A Comparative Study on Aesthetic and Pain Outcomes in Flap Versus Implant Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy

被引:0
|
作者
Paredes, Kenneth Aleman [1 ]
Castillo, Jennifer V. [2 ]
Quevedo, Mauricio Montelongo [2 ]
Ocejo, Arantza [3 ]
Lechuga, Hector A. Vazquez [4 ]
Camara, Karime M. Navarro [5 ]
Figueroa, Daniela Ponce [6 ]
Garcia, Diana K. Falcon [7 ]
Mendoza, Carina L. Nolasco [1 ]
Castillo, Jaqueline L. [2 ]
Enriquez, Jose A. Victoria [8 ]
Valdes, Jose R. Flores [9 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Gen Reg 220 Jose Vicente Villada, Surg, Toluca, Mexico
[2] Univ Autonoma Guadalajara, Gen Med, Guadalajara, Spain
[3] Univ Autonoma Guadalajara, Gynecol, Guadalajara, Mexico
[4] Univ Juarez Estado de Durango, Med & Nutr, Durango, Mexico
[5] Univ Autonoma Guadalajara, Surg, Guadalajara, Mexico
[6] Inst Estudios Super Tamaulipas, Gen Med, Tampico, Mexico
[7] Univ Juarez Autonoma Tabasco, Hlth Sci, Villahermosa, Mexico
[8] Univ Autonoma Estado de Mexico, Gen Surg, Toluca, Mexico
[9] Oncol Consultants PA, Res, Houston, TX 77024 USA
关键词
primary breast malignancy; breast flap; plastic and reconstructive surgery; breast implant; radical mastectomy; COMPLICATIONS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.63772
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer death among women worldwide. Surgical treatments, including mastectomy and subsequent breast reconstruction, are critical components of breast cancer management. This systematic review compares the outcomes of flap versus implant reconstruction post-mastectomy, focusing on aesthetic differences, pain, recovery, and psychological adaptation. Adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive literature search across PubMed, Cochrane, and ScienceDirect databases. Inclusion criteria targeted studies comparing aesthetic outcomes, pain, recovery costs, duration, and psychological adaptation between flap and implant breast reconstructions. We excluded non-English and non-Spanish studies, case reports, and those without full-text availability. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). From an initial pool of 25,881 articles, 16 high-quality studies involving 14,196 participants were selected for synthesis. Flap reconstruction was associated with higher patient satisfaction regarding aesthetic outcomes and psychological well-being but also had higher complication rates, including infections and wound dehiscence. Implant reconstruction showed fewer complications but did not achieve the same level of patient satisfaction. Flap reconstruction, despite its higher complication rates, tends to provide superior aesthetic and psychological outcomes compared to implant reconstruction. These findings highlight the importance of personalized treatment plans considering individual patient needs and preferences. Future research should focus on long-term randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and standardized outcome measures to further delineate the comparative effectiveness of these reconstruction techniques. Personalized care and ongoing research are essential to improving the quality of life for breast cancer survivors undergoing reconstruction.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Motivations of women seeking breast reconstruction after mastectomy, a comparative study
    Charavel, M
    Bremond, A
    BULLETIN DU CANCER, 1996, 83 (01) : 46 - 53
  • [32] Aesthetic outcome after implant and DIEP flap breast reconstruction: An exploratory, prospective comparison of 25 cases
    Brinkman, J. Nick
    Timman, Reinier
    Gopie, Jessica P.
    Kleijne, Annelies
    Tibben, Aad
    Mureau, Marc A. M.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2015, 68 (07): : 1018 - 1019
  • [33] Implant augmentation after perforator flap breast reconstruction
    Chia, Hui L.
    Breitenfeldt, Nicole
    Canal, Alessandra C. E.
    Malata, Charles M.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2010, 63 (02): : E172 - E173
  • [34] Mastectomy Skin Necrosis After Breast Reconstruction A Comparative Analysis Between Autologous Reconstruction and Implant-Based Reconstruction
    Sue, Gloria R.
    Lee, Gordon K.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2018, 80 : S285 - S287
  • [35] Beyond Mastectomy: The Incidence of Subsequent Aesthetic Procedures after Mastectomy with and without Breast Reconstruction
    O'Neill, Elizabeth S.
    Toms, John A.
    Hansdorfer, Marek A.
    Kokosis, George
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2024, 12 (07)
  • [36] National Trends in Immediate Breast Reconstruction: An Analysis of Implant-based versus Autologous Reconstruction After Mastectomy
    Mandelbaum, Ava
    Thompson, Carlie
    Attai, Deanna
    Baker, Jennifer
    Slack, Ginger
    Dinome, Maggie
    Benharash, Peyman
    Lee, Minna
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (SUPPL 2) : S523 - S524
  • [37] National Trends in Immediate Breast Reconstruction: An Analysis of Implant-Based Versus Autologous Reconstruction After Mastectomy
    Ava D. Mandelbaum
    Carlie K. Thompson
    Deanna J. Attai
    Jennifer L. Baker
    Ginger Slack
    Maggie L. DiNome
    Peyman Benharash
    Minna K. Lee
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2020, 27 : 4777 - 4785
  • [38] National Trends in Immediate Breast Reconstruction: An Analysis of Implant-Based Versus Autologous Reconstruction After Mastectomy
    Mandelbaum, Ava D.
    Thompson, Carlie K.
    Attai, Deanna J.
    Baker, Jennifer L.
    Slack, Ginger
    DiNome, Maggie L.
    Benharash, Peyman
    Lee, Minna K.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (12) : 4777 - 4785
  • [39] Implant Breast Reconstruction After Salvage Mastectomy in Irradiated Patients
    Cagli, Barbara
    Segreto, Francesco
    Persichetti, Paolo
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2011, 67 (05) : 565 - 565
  • [40] Invited commentary - Pain after mastectomy and breast reconstruction
    Vadivelu, Nalini
    Schreck, Maggie
    Lopez, Javier
    Kodumudi, Gopal
    Narayan, Deepak
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2008, 74 (04) : 285 - 296