Comprehensive dosimetric commissioning of proton minibeam radiotherapy on a single gantry proton system

被引:0
|
作者
Lin, Yuting [1 ]
Li, Wangyao [1 ]
Wang, Aoxiang [1 ,2 ]
Johnson, Daniel [1 ]
Gan, Gregory N. [1 ]
Gao, Hao [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Kansas City, KS 66103 USA
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Biomed Engn, Wuhan, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2024年 / 14卷
关键词
proton therapy; spatially fractionated radiotherapy; proton mini-beam; small field dosimetry; film dosimetry; proton dosimetry; FRACTIONATED RADIATION-THERAPY;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2024.1421869
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) can deliver spatially fractionated dose distributions with submillimeter resolution. These dose distributions exhibit significant heterogeneity in both depth and lateral directions. Accurate characterization of pMBRT doses requires dosimetry devices with high spatial resolution and a wide dynamic range. Furthermore, the dependency of dosimetric measurements on Linear Energy Transfer (LET), as observed in conventional proton therapy, is also present in pMBRT depth dose measurements.Purpose This work demonstrates the process of performing comprehensive dosimetric measurements to characterize the pMBRT collimator on a clinical single-gantry proton machine, utilizing commercially available dosimetry devices.Methods The minibeam collimator is designed to be mounted on the clinical nozzle as a beam-modifying accessory. Three collimators, each with a slit opening of 0.4 mm, are thoroughly evaluated. The center-to-center (c-t-c) distances of the slits for these collimators are 2.8 mm, 3.2 mm, and 4.0 mm, respectively. High spatial resolution dosimetry devices are essential for PMBRT dose characterizations. To meet this requirement, two-dimensional (2D) dose measurement devices, Gafchromic films, are used to measure lateral profiles at various depths. Films are also used for depth dose profile measurements in solid water. Additionally, high-resolution point dose detectors, microDiamond, and Razor diode detectors are employed for lateral profile measurements at various depths. Percent depth dose (PDD) measurements of pMBRT in solid water, with various proton energies, collimators, and air gaps, are performed using Gafchromic films. The film's LET dependency for proton beams is corrected to ensure accurate pMBRT PDD measurements. The Monte Carlo simulation tool TOPAS is utilized to compare and validate all experimental measurements.Results At depths where LET is not a concern, film dose measurements were consistent with microDiamond and Razor diode point measurements. The point detectors need to be orientated with the thin side aligned to the incoming beam. Comparison of the lateral dose profiles extracted from TOPAS simulations, films, microDiamond, and Razor diode detectors shows a passing rate exceeding 98% in 1D gamma analysis at 3% 0.1 mm criteria.However, when the microDiamond detector is orientated to face the pMBRT beam, its spatial resolution may not be sufficient to capture the peak and valley dose accurately. Nevertheless, an accuracy within 2% can still be achieved when comparing the average dose. The PDD measurements show that the peak valley dose ratio (PVDR) of pMBRT can be altered at different depths with different air gaps using the same collimator or different collimators of different c-t-c distances.Conclusion Our study demonstrates that comprehensive dose measurements for pMBRT can be conducted using standard clinical dose measurement devices. These measurements are indispensable for guiding and ensuring accurate dose reporting in pre-clinical studies using the pMBRT technique.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Shielding Design and Affirmation for a Single Room Proton Radiotherapy System
    Klein, E.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 3180 - 3180
  • [42] Dosimetric Comparison of Carbon and Proton Radiotherapy for Recurrent Nasopharynx Carcinoma
    Sheng, Y.
    Zhao, J.
    Wang, W.
    Lin, L.
    Liu, X.
    Shahnazi, K.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3507 - 3507
  • [43] Dosimetric Evaluation of Proton Arc Therapy for Brain Stereotactic Radiotherapy
    Min, B.
    Kim, D.
    Yoo, S.
    Jeong, H.
    Lee, S.
    Shin, D.
    Lee, S.
    Park, S.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (06) : 3634 - +
  • [44] A DOSIMETRIC COMPARISON OF PROTON RADIOTHERAPY AND IMRT IN PEDIATRIC RMS PATIENTS ENROLLED ON A PHASE II PROTON STUDY
    Ladra, M.
    Edgington, S.
    Moteabbed, M.
    Mahajan, A.
    Grosshans, D.
    MacDonald, S.
    Tarbell, N.
    Yock, T.
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2014, 61 : S236 - S236
  • [45] Commissioning an in-room mobile CT for adaptive proton therapy with a compact proton system
    Oliver, Jasmine A.
    Zeidan, Omar
    Meeks, Sanford L.
    Shah, Amish P.
    Pukala, Jason
    Kelly, Patrick
    Ramakrishna, Naren R.
    Willoughby, Twyla R.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 19 (03): : 149 - 158
  • [46] Commissioning of a proton gantry equipped with dual x-ray imagers and a robotic patient positioner, and evaluation of the accuracy of single-beam image registration for this system
    Wang, Ning
    Ghebremedhin, Abiel
    Patyal, Baldev
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 2980 - 2991
  • [47] Reduced side effects by proton minibeam radiotherapy: In-vivo study in a mouse ear model
    Schmid, T. E.
    Girst, S.
    Greubel, C.
    Reindl, J.
    Siebenwirth, C.
    Ilicic, K.
    Walsh, D. W. M.
    Dollinger, G.
    Multhoff, G.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 51 : S122 - S122
  • [48] Commissioning of a Treatment Planning System with Proton Therapy Capability
    Wang, N.
    Ghebremedhin, A.
    Patyal, B.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (06)
  • [49] Commissioning of a Treatment Planning System for Proton Spot Scanning
    Saini, J.
    Bowen, S.
    Kang, Y.
    Schultz, L.
    Bloch, C.
    Nicewonger, D.
    Herrera, M.
    Wong, T.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 238 - 238
  • [50] Commissioning of RF system of the 200 MeV proton cyclotron
    Chen, Gen
    Liu, Guang
    Zhao, Yanping
    Peng, Zhen
    Zhang, Xin
    Chao, Chujie
    Long, Xuyun
    Yu, Chuansong
    Karamyshev, Oleg
    Karamysheva, Galina
    Shirkov, Grigori
    Caruso, Antonio
    Calabretta, Luciano
    10TH INTERNATIONAL PARTICLE ACCELERATOR CONFERENCE, 2019, 1350