% for turbidity (Al-MS pair), and 70.99% for TOC (SS-SS pair). However, no single electrode pair excelled in removing all pollutant categories. To address this, three Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods such as TOPSIS, VIKOR, and PROMETHEE II were used to assess the most effective electrode pair. The results indicated that the Al-Zn combination was the most efficient, exhibiting high removal efficiencies for various pollutants (99.32% for TSS, 98.88% for turbidity, 68.62% for COD, and 57.96% for TOC). This study demonstrates that the EC process can effectively treat textile effluent and emphasizes the importance of selecting suitable electrode materials. Furthermore, pollutant removal was optimal with the Al-Zn electrode pair, offering a balanced and efficient approach to textile wastewater treatment. Thus, MCDM methods offer a robust framework for assessing and optimizing electrode selection, providing valuable insights for sustainable environmental management practices.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Selection of Construction Equipment by Using Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods
    Temiz, I.
    Calis, G.
    CREATIVE CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE 2017, CCC 2017, 2017, 196 : 286 - 293
  • [32] Multi-criteria group decision-making with cloud model and TOPSIS for alternative selection under uncertainty
    Zhang, Limao
    Chen, Weiyi
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2022, 26 (22) : 12509 - 12529
  • [33] A REVIEW OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHODS FOR BUILDING ASSESSMENT, SELECTION, AND RETROFIT
    Villalba, Paola
    Sanchez-garrido, Antonio J.
    Yepes, Victor
    JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 30 (05) : 465 - 480
  • [34] Consensus among Multi-Criteria Decision-Making methods: Using methods as a voter
    Hocaoglu, M. Fatih
    Tosun, Emre
    JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE OF GAZI UNIVERSITY, 2024, 40 (01): : 103 - 120
  • [35] Using AHP and PROMETHEE multi-criteria decision making methods to define suitable apiary locations
    Sari, Fatih
    Kandemir, Irfan
    Ceylan, Durmus Ali
    Gul, Aziz
    JOURNAL OF APICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2020, 59 (04) : 546 - 557
  • [36] Selection of the Most Feasible Wastewater Treatment Technology in Pakistan Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM)
    Ali, Yousaf
    Pervez, Hamza
    Khan, Jehangir
    WATER CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2020, 5 (3-4) : 199 - 213
  • [37] Selection of the Most Feasible Wastewater Treatment Technology in Pakistan Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM)
    Yousaf Ali
    Hamza Pervez
    Jehangir Khan
    Water Conservation Science and Engineering, 2020, 5 : 199 - 213
  • [38] Deconstruction plan assessment using multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Chen, Z
    Abdullah, A
    Anumba, C
    Li, H
    Xu, Q
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2005 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONSTRUCTION & REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2: CHALLENGE OF INNOVATION IN CONSTRUCTION AND REAL ESTATE, 2005, : 465 - 469
  • [39] Performance evaluation of sustainability in a textile firm via multi-criteria decision-making method
    Gonca, Simsek Guenduez
    Cagdas, Guenduez
    INDUSTRIA TEXTILA, 2023, 74 (04): : 426 - 432
  • [40] Service selection using fuzzy multi-criteria decision making: a comprehensive review
    Masdari, Mohammad
    Khezri, Hemn
    JOURNAL OF AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE AND HUMANIZED COMPUTING, 2021, 12 (02) : 2803 - 2834