Comprehensive study on the selection and performance of the best electrode pair for electrocoagulation of textile wastewater using multi-criteria decision-making methods (TOPSIS, VIKOR and PROMETHEE II)

被引:0
|
作者
Ahmed, Tahmeed [1 ]
Ahsan, Amimul [1 ,2 ]
Khan, Md. Habibur Rahman Bejoy [1 ]
Nahian, Tamzid Kamal [1 ]
Antar, Rafiul Hasan [1 ]
Hasan, Alvy [1 ]
Karim, Md. Rezaul [1 ]
Shafiquzzaman, Md. [3 ]
Imteaz, Monzur [2 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Univ Technol, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Gazipur 1704, Bangladesh
[2] Swinburne Univ Technol, Dept Civil & Construct Engn, Melbourne, Australia
[3] Qassim Univ, Coll Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Buraydah 51452, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Wastewater treatment; Electrode materials; Pollutants removal; MCDM; Decision methods; REMOVAL; REACTOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121337
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The accelerating environmental impact of the textile industry, especially in water management, requires efficient wastewater treatment strategies. This study examines the effectiveness of various electrode pairs in the Electrocoagulation (EC) process for treating textile wastewater, focusing on removing of Total Suspended Solids (TSS), turbidity, Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), and Total Organic Carbon (TOC). A comprehensive analysis was conducted using thirty-six electrode pair combinations, consisting of six materials: Aluminium (Al), Zinc (Zn), Carbon (C), Copper (Cu), Mild Steel (MS), and Stainless Steel (SS). The results demonstrated that different electrode pairs yielded varying removal efficiencies for various pollutants, with the highest efficiencies being 92.09% for COD (Al-C pair), 99.66% for TSS (Al-Cu pair), 99.17% for turbidity (Al-MS pair), and 70.99% for TOC (SS-SS pair). However, no single electrode pair excelled in removing all pollutant categories. To address this, three Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods such as TOPSIS, VIKOR, and PROMETHEE II were used to assess the most effective electrode pair. The results indicated that the Al-Zn combination was the most efficient, exhibiting high removal efficiencies for various pollutants (99.32% for TSS, 98.88% for turbidity, 68.62% for COD, and 57.96% for TOC). This study demonstrates that the EC process can effectively treat textile effluent and emphasizes the importance of selecting suitable electrode materials. Furthermore, pollutant removal was optimal with the Al-Zn electrode pair, offering a balanced and efficient approach to textile wastewater treatment. Thus, MCDM methods offer a robust framework for assessing and optimizing electrode selection, providing valuable insights for sustainable environmental management practices.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multi-Criteria Decision Making in the PMEDM Process by Using MARCOS, TOPSIS, and MAIRCA Methods
    Nguyen, Huu-Quang
    Nguyen, Van-Tung
    Phan, Dang-Phong
    Tran, Quoc-Hoang
    Vu, Ngoc-Pi
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (08):
  • [42] Multi-criteria decision-making in the evaluation of environmental quality of OECD countries The entropy weight and VIKOR methods
    Van Thac Dang
    Dang, Wilson V. T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ETHICS AND SYSTEMS, 2019, 36 (01) : 119 - 130
  • [43] Service selection using fuzzy multi-criteria decision making: a comprehensive review
    Mohammad Masdari
    Hemn Khezri
    Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 2021, 12 : 2803 - 2834
  • [44] Application of multi-criteria decision-making theory with VIKOR-WASPAS-Entropy methods: A case study of silent Genset
    Vaid, Sanjay Kumar
    Vaid, Gopal
    Kaur, Swapandeep
    Kumar, Raman
    Sidhu, Manpreet Singh
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2022, 50 : 2416 - 2423
  • [45] Application of multi-criteria decision-making theory with VIKOR-WASPAS-Entropy methods: A case study of silent Genset
    Vaid, Sanjay Kumar
    Vaid, Gopal
    Kaur, Swapandeep
    Kumar, Raman
    Sidhu, Manpreet Singh
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2022, 50 : 2416 - 2423
  • [46] An Application for Measuring Performance Quality of Schools by Using the PROMETHEE Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method
    Murat, Sedat
    Kazan, Halim
    Coskun, S. Semih
    WORLD CONFERENCE ON TECHNOLOGY, INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP, 2015, : 729 - 738
  • [47] International market selection: an application of hybrid multi-criteria decision-making technique in the textile sector
    Gabriel Vanegas-Lopez, Juan
    Jaime Baena-Rojas, Jose
    Alejandro Lopez-Cadavid, Diego
    Mathew, Manoj
    REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND STRATEGY, 2021, 31 (01) : 127 - 150
  • [48] The use of multi-criteria decision-making methods in business analytics: A comprehensive literature review
    Yalcin, Ahmet Selcuk
    Kilic, Huseyin Selcuk
    Delen, Dursun
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2022, 174
  • [49] Testing the reliability of deterministic multi-criteria decision-making methods using building performance simulation
    Kokaraki, Nikoleta
    Hopfe, Christina J.
    Robinson, Elaine
    Nikolaidou, Elli
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 112 (991-1007): : 991 - 1007
  • [50] A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model Combining DANP with VIKOR for Sustainable Supplier Selection in Electronics Industry
    Rahardjo, Benedictus
    Wang, Fu-Kwun
    Lo, Shih-Che
    Chou, Jia-Hong
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (05)